RAZÓN Y VERDAD EN EL MARCO DEL IDEALISMO TRASCENDENTAL

Authors

  • Gustavo CAPONI UFSC

Abstract

The major thrust of CRITIQUE OF PURE REASON is not to define the limits in human knowledge but to show that reason constitutes and sets up the confines of all possibles truth. From Kant ’s perspective, there cannot be either knowledge or truth separate from the domain of reason. Accordingly, the role of critical philosophy is not to persuade about our lack of competence to achieve knowledge of supra-sensible matters, but to reveal that any question can be addressed thought reason, be ü in an speculative or critical manner.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

CASSIRER, E. ( 1956): EI Problema del Conocimiento ll. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica

DUMMETT, M. (1981): The Interpretation of Frege’s Philosophy. London: Duckworth.

HEIDEGGER, IVI. (1985):La Pregunta por la Cosa. Buenos Aires: Orbis.

KAIVF, l. (1956): Kritik der Reinen Vernunft (A/B). Hamburg: F. Meiner.

KANT, 1. (1976): Prolegomena (Pr) . Hamburg: F. Meiner, KÔRNER, S. (1983):Kant. Madrid: Alianza.

LOPARJC, Z. (1983): “Heurística Kantiana”. Cadernos de Historia e Filosofia da Ciência V. CLE/UNICAMP.

POPPER, K. ( 1974): Lógica dela Investigación Científica. Madrid: Tecnos.

POPPER, K. ( 1984.Madr): Tolerancia y Responsabilidad Intelectual. Madrid: Tecnos.

RODHEN, V. (1988): “Ceticismo vs. Condições de verdade”. Manuscrito XI-2.CLE/UNICAMP

TORRETTI, R. (1980):Kant. Buenos Aires: Charcas.

WITTGENSTEIN, L. (1978): Tractatus Logica-Philosophicus. Madrid: Alianza.

Published

1998-04-30

How to Cite

CAPONI, G. (1998). RAZÓN Y VERDAD EN EL MARCO DEL IDEALISMO TRASCENDENTAL. Reflexão, 23(70). Retrieved from https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/reflexao/article/view/10869