Cost-effectiveness applied to hygienic-sanitary aspects of collective meals production in cook-chill and traditional systems

Authors

  • Vera Megumi KAWASAKI Universidade de São Paulo
  • Denise Cavallini CYRILLO Universidade de São Paulo
  • Flávia Mori Sarti MACHADO Universidade de São Paulo

Keywords:

cost efficiency analysis, cost control, food services

Abstract

Objective
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost efficiency relationship from two food services from Sao Paulo city that adopt different collective meals production systems (conventional and cook-chill).

Methods
The method employed was based on cost efficiency analysis, using time and temperature criteria established in Brazilian laws as efficiency indicators for safety in hygiene and sanitary aspects of the collective meals production systems. Costs were calculated through the differential direct cost method, using as basis the costs of inputs that were exclusive to each production system.

Results
The results demonstrated that the differential direct cost from food services that adopted the conventional production system (food service unit1) was R$0.69 per meal, while the cost of food services that adopted the cook-chill production system (food service unit 2) was R$2.66 per meal. In terms of effectiveness, food service unit 1 achieved an accomplishment level of 27.9% in time and temperature criteria, while food service unit 2 achieved an accomplishment level of 68.2%. The most cost-effective alternative was the conventional production system represented by food service unit 1, with a cost-efficiency ratio of 2.484; while food service unit 2
obtained a cost efficiency ratio of 3.907.

Conclusion
The main transgression causes in food safety criteria detected in both food services were related to procedures that seek improvements in sensory quality and economy instead of safety and there was little relationship between the inherent differences of the adopted production system. Critical stages can be controlled by monitoring food temperature, a low cost procedure with a high potential of improving efficiency performance in the production of safe meals. 

References

Silva Jr EA. Manual de controle higiênico-sanitário em alimentos. 4a.ed. São Paulo: Varela; 2001.

Gandra YR, Gambardella AMD. Avaliação de serviços de nutrição e alimentação. São Paulo: Sarvier; 1983.

Nieto RA, Vega IF, Viesti I, Kamamura H, Gambardella AMD. Modelo para análise do sistema decisório num serviço de nutrição. Rev Adm. 1986; 21(3):32-9.

Proença RPC. Inovação tecnológica na produção de alimentação coletiva. Florianópolis: Insular; 1997.

Kinton R, Ceserani V, Foshett D. Enciclopédia de serviços de alimentação. São Paulo: Varela; 1998.

Kaud FA. Implementing the chilled food concept. Hospitals. 1972; 46:97.

Lacey RW. The cook-chill crisis. Med Leg J. 1990; 88(1):18-28.

Kawasaki VM. Custo-efetividade da produção de refeições coletivas seguras sob o aspecto higiênico-sanitário em sistemas cook-chill e tradicional [dissertação]. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo; 2003.

Cohen E, Franco R. Evaluación de proyectos sociales. Buenos Aires: Grupo Editor Latinoamericano; 1988.

São Paulo. Portaria CVS nº.6 de 10 de março de 1999. Aprova o regulamento técnico que estabelece os parâmetros e critérios para o controle higiênico-sanitário em estabelecimento de alimentos. Diário Oficial do Estado de São Paulo. 1999 12 mar; Seção I: 24-27.

International Association of Milk, Food and Environmental Sanitarians. Guia de procedimentos para implantação do método de análise de perigos e pontos críticos de controle. São Paulo: Ponto Crítico; 1997.

Cyrillo DC. Reconstruindo instituições: o caso da norma brasileira para comercialização de alimentos para lactentes (NBCAL) [tese de livre docência]. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo; 2001.

Teichmann ITM. Tecnologia culinária. Caxias do Sul: EDUCS; 2000.

Philippi ST. Nutrição e técnica dietética. Barueri: Manole; 2003.

Associação Brasileira das Empresas de Refeições Coletivas [acesso em 17 fev 2003]. Disponível em: http://www.aberc.com.br

Blakeslee KM, Penner KP. A case study of a school foodservice cook-chil operation to develop a hazerd analysis critical control point program. Dairy Food Environ Sanit. 1999; 19(4):257-67.

Greatouse KR, Gregoire MB, Spears MC, Richards V, Nassar RF. Comparison of conventional, cookchill and fook-freeze foodservice systems. J Am Diet Assoc. 1989; 89(11):1066-611.

Nettles MF, Gregoire MB. Operational characteristics of hospital foodservice departments with conventional, cook-chill and cook-freeze systems. J Am Diet Assoc. 1993; 93(10):1161-63.

Herz ML, Souder Jr JJ. Preparation systems have significant effect on costs. Hospitals. 1979; 53(1):89-92.

McProud LM, David BD. Energy use and management in production of entrées in hospital food service systems. J Am Diet Assoc. 1982; 81(8):145-50.

Published

2023-09-06

How to Cite

Megumi KAWASAKI, V., Cavallini CYRILLO, D. ., & Sarti MACHADO, F. M. . (2023). Cost-effectiveness applied to hygienic-sanitary aspects of collective meals production in cook-chill and traditional systems. Brazilian Journal of Nutrition, 20(2). Retrieved from https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/9660

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLE