Escala de conexão com a natureza

evidências psicométricas no contexto brasileiro

Autores

  • Viviany Silva PESSOA Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Centro de Educação, Departamento de Psicopedagogia.
  • Valdiney Veloso GOUVEIA Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Centro de Ciências Humanas, Letras e Artes, Departamento de Psicologia.
  • Ana Karla Silva SOARES Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Centro de Ciências Humanas, Letras e Artes, Departamento de Psicologia.
  • Roosevelt VILAR Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Centro de Ciências Humanas, Letras e Artes, Departamento de Psicologia.
  • Leogildo Alves FREIRES Universidade Federal de Roraima, Centro de Educação, Departamento de Psicologia

Palavras-chave:

Análise psicométrica, Conexão com a natureza, Validade fatorial

Resumo

Este artigo objetivou reunir evidências de validade e precisão da Connectedness to Nature Scale no contexto brasileiro. Dois estudos foram realizados. No Estudo 1, participaram 204 pessoas com idade média de 33 anos (Desvio-Padrão = 13,83), as quais responderam a referida escala e perguntas demográficas. Os resultados de uma análise de componentes principais indicaram uma estrutura unifatorial (á = 0,81). No Estudo 2, participaram 220 estudantes universitários com idade média de 23 anos (Desvio-Padrão = 5,82), os quais responderam a escala adaptada e perguntas demográficas. Uma análise fatorial confirmatória (estimador ML) confirmou a adequação da estrutura unifatorial (e.g., Comparative Fit Index = 0,91, Root-Mean-Square Error of Approximation = 0,064), obtendo consistência interna satisfatória (á = 0,83). Concluindo, a Connectedness to Nature Scale mostrou ser uma medida psicometricamente adequada para avaliar um fator geral de conexão com a natureza, podendo ser empregada em estudos futuros.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Brown, T. A. (2003). Confirmatory fator analysis of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire: Multiple factors or method effects? Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41(12), 1411-1426. Retrieved October 17, 2014, from http://sws1.bu.edu/tabrown/Manuscripts/Brown%202003.pdf

Bruni, C. M., & Schultz, W. (2010). Implicit beliefs about self and nature: Evidence from an IAT game. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 95-102. Retrieved July 27, 2012, from http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0272494409000784/1-s2.0-S0272494409000784-main.pdf?_tid=0cc8757a-5956-11e4-8da0-00000aacb361&acdnat=1413918864_ae79755 a214c30f42aec9294f583e487

Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with Amos: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

Cervinka, R., Röderer K., & Hefler, E. (2012). Are nature lovers happy? On various indicators of well-being and connectedness with nature. Journal of Health Psychology, 17(3), 379-388. Retrieved January 29, 2013, from http://hpq.sagepub.com/content/17/3/379.full.pdf

Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309-319. Retrieved February 10, 2013, from http://lep.unige.ch/system/files/issas/files/clark_watson_1995_psychass.pdf

Coelho, J. A. P. M. (2009). Habilidade de conservação de água: uma explicação pautada em valores humanos, emoções e atitudes ambientais (Tese de doutorado em não-publicada). Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa. Recuperado em junho 28, 2013, de http://www.vvgouveia.net/en/images/Teses/Coelho_J._A._P._M._2009.pdf.pdf

Dunlap, R. E., & van Liere, K. D. (1978). The new environmental paradigm. Journal of Environmental Education, 9(4), 10-19.

Ellis, R. J., & Thompson, F. (1997). Culture and the environment in the pacific northwest. American Political Behavior, 91(4), 885-897. Retrieved July 28, 2012, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_ id=1123672

Gosling, E., & Williams, K. J. H. (2010). Connectedness to nature, place attachment and conservation behavior: Testing connectedness theory amongfarmers. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 298-304. Retrieved July 28, 2012, from http://ac.elscdn.com/S027249441000006X/1-s2.0-S027249441000006Xmain.pdf?_tid=004ffc7c-5957-11e4-8224-00000aab0f6b&acdnat=1413919273_3b9160974bc 45732e61dc2df7196e318

Gouveia, V. V. (2013). Teoria funcionalista dos valores: fundamentos, aplicações e perspectivas. São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo.

Hair Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2009). Análise multivariada de dados (6a ed.). Porto Alegre: Bookman.

Hakstian, A. R., & Whalen, T. E. (1976). A k-sample significance test for independent alpha coefficients. Psychometrika, 41(2), 219-231. Retrieved February 10, 2013, from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF02291840

Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7(2), 191-205. Retrieved February 15, 2013, from http://orm.sagepub.com/content/7/2/191.full.pdf+html

Hefler, E., Zeidler, D., & Cervinka, R. (2009). Connectedness with nature and support in life through spirituality. In H. Gutscher, H. J. Mosler, B. Meyer, S. Mischke, & M. Soland (Eds.), 8th Biennial Conference Environmental Psychology (pp.84). Zürich: Universität Zürich. Retrieved May 12, 2012, from http://www.meduniwien.ac.at/umwelthygiene/p018_cn_spirituality.pdf

Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modeling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60. Retrieved February 12, 2013, from http://arrow.dit.ie/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=buschmanart

Kaiser, F. G., & Wilson, M. (2004). Goal-directed conservation behavior: The specific composition of a general performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(7), 1531-1544. Retrieved June 29, 2012, from http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0191886903002460/1-s2.0-S0191886903002460-main.pdf?_tid=1b4c81ca-5958-11e4-8a3700000aab0f01&a cdnat=1413919747_9d64d89f694eb37fdde0397055dd1ac5

Kals, E., Schumacher, D., & Montada, L. (1999). Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior, 31(2), 178-202. Retrieved June 29, 2012, from http://eab.sagepub.com/content/31/2/178.full.pdf

Kim, S., & Feldt, L. S. (2008). A comparison of tests for equality of two or more independent alphacoefficients. Journal of Educational Measurement, 45(2), 179-193. Retrieved February 15, 2013, from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2008.00059.x/abstract

Maloney, M. P., & Ward, M. P. (1973). Ecology: Let’s hear from the people: An objective scale for measurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge. American Psychologist, 28(7), 583-586. Retrieved February 15,2013, from http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/amp/28/7/583.pdf

Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 503-515. Retrieved July 26, 2012, from http://gse.cat.org.uk/downloads/connectedness_to_nature_paper.pdf

Mokken, R. J., & Lewis, C. (1982). A nonparametric approach to the analysis of dichotomous item scores. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6(4), 417-430. Retrieved February 16, 2013, from http://conservancy.umn.edu/ bitstream/handle/11299/101545/1/v06n4p417.pdf

Olivos, P., Aragonés, J. I., & Amérigo, M. (2011). The connectedness to nature scale and its relationship with environmental beliefs and identity. International Journal of Hispanic Psychology, 4(1), 5-20. Retrieved July 25, 2012, from https://investigacion.uclm.es/documentos/fi_1331812710-olivos.aragones.amerigo.2011.connectedness.nature.sacle.pdf

Pasquali, L. (2003). Psicometria: teoria dos testes na Psicologia e na Educação. Petrópolis: Vozes.

Perrin, J. L., & Benassi, V. A. (2009). The connectedness to natures scale: A measure of emotional connection to nature? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(4), 434-440. Retrieved July 25, 2012, from http://ac.elscdn.com/S0272494409000243/1-s2.0-S027249440900 0243-main.pdf?_tid=152911ac-595b-11e4-ac2e-00000aab0f27&acdnat=1413921026_33260d97d0ad78ca2185795 cadd91633

Pessoa, V. V. (2011). Análise do conhecimento e das atitudes frente às fontes renováveis de energia: uma contribuição da Psicologia (Tese de Doutorado não-publicada). Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa. Recuperado em junho 28, 2012, de http://www.vvgouveia.net/en/images/Teses/Pessoa_V._S._2011.pdf.pdf

Primi, R., Muniz, M., & Nunes, C. H. S. S. (2009). Definições contemporâneas de validade de testes psicológicos.In C. S. Hutz (Org.), Avanços e polêmicas em avaliação psicológica (pp.243-266). São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo.

R Development Core Team. (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved February 25, 2013, from http://web.mit.edu/r_v3.0.1/fullrefman.pdf

Schultz, P. W. (2000). Empathizing with nature: The effects of perspective taking on concern for environmental issues. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 391-406. Retrieved July 27, 2012, from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/

Schultz, P. W. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(4), 327-339. Retrieved July 27, 2012, from http://ac.elscdn.com/S0272494401902270/1-s2.0-S0272494401902270-main.pdf?_tid=8c031 8b8-595b-11e4-81de-00000aab0f02&acdnat=1413921225_171d685e57b8c 23f1e46e5e6f50d80c2

Schultz, P. W. (2002). Inclusion with nature: Understanding the Psychology of human-nature interactions. In P. Schmuck & P. W. Schultz (Eds.), The Psychology of sustainable development (pp.61-78). New York: Kluwer.

Schultz, P. W., Shriver, C., Tabanico, J. J., & Khazian, A. M. (2004). Implicit connections with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(1), 31-42. Retrieved July 27, 2012, from http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0272494403000227/1-s2.0-S0272494403000227-main.pdf?_tid=c405b590-595b-11e4-92c3-00000aab0f27&acdnat=1413921319_fdb5148694305b47d d87fb0c302c2179

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). New York: Allyn & Bacon.

van der Ark, L. A. (2007). Mokken scale analysis in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 20(11), 1-19. Retrieved February 25, 2013, from http://www.jstatsoft.org/v20/i11/paper

Downloads

Publicado

2023-03-21

Como Citar

PESSOA, V. S., GOUVEIA, V. V., SOARES, A. K. S. ., VILAR, R., & FREIRES, L. A. (2023). Escala de conexão com a natureza: evidências psicométricas no contexto brasileiro. Estudos De Psicologia, 33(2). Recuperado de https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/estpsi/article/view/7865

Edição

Seção

AVALIAÇÃO PSICOLÓGICA