People with disabilities: Fighting for their rights in the USA and Brazil / Pessoas com deficiência: luta por seus direitos nos Estados Unidos e no Brasil

Authors

  • Carla Biancha Angelucci Universidade de São Paulo
  • Pamela Block Block Brook University
  • Larissa Costa dos Santos Universidade de São Paulo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24220/2318-0870v22n3a3837

Keywords:

People with disabilities. Social rights. Special Education.

Abstract

This study focuses on guaranteeing of the right to Education for people with disabilities, from the point of view of the human rights organization and the Special Education policy in two countries: United States of America and Brazil. The goal was to understand how the right to Education has been guaranteed to people with disabilities in these two countries. Since the law in the United States of America is organized at state level, New York was chosen as example. We made a comparative study not to produce a ranking that shows what is the best or worst way of committing to implement the right to education for people with disabilities, but rather to understand, through different political, cultural and social contexts, the ways in which such rights were brought forth in the law and in public policy design. We present a brief history of disability rights in the United States of America and Brazil. Then the Special Education policy in both countries is discussed, and some comments are made on Special Education in the state of New York. There are differences related to the idea of inclusion as adopted by each country, because political and legal organization in both countries differ significantly, especially about the definition of the target audience and the definition of the educational tools to beused. Both countries emphasize the participation of disability rights social movements in the creation and monitoring of public policies.

Keywords: People with disabilities. Social rights. Special Education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Carla Biancha Angelucci, Universidade de São Paulo

Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Educação, Departamento de Filosofia da Educação e Ciências da Educação. Av. da Universidade, 308, Bl. A, Sala 214, Cidade Universitária, 05508-040, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Pamela Block Block, Brook University

Stony Brook University School of Health and Technology and Management, Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Disability Studies Track. Stony Brook, NY, USA.

Larissa Costa dos Santos, Universidade de São Paulo

Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Educação, Departamento de Filosofia da Educação e Ciências da Educação. Av. da Universidade, 308, Bl. A, Sala 214, Cidade Universitária, 05508-040, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

References

Ben-Moshe, L.; Chapman, C.; Carey, A. Disability incarcerated. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2014.

Block, P. et al. Occupying disability: Critical approaches to community, justice, and decolonizing disability. New York: Springer, 2016.

Brasil. Decreto legislativo nº 186, de 24 de dezembro de 2008. Aprova o texto da Convenção sobre os Direitos das Pessoas com Deficiência e seu protocolo facultativo. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, 2008a.

Brasil. Política nacional de educação especial na perspectiva da educação inclusiva. Brasília: MEC, 2008b. Disponível em: <http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2007-2010/2009/decreto/d6949.htm>. Acesso em: 16 set. 2013.

Brasil. Resolução nº 4, de 2 de outubro de 2009: Institui Diretrizes Operacionais para o Atendimento Educacional Especializado na Educação Básica, modalidade Educação Especial. Brasília: MEC, 2009.

Brasil. História do movimento político das pessoas com deficiência no Brasil. Brasília: Secretaria de Direitos Humanos, 2010. Brasil. Decreto nº 7.611, de 17 de novembro de 2011. Dispõe sobre a educação especial, o atendimento educacional especializado e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, 18 nov. 2011.

Brasil. Ministério da Educação. Nota técnica nº 4 / 2013. MEC / SECADI / DPEE: Orientação quanto a documentos comprobatórios de alunos com deficiência, transtornos globais do desenvolvimento e altas habilidades/superdotação no Censo Escolar. Brasília: MEC, 2014a.

Brasil. Decreto nº 8.368, de 2 de dezembro de 2014. Regulamenta a Lei nº 12.764, de 27 de dezembro de 2012, que institui a Política de Proteção dos Direitos da Pessoa com Transtorno do Espectro Autista. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, 3 dez. 2014b. Disponível em: <http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2014/Decreto/D8368.htm>. Acesso em: 20 out. 2015.

Brasil. Conferência Nacional de Direitos das Pessoas com Deficiência, 4., Brasília. Anais... Brasília: Secretaria de Direitos Humanos, 2016. Disponível em: <http://www.sedese.mg.gov.br/ conped/images/conferencias/Anais_confrencia.pdf>.

Acesso em: 26 nov. 2016.

Carey, A. On the margins of citizenship. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2009.

Cohen, A. Imbeciles: The Supreme Court, american eugenics, and the sterilization of Carrie Buck. New York: Penguin Books, 2016.

Crespo, A.M. Movimento social e político das pessoas com deficiência: da invisibilidade à construção da própria cidadania. Oralidades, ano 6, n.11, p.199-219, 2012.

Erevelles, N. Disability and difference in global contexts: Enabling a transformative body politic. New York: Palgrave

MacMillan, 2014.

Fleischer, D.Z.; Zames, F. The Disability rights movement: Fromcharity to confrontation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2011.

Franco, M.C. Quando nós somos o outro: questões teórico metodológicas sobre os estudos comparados. Educação & Sociedade, v.21, n.72, p.197-230, 2000. Disponível em: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-73302000000300011>.

Goddard, H.H. The Kallikak family: A study in the heredity of feeble mindedness. New York: Macmillan, 1912.

Grace, E. Are you neuroqueer? Neuroqueer, 2013. Available from: <http://neuroqueer.blogspot.ca/2013/09/are-youneuroqueer.html> Cited: Aug. 17, 2016.

Kafer, A. Feminist, queer, crip. Indiana: Indiana University Press, 2013.

Koestler, F.A. The unseen minority: A social history of blindness in the United States. Huntindon WV: AFB Press, 2004.

Kulick, D.; R., J. Loneliness and its opposite: Sex, disability, and the ethics of engagement. Durham (NC): Duke University Press, 2015. Levinson, J. Making life work. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2010.

Linton, S. Claiming disability. New York: NYU Press, 1998.

Lüdke, M. André, M.E.D.A. Pesquisa em educação: abordagens qualitativas. São Paulo: E.P.U., 1986.

Mingus, M. Reflections on an opening: Disability justice and creating collective access in Detroit: On incite women of color against violence. INCITE! Blog, 2010. Available from: <https://inciteblog.wordpress.com/2010/08/23/reflections-fromdetroit-reflections-on-an-opening-disability-justice-andcreating-collective-access-in-detroit/>. Cited: Sept. 7, 2016.

New York. Regulations of the Commissioner of Education: Part 200: Students with disabilities. New York: The State Education Department, 2016. Available from: <http://www.p12.nysed.gov/specialed/lawsregs/part200.htm>. Cited: Sept. 7, 2016.

New York. Section 200.3 Committee on special education and committee on preschool special education. New York: The State Education Department, 2015. Available from: <http://www.p12.nysed.gov/specialed/lawsregs/sect2003.htm>. Cited: Sept. 7, 2016.

Palacios, A. El modelo social de discapacidad: orígenes, caracterización y plasmación en la Convención Internacional sobre los Derechos de las personas con Discapacidad. Madrid: Grupo Editorial, 2008.

Perry, D.M.; Carter-Long, L. Media coverage law enforcement use of force and disability. Ruderman Family Foundation, mar., p.1-42, 2016. Available from: <http://www.rudermanfoundation.org/news-and-events/rudermanwhite-paper>. Cited: Sept. 22, 2016.

Rivera, G. Willowbrook: A report on how it is and why it doesn’t have to be that way. New York: Vintage Books, 1972.

Rothstein, L.F.; Mcginley, A.C. Disability law: Cases, materials, problems. Albany: Lexisnexis, 2010. Scotch, R. From good will to civil rights: Transforming federal disability policy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2001.

Shah, R.; Giannasi, P. Tackling disability discrimination and disability hate crime: A multidisciplinary guide. Philadelphia:

Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2015.

Skrtic, T. A injustiça institucionalizada: construção e uso da deficiência na escola. In: Bueno, J.; Munakata K.; Chiozzini, D. A escola como objeto de estudo: escola, desigualdade e diversidade. Araraquara: Junqueira & Marin, 2014.

Trent, J. Inventing the feeble mind: A history of mental retardation in the united states. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995.

United States of America. Section 504, Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 USC §701). Washington (DC): Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management, 1973.

United States of America. Office of Special Education Programs. Sec. 300.8 Child with a disability, Building the Legacy. Washington (DC): Department of Education, 2004. Available from: <http://idea.ed.gov/explore/view/p/,root,regs,300,A,300.8,.html>. Cited: Sept. 22, 2016.

United States of America. Office of Special Education Programs. Idea Regulations: Identification of specific learning disabilities. Washington (DC): Department of Education, 2006. Available from: < idea.ed.gov/uploads/Identification_

of_SLD_10-4-06.doc>. Cited: Sept. 22, 2016.

Van Cleve, J.V. The deaf history reader. Washington (DC.): Gallaudet University Press, 2007.

Wiegerink, R.; Pelosi, J.W. Developmental disabilities: The dd movement. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes, 1979.

Published

2017-10-20

How to Cite

Angelucci, C. B., Block, P. B., & Santos, L. C. dos. (2017). People with disabilities: Fighting for their rights in the USA and Brazil / Pessoas com deficiência: luta por seus direitos nos Estados Unidos e no Brasil. Revista De Educação PUC-Campinas, 22(3), 339–355. https://doi.org/10.24220/2318-0870v22n3a3837

Issue

Section

Thematic Section: Special Education: Contemporary trends and challenges