Connectedness to nature scale

Psychometric evidence in Brazil

Authors

  • Viviany Silva PESSOA Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Centro de Educação, Departamento de Psicopedagogia.
  • Valdiney Veloso GOUVEIA Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Centro de Ciências Humanas, Letras e Artes, Departamento de Psicologia.
  • Ana Karla Silva SOARES Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Centro de Ciências Humanas, Letras e Artes, Departamento de Psicologia.
  • Roosevelt VILAR Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Centro de Ciências Humanas, Letras e Artes, Departamento de Psicologia.
  • Leogildo Alves FREIRES Universidade Federal de Roraima, Centro de Educação, Departamento de Psicologia

Keywords:

Psychometric analysis, Connectedness to nature, Factorial validity

Abstract

This article aimed to gather evidence of validity and reliability of the Connectedness to Nature Scale in Brazil. Two studies were conducted. A total of 204 people of mean age 33 years (Standard Deviation = 13.83) participated in Study 1 and responded to the demographic questions and Connectedness to Nature Scale items. The results of the principal component analysis showed a one-factor structure (á = 0.81). Two hundred and twenty undergraduate students of mean age 23 years (Standard Deviation = 5.82) participated in Study 2 and responded to demographic questions; an adapted version of the Connectedness to Nature Scale was used. Confirmatory factor analysis (ML estimation) confirmed the adequacy of the one-factor structure (Comparative Fit Index = 0.91, Root-Mean-Square Error of Approximation = 0.064), indicating satisfactory internal consistency (á = 0.83). In conclusion, the Connectedness to Nature Scale proved to be a psychometrically appropriate measure to assess general connectedness to nature, and it can therefore be used in future studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Brown, T. A. (2003). Confirmatory fator analysis of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire: Multiple factors or method effects? Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41(12), 1411-1426. Retrieved October 17, 2014, from http://sws1.bu.edu/tabrown/Manuscripts/Brown%202003.pdf

Bruni, C. M., & Schultz, W. (2010). Implicit beliefs about self and nature: Evidence from an IAT game. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 95-102. Retrieved July 27, 2012, from http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0272494409000784/1-s2.0-S0272494409000784-main.pdf?_tid=0cc8757a-5956-11e4-8da0-00000aacb361&acdnat=1413918864_ae79755 a214c30f42aec9294f583e487

Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with Amos: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

Cervinka, R., Röderer K., & Hefler, E. (2012). Are nature lovers happy? On various indicators of well-being and connectedness with nature. Journal of Health Psychology, 17(3), 379-388. Retrieved January 29, 2013, from http://hpq.sagepub.com/content/17/3/379.full.pdf

Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309-319. Retrieved February 10, 2013, from http://lep.unige.ch/system/files/issas/files/clark_watson_1995_psychass.pdf

Coelho, J. A. P. M. (2009). Habilidade de conservação de água: uma explicação pautada em valores humanos, emoções e atitudes ambientais (Tese de doutorado em não-publicada). Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa. Recuperado em junho 28, 2013, de http://www.vvgouveia.net/en/images/Teses/Coelho_J._A._P._M._2009.pdf.pdf

Dunlap, R. E., & van Liere, K. D. (1978). The new environmental paradigm. Journal of Environmental Education, 9(4), 10-19.

Ellis, R. J., & Thompson, F. (1997). Culture and the environment in the pacific northwest. American Political Behavior, 91(4), 885-897. Retrieved July 28, 2012, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_ id=1123672

Gosling, E., & Williams, K. J. H. (2010). Connectedness to nature, place attachment and conservation behavior: Testing connectedness theory amongfarmers. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 298-304. Retrieved July 28, 2012, from http://ac.elscdn.com/S027249441000006X/1-s2.0-S027249441000006Xmain.pdf?_tid=004ffc7c-5957-11e4-8224-00000aab0f6b&acdnat=1413919273_3b9160974bc 45732e61dc2df7196e318

Gouveia, V. V. (2013). Teoria funcionalista dos valores: fundamentos, aplicações e perspectivas. São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo.

Hair Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2009). Análise multivariada de dados (6a ed.). Porto Alegre: Bookman.

Hakstian, A. R., & Whalen, T. E. (1976). A k-sample significance test for independent alpha coefficients. Psychometrika, 41(2), 219-231. Retrieved February 10, 2013, from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF02291840

Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7(2), 191-205. Retrieved February 15, 2013, from http://orm.sagepub.com/content/7/2/191.full.pdf+html

Hefler, E., Zeidler, D., & Cervinka, R. (2009). Connectedness with nature and support in life through spirituality. In H. Gutscher, H. J. Mosler, B. Meyer, S. Mischke, & M. Soland (Eds.), 8th Biennial Conference Environmental Psychology (pp.84). Zürich: Universität Zürich. Retrieved May 12, 2012, from http://www.meduniwien.ac.at/umwelthygiene/p018_cn_spirituality.pdf

Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modeling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60. Retrieved February 12, 2013, from http://arrow.dit.ie/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=buschmanart

Kaiser, F. G., & Wilson, M. (2004). Goal-directed conservation behavior: The specific composition of a general performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(7), 1531-1544. Retrieved June 29, 2012, from http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0191886903002460/1-s2.0-S0191886903002460-main.pdf?_tid=1b4c81ca-5958-11e4-8a3700000aab0f01&a cdnat=1413919747_9d64d89f694eb37fdde0397055dd1ac5

Kals, E., Schumacher, D., & Montada, L. (1999). Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior, 31(2), 178-202. Retrieved June 29, 2012, from http://eab.sagepub.com/content/31/2/178.full.pdf

Kim, S., & Feldt, L. S. (2008). A comparison of tests for equality of two or more independent alphacoefficients. Journal of Educational Measurement, 45(2), 179-193. Retrieved February 15, 2013, from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2008.00059.x/abstract

Maloney, M. P., & Ward, M. P. (1973). Ecology: Let’s hear from the people: An objective scale for measurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge. American Psychologist, 28(7), 583-586. Retrieved February 15,2013, from http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/amp/28/7/583.pdf

Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 503-515. Retrieved July 26, 2012, from http://gse.cat.org.uk/downloads/connectedness_to_nature_paper.pdf

Mokken, R. J., & Lewis, C. (1982). A nonparametric approach to the analysis of dichotomous item scores. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6(4), 417-430. Retrieved February 16, 2013, from http://conservancy.umn.edu/ bitstream/handle/11299/101545/1/v06n4p417.pdf

Olivos, P., Aragonés, J. I., & Amérigo, M. (2011). The connectedness to nature scale and its relationship with environmental beliefs and identity. International Journal of Hispanic Psychology, 4(1), 5-20. Retrieved July 25, 2012, from https://investigacion.uclm.es/documentos/fi_1331812710-olivos.aragones.amerigo.2011.connectedness.nature.sacle.pdf

Pasquali, L. (2003). Psicometria: teoria dos testes na Psicologia e na Educação. Petrópolis: Vozes.

Perrin, J. L., & Benassi, V. A. (2009). The connectedness to natures scale: A measure of emotional connection to nature? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(4), 434-440. Retrieved July 25, 2012, from http://ac.elscdn.com/S0272494409000243/1-s2.0-S027249440900 0243-main.pdf?_tid=152911ac-595b-11e4-ac2e-00000aab0f27&acdnat=1413921026_33260d97d0ad78ca2185795 cadd91633

Pessoa, V. V. (2011). Análise do conhecimento e das atitudes frente às fontes renováveis de energia: uma contribuição da Psicologia (Tese de Doutorado não-publicada). Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa. Recuperado em junho 28, 2012, de http://www.vvgouveia.net/en/images/Teses/Pessoa_V._S._2011.pdf.pdf

Primi, R., Muniz, M., & Nunes, C. H. S. S. (2009). Definições contemporâneas de validade de testes psicológicos.In C. S. Hutz (Org.), Avanços e polêmicas em avaliação psicológica (pp.243-266). São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo.

R Development Core Team. (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved February 25, 2013, from http://web.mit.edu/r_v3.0.1/fullrefman.pdf

Schultz, P. W. (2000). Empathizing with nature: The effects of perspective taking on concern for environmental issues. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 391-406. Retrieved July 27, 2012, from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/

Schultz, P. W. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(4), 327-339. Retrieved July 27, 2012, from http://ac.elscdn.com/S0272494401902270/1-s2.0-S0272494401902270-main.pdf?_tid=8c031 8b8-595b-11e4-81de-00000aab0f02&acdnat=1413921225_171d685e57b8c 23f1e46e5e6f50d80c2

Schultz, P. W. (2002). Inclusion with nature: Understanding the Psychology of human-nature interactions. In P. Schmuck & P. W. Schultz (Eds.), The Psychology of sustainable development (pp.61-78). New York: Kluwer.

Schultz, P. W., Shriver, C., Tabanico, J. J., & Khazian, A. M. (2004). Implicit connections with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(1), 31-42. Retrieved July 27, 2012, from http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0272494403000227/1-s2.0-S0272494403000227-main.pdf?_tid=c405b590-595b-11e4-92c3-00000aab0f27&acdnat=1413921319_fdb5148694305b47d d87fb0c302c2179

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). New York: Allyn & Bacon.

van der Ark, L. A. (2007). Mokken scale analysis in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 20(11), 1-19. Retrieved February 25, 2013, from http://www.jstatsoft.org/v20/i11/paper

Published

2023-03-21

How to Cite

PESSOA, V. S., GOUVEIA, V. V., SOARES, A. K. S. ., VILAR, R., & FREIRES, L. A. (2023). Connectedness to nature scale: Psychometric evidence in Brazil. Psychological Studies, 33(2). Retrieved from https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/estpsi/article/view/7865

Issue

Section

PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT