A DIMENSÃO RETÓRICA DA RACIONALIDADE CIENTÍFICA
Palabras clave:
réthorique scientifique, rationalité scientifiqueResumen
II y a un croissant interêt à la rhétorlque scientifique dans la PhilosophÊe des Sciences de I'actualité, mais la défense de la
rhétorique semble souvent un attaque à la rationatité scientifique Cet article présente les principaux aspects rhétoriques de l'argumentation scientifÊque et défend que I'admission de la rhétorique, loin de menacer ta ratÊonalité de la science. I'éclaire
et la renforce.
Descargas
Citas
BAZERMAN, Charles (1988)Shaping Written Knowledge. Madison-London :The Univ. of Winsconsin Press.
Bloor, David (1980; orig. 1976) Knowledge and Social Imaginery. London-Boston : Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Bunge, Mario (1985) Racionalidad y Realismo. Madrid: Alianza.
BUNGE, Mario (1991) "Una caricatura de la ciencia: la novísima sociologia de la ciencia" Interciencia 16:69-77.
CU PANI, Alberto (1990) "Porque não Feyerabend?Reflexão 47: 115-121
CUPANI, Alberto (1994) "A Filosofia da Ciência de Larry Laudan e a crítica do 'Positivismo' ". Manuscrito, XVI1(1): 91-143.
FEYERABEND, Paul (1994; orig. 1975)Against Method. London-New York: Verso.
FINOCCHIARO, Mauricio (1980) Galileo and the Art of Reasoning. Rhetorical Foundations of Logic and Scientific Method. Dord recht: Reidel.
GILBERT, Nigel (1973) '’Referencing as Persuasion". Soc. Stud. of Sci., 7:113-122.
GROSS, alan G. (1990) The Rhetoric of Science. Cambridge, Mass-London: Harvard University Press.
KITCHEF3, Philip (1991) "Persuaslon", in Pera, M. e Shea, W. (eds) Persuading Science, pp. 3-27.
KUHN, Thomas S. (1970; orig. 1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: ChIcago Univ. Press.
KUHN, Thomas S. (1977) "Objectivity, Value Judgements and Theory Choice", in: Kuhn, Th. S. The Essential Tension. Chicago-London: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 320-339.
LATOUFR, B. e Woolgar, S. (1986; orig. 1979) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton. NJ: Princeton University Press.
LAUDAN, Larry (1977) Progress and its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth. Berkeley-Los Angeles-London: University of California Press.
PERA, Marcello (1988) "Breaking the Link Between Methodology and Rationality. A PleaforRhetoric in Scientific Inquiry in: Batens, D. e Van BENDEGEM, J. P. (eds) Theory and Experiment. Dordrecht-Boston: D. Reidel, pp. 259-276.
PERA, Marcello (1991) "The Role and Value of Rhetoric inscience", in: Pera, M. e Shea, W. (eds) Persuading Science, pp. 29-53.
PERA, Marcello (1994) The Discourses of Science (trad. do orig. ital. "Scienza e Retorica"). Chicago-London: The Univ. of Chicago Press.
PERA, M. e Shea, W. (eds) (1991) Persuading Science. The Art of Scientific Rhetoric. Carlton, MA: science History Pub. U.S.A.
PRELLI, Lawrence J. (1989)A Rhetoric of Science. Inventing Seientific Discourse. ColumbÊa: Univ. of Carolina Press.
RAVETZ, Jerry (1971 )Scientific Knowledge and its Social Problems. New York: Oxford.
SANDERS, Robert (1990) "Discoursive Constraints on the Acceptance of Knowledge Claims: The Conversation about Conversation", in: Simons, H. (ed) The Rhetorical Turn, pp. 145-161.
SHAPIN, Steve (1984) "Pump and Circumsance: Robert Boyle's Literary Technology". Soc. Stud. ofSci. 14:481-520.
SIMONS, Herbert (ed) (1990) The Rhetorical Turn. Invention and Persuation in the Conduct of Inquiry. Chicago-London: The Univ. of Chicago Press.
BROWN, Harold (1984) La Nueva Filosofia de la Ciencia (’'Perception and Commitment: The New Philosophy of Science", 1977). Madrid: Tecnos.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Alberto CUPANI
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
