Fruits and vegetables: technical recommendations versus social constructs
Keywords:
culture, nutrition programmes and policies, risk, sociology, vegetablesAbstract
Goal recommendations and prescriptions addressed to the population are often constructed based exclusively on technical-scientific definitions, ignoring social constructive processes of the risk that involves values, perceptions and experiences. Thus, important barriers may impair the advancement of policies that aim to implement these recommendations. This article presents multidisciplinary contributions to the construction of prescribed recommendations and goals, especially concerning the consumption of fruits and vegetables. It discusses some psychosocial and macro-structural barriers for the consumption of these foods and their implications for population-based interventions. With the objective of inducing reflection, the article conducts
a critical review analyzing the problem under the light of structuralist theories on the social construction of risk. Recommendations and prescriptions of goals were analyzed considering the risk, its social determinants, components and concepts aggregated as multidimensional factors. Important lessons drawn from the review include: 1) the need to incorporate popular contributions to the definition, content, strategies of communication and implementation of the food policy agenda; 2) the vital need to recover the non-nutritional aspects of the foods, such as taste, as indispensable components to value and promote the consumption of fruits and
vegetables; and 3) the need to adopt a concept of healthy eating that follows the broadness of the concept of health. The analysis indicates that the messages need to approach and value culture and tradition, avoiding references to healthy eating that are essentially or exclusively based on nutrients, diseases, longevity and sophistication.
References
World Health Organization. Resolution WHA57.17. Global strategy on diet, physical activity and health. Proceedings of the 57th World Health Assembly; 2004 22 May. Geneva: WHO; 2004.
World Health Organization. The World Health Report 2003. Shaping the future. Geneva: WHO; 2003.
World Health Organization. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases. Geneva: WHO; 1990.
Lock K, Pomerleau J, Causer L, Altmann DR, McKee M. The global burden of disease attributable to low consumption of fruit and vegetables: implications for the global strategy on diet. Bull World Health Organ. 2005; 83(2):100-8.
World Health Organization. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. Expert Report on Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases. Geneva: World Health Organization/Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations; 2003. WHO Technical Report Series 916.
Vainio H, Bianchini F. IARC Handbooks of cancer prevention: fruit and vegetables. Lyon: IARC Press; 2003.
Renn O. Concepts of risk: a classification. In: Krimsky S, Golding D, editors. Social theories of risk. London: Praeger; 1992.
Giddens A. The Consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1990.
Douglas M, Wildavsky A. Risk and culture. An essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1982.
Wildavsky A. Public policy. In: Davis B, editor. The genetic revolution: scientific prospects and public perceptions. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press; 1991.
Freire P. Pedagogia do oprimido. São Paulo: Paz e Terra; 1993.
Mezirow J. Fostering critical reflection in adulthood. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1991.
Kriflik LS, Yeatman H. Food scares and sustainability: a consumer perspective. Health Risk Soc. 2005; 7(1):11-24.
Frewer LJ, Howard C, Hedderley D, Shepherd R. What determines trust in information about food related risks? Underlying psychological constructs. Risk Anal. 1996; 16(4):473-86.
Frewer LJ, Miles S. Temporal stability of the psychological determinants of trust: Implications for communication about food risks. Health Risk Soc. 2003; 5(3):259-71.
Smith AP, Young JA, Gibson J. Consumer information and BSE: credibility and edibility. Risk Decis Policy. 1997; 2(1):41-51.
Gutteling JM, Wiegman O. The source of risk messages. In: Gutteling JM, Wiegman O, editors. Exploring risk communication. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1996.
Peters RG, Covello VT, McCallum DB. The determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication: an empirical study. Risk Anal. 1997; 17(1):43-54.
Renn O, Levine D. Credibility and trust in risk communication. In: Kasperson RE, Stallen PJM, editors. Communicating risks to the public. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1991.
Johnson B. Exploring dimensionality in the origins of hazard-related trust. J Risk Res. 1999; 2(4): 325-54.
Veríssimo LF. A mesa voadora. Rio de Janeiro: Objetiva; 2001.
Elias N. O processo civilizador 1: uma história dos costumes. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar; 1994.
Frank A. For a sociology of the body: an analytical review. In: Featherstone M, Hepworth M, Turner BS, editors. The body social process and cultural theory. London: Sage; 1992.
Halkier B. Risk and food: environmental concerns and consumer practices. Int J Food Sci Tech. 2001; 36(5):801-12.
Foucault M. The History of Sexuality. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books; 1978.
Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. Increasing fruit and vegetable consumption becomes a global priority [cited 2006 Mar 27]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/english/newsroom/focus/2003/fruitveg1.htm
World Cancer Research Fund. American Institute for Cancer Research. Food, nutrition and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. Washington (DC): American Institute for Cancer Research; 1997.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National 5 A Day Partnership Plan 2001-2004. Atlanta: National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 2002.
Department of Health. The NHS Plan: a plan for investment. A plan for reform. London: The Stationery Office; 2000.
Kuhn TS. A estrutura das revoluções científicas. 5a. ed. São Paulo: Perspectiva; 1993.
Giddens A. In Defence of sociology: essays, interpretations, and rejoinders. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1996.
Boyer P. Tradition as truth and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990.
Weber M. Economy and society. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1978.
Valla VV. Procurando compreender a fala das classes populares. In: Valla VV, organizador. Saúde e Educação. Rio de Janeiro: DP&A; 2000.
Peregrino M. Picada, beco, vielas: caminhos do saber [dissertação]. Niterói: Universidade Federal Fluminense; 1995.
Cunha MB. Parque proletário, grotão e outras moradas: saber e história nas favelas da Penha [dissertação]. Niterói: Universidade Federal Fluminense; 1995.
Gomes FS. Segurança alimentar e nutricional. In: Gomes FS, organizador. Culinária social. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Victus; 2004.
Castro J. Geografia da fome. Rio de Janeiro: Cruzeiro; 1946.
Valente FLS. Do combate à fome à segurança alimentar e nutricional: o direito à alimentação adequada. In: Valente FLS, editor. Direito humano à alimentação: desafios e conquistas. São Paulo: Cortez; 2002.
Garcia RWD. Reflexos da globalização na cultura alimentar: considerações sobre as mudanças na alimentação urbana. Rev Nutr. 2003; 16(4): 483-92.
Bruno M. Crescimento econômico, mudanças estruturais e distribuição, as transformações do regime de acumulação no Brasil - uma análise regulacionista [tese]. Paris e Rio de Janeiro: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales e Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; 2002.
García M, Fernández E, Borràs JM, Nieto FJ, Schiaffino A, Peris M, et al. Cancer risk perceptions in an urban Mediterranean population. Int J Cancer. 2005; 117(1):132-6.
Williams PRD, Hammitt JK. Perceived risk of conventional and organic produce: pesticides, pathogens and natural toxins. Risk Anal. 2001; 21(2):319-30.
Nyland LG. Risk Perception in Brazil and Sweden. RHIZIKON: risk research report No. 15. Stockholm: Stockholm School of Economics; 1993.
Bronfman NC, Cifuentes LA. Risk perception in a developing country: the case of Chile. Risk Anal. 2003; 23(6):1271-85.
Brasil. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Diretoria de alimentos e toxicologia. Gerência geral de toxicologia. Controlando os agrotóxicos nos alimentos. Relatório de Atividades 2001-2004. Brasília: Anvisa; 2005.
Low F, Lin HM, Gerrard JA, Cressey PJ, Shaw IC. Ranking the risk of pesticide dietary intake. Pest Manag Sci. 2004; 60(9):842-8.
Nóbrega AW. Um esforço para garantir a segurança alimentar nacional: o programa de análise de resíduos de agrotóxicos - PARA. In: Peres F, Moreira JC, organizadores. É veneno ou é remédio: agrotóxicos, saúde e ambiente. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz; 2003.
Baudrillard J. Le Systéme des objets: la consommation des signes. Paris: Denoel/Gonthier; 1968.
Baudrillard J. Simulations. New York: Semiotext(e); 1983.
Gomes FS, Azeredo RR, Ramos RG, Gugelmin SA. Saucepan Revelry: Nourishing Citizenship. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Local and Regional Health Programmes; 2004 Oct; Canada, Québec; 2004. Abstract 165. Available from: http://archives.colloquequebec2004.com/Detail.aspx?lang=EN&actNo=308
Draper A, Green J. Food safety and consumers: constructions of choice and risk. Social Policy Adm. 2002; 36(6):610-25.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Fabio da Silva GOMES
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
