Evaluation of nutritional programs’s impact
Keywords:
Feeding, Program evaluation, Evaluation studies as topic, Nutrition public health, Public policiesAbstract
Persistent shortcomings in our knowledge of the actual effects of programs and interventions are due to a gap in both the quantity and methodological quality of impact evaluations. Impact evaluations are studies that measure the impact on health directly attributable to a specific program or policy, regardless of other potential explanatory factors. The aim of this manuscript is to present the types of epidemiological studies that can be employed in impact evaluations of nutrition programs. Study designs are presented according to the level of inference needed for the evaluation (adequacy, plausibility and probability). Examples of program evaluations using cross-sectional, quasi-experimental, and randomized controlled trials are discussed. The advantage of
the observational studies over randomized controlled trials when the aim is to assess programs effectiveness in real world conditions is highlighted. Impact evaluations are urgently needed to subsidize decision makers on what programs should continue to receive investments and what programs need to be reformulated.
References
Center for Global Development. When will we ever learn? Report of the Evaluation Gap Working Group. Washington (DC): 2006 [cited 2008 Mar 20]. Available from: .
Bryce J, Victora CG. MCE-IMCI Technical Advisors. Ten methodological lessons from the multycountry evaluation of Integrated management of childhood illness. Health Policy Plan. 2005; 20 (Suppl 1):i94-i105.
World Health Organization. A critical link. Interventions for physical growth and physiological development: a review. Geneva: Who; 1999. WHO/CHS/CAH/99.3.
Hill Z, Kirkwood B, Edmond K. Family and community practices that promote child survival, growth and development: a review of the evidence. Geneva: WHO; 2004.
Allen L, Gillespie S. What works? A review of the efficacy and effectiveness of nutrition interventions. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
Santos IS. Intervenções nutricionais na infância. In: Kac G, Sichieri R, Gigante DP, editores. Epidemiologia nutricional. Rio de Janeiro: Atheneu; 2007.
Black N. Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care. BMJ. 1996; 312:1215-18.
World Health Organization. Complementary feeding of young children in developing countries: a review of current scientific knowledge. Geneva: WHO; 1998. WHO/NUT/98.1.
Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde. Atenção Integrada às doenças prevalentes na infância (AIDPI). Washington (DC): WHO; 1999.
Friedman LM, Furberg CD, DeMets DL. Fundamentals of clinical trials. 3rd ed. New York: Springer; 1998.
Gordis L. Epidemiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2004.
Habicht JP, Victora CG, Vaughan JP. Evaluation designs for adequacy, plausibility and probability of public health programme performance and impact. Intern J Epidemiol. 1999; 28(1):10-8.
Santos IS. Guia metodológico de avaliação e definição de indicadores: doenças crônicas nãotransmissíveis e Rede Carmen. Brasília: Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde, 2006 [citado 2008 Fev 8]. Disponível em: <http://www.saude.gov.br/bvs>.
Assunção MCF, Santos IS, Barros AJD, Gigante DP, Victora CG. Efeito da fortificação de farinhas com ferro sobre anemia em pré-escolares, Pelotas, RS. Rev Saúde Pública. 2007; 41(4):539-48.
Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Resolução no. 344. Revoga a resolução RDC nº 15, de 21 de fevereiro de 2000. Diário Oficial da União 2002; 18 de dezembro.
Brasil. Plano de combate à fome e à miséria: princípios, prioridades e mapa das ações de governo. Brasília: MDS; 1993.
Castro IRR, Monteiro CA. Avaliação do impacto do programa “Leite é Saúde” na recuperação de crianças desnutridas no Município do Rio de Janeiro. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2002; 5(1):52-62.
Santos IS, Gigante DP, Coitinho DC, Haisma H, Valle NCJ, Valente GCM. Avaliação do impacto de um programa de suplementação alimentar para crianças desnutridas no Brasil. Cad Saúde Pública. 2005; 21(3):776-85.
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de Atenção Básica. Avaliação do programa bolsa família: segunda fase. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2005. Série C. Projetos, programas e relatórios.
Victora CG, Habicht JP, Bryce J. Evidence-based public health. Moving beyond randomized trials Am J Public Health. 2004; 94(3):400-5.
Santos I, Victora CG, Martines J, Gonçalves H, Gigante DP, Valle NJ, et al. Nutrition counseling increases weight gain among Brazilian children. J Nutr. 2001; 131(11):2866-73.
Bryce J, Victora CG, habicht JP, Vaughan JP, Black RE. The multi-country evaluation of the integrated management if childhood illness strategy: lessons for the evaluation of public health interventions. Am J Public Health. 2004; 94(3):406-15.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Iná da Silva dos SANTOS
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
