RAZÓN Y VERDAD EN EL MARCO DEL IDEALISMO TRASCENDENTAL
Abstract
The major thrust of CRITIQUE OF PURE REASON is not to define the limits in human knowledge but to show that reason constitutes and sets up the confines of all possibles truth. From Kant ’s perspective, there cannot be either knowledge or truth separate from the domain of reason. Accordingly, the role of critical philosophy is not to persuade about our lack of competence to achieve knowledge of supra-sensible matters, but to reveal that any question can be addressed thought reason, be ü in an speculative or critical manner.
Downloads
References
CASSIRER, E. ( 1956): EI Problema del Conocimiento ll. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica
DUMMETT, M. (1981): The Interpretation of Frege’s Philosophy. London: Duckworth.
HEIDEGGER, IVI. (1985):La Pregunta por la Cosa. Buenos Aires: Orbis.
KAIVF, l. (1956): Kritik der Reinen Vernunft (A/B). Hamburg: F. Meiner.
KANT, 1. (1976): Prolegomena (Pr) . Hamburg: F. Meiner, KÔRNER, S. (1983):Kant. Madrid: Alianza.
LOPARJC, Z. (1983): “Heurística Kantiana”. Cadernos de Historia e Filosofia da Ciência V. CLE/UNICAMP.
POPPER, K. ( 1974): Lógica dela Investigación Científica. Madrid: Tecnos.
POPPER, K. ( 1984.Madr): Tolerancia y Responsabilidad Intelectual. Madrid: Tecnos.
RODHEN, V. (1988): “Ceticismo vs. Condições de verdade”. Manuscrito XI-2.CLE/UNICAMP
TORRETTI, R. (1980):Kant. Buenos Aires: Charcas.
WITTGENSTEIN, L. (1978): Tractatus Logica-Philosophicus. Madrid: Alianza.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Gustavo CAPONI

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.









