Outcomes of the implementation of an enteral nutrition algorithm in children and adolescents with cancer

Authors

  • Adriana GARÓFOLO Universidade Federal de São Paulo
  • Priscila Santos MAIA Universidade Federal de São Paulo
  • Antonio Sérgio PETRILLI Universidade Federal de São Paulo
  • Fábio ANCONA-LOPEZ Universidade Federal de São Paulo

Keywords:

Algorithm, Neoplasms, Enteral nutrition, Nutritional support

Abstract

Objective
This study aimed to describe the algorithm and the global results after its implementation.

Methods
This was a randomized clinical trial done with malnourished cancer patients. Follow-up followed an algorithm and patients with mild malnutrition were randomized to receive store-bought or homemade oral supplementation. The patients were reassessed after three, eight and twelve weeks. Depending on how the group supplemented with store-bought supplements responded, the supplementation was either continued orally, by tube-feeding or discontinued. The group receiving homemade supplementation either continued on it if the response was positive or received store-bought oral supplementation if the response was negative. The
severely malnourished patients either received store-bought supplementation by feeding tube or orally, or it was discontinued if an adequate nutritional status was reached. The patients’ responses to supplementation were determined by weight-for-height Z-scores, body mass indices, triceps skinfold thicknesses and circumferences.

Results
One hundred and seventeen out of 141 patients completed the first three weeks; 58 were severely malnourished and 59 were mildly malnourished. The nutritional status of 41% of the severely malnourished patients and 97% of the mildly malnourished patients receiving store-bought supplement orally improved. The nutritional status of 77% of the mildly malnourished patients receiving homemade supplement orally also improved. Of the 117 patients, 42 had to be tube-fed; of these, 23 accepted and 19 refused tube feeding and continued taking store-bought supplement orally. Consumption of store-bought supplement was higher in tube-fed
patients than in orally-fed patients. Consumption also increased as orally-fed patients became tube-fed. Store-bought supplements given by tube improved nutritional status, showing a positive association between duration of tube feeding and nutritional status.

Conclusion
Store-bought oral supplements improved the nutrient intake of malnourished patients, especially those who were mildly malnourished. The results also suggest that store-bought supplements given by tube improve nutritional status, especially as duration of tube feeding increases.

References

Rodrigues KM, Camargo. Diagnóstico precoce do câncer infantil: responsabilidade de todos. Rev Assoc Med Bras, 2003; 49(1):29-34.

Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Câncer Pediátrico. Situação do Câncer no Brasil. Disponível em: .

Garófolo A, Caran EM, Silva NS, Lopez FA. Prevalência de desnutrição em crianças com tumores sólidos. Braz J Nutr. 2005;18(2):193-200.

Ladas EJ, Sacks N, Meacham L, Henry D, Enriquez L, Lowry G, et al. A Multidisciplinary Review of Nutrition Considerations in the Pediatric Oncology Population: A Perspective From Children’s Oncology Group. Nutr Clin Pract. 2005; 20(4):377-93.

Segura A, Pardo J, Jara C, Zugazabeitia L, Carulla J, Penas R, et al. An epidimiological evaluation of the prevalence of malnutrition in Spanish patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancer. Clin Nutr. 2005 24(5):801-14.

Rivadeneira DE, Evoy D, Fahey TJ, Lieberman MD, Daly JM. Nutritional support of the câncer patient. Cancer J Clin. 1998; 48(2):69-80.

Moynihan T, Kelly DG, Fich M J. To feed or not to feed: is that the right question? J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23(25):6256-9.

Garófolo A. Estado nutricional de crianças e adolescentes com câncer [tese]. São Paulo: Universidade Federal de São Paulo; 2000.

Garófolo A, Lopez FA, Petrilli AS. High prevalence of malnutrition in solid non-hematological cancer patients by using skinfold and circumference measures. São Paulo Med J. 2005b; 123(6):277-81.

Garófolo A, Lopez FA, Petrilli AS. Terapia nutricional em oncologia pediátrica. Pediatr Mod. 2001; 37(9): 413-27.

Garófolo A, Lopez FA, Petrilli AS. Acompanhamento do estado nutricional de pacientes com osteossarcoma. Acta Oncol Bras. 2002; 22(1): 233-7.

Garófolo A, Aragão KSM, Maia PS, Lopez FA, Petrilli AS. Suplementação oral e resposta do estado nutricional em crianças e adolescentes com câncer. Braz J Clin Nutr. 2002;17(1):1-8.

Bowman LC, Williams R, Sanders M, Smith K, Baker D, Gajjar A. Algorithm for nutritional support: experience of the metabolic and infusion support service of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital. Int J Cancer. 1998; 11:76-80S.

Children’s Oncology Group Cancer Control - Nutrition Sub-Committee. Algorithm for nutrition intervention and categories of nutritional status in the pediatric oncology patient-references and resources. In: Children’s Oncology Group. Symposium, 2004; Washington (DC).

Sala A, Antillon F, Pencharz P, Barr R. Nutritional status in children with cancer: a report from the AHOPCA workshop held in Guatemala city, August 31-Septmber 5, 2004. Pediatric Blood Cancer. 2005; 45:230-36.

World Health Organization. Management of severe malnutrition: a manual for physicians and other senior health workers: malnutrition in adolescents and adults. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1999.

Frisancho AR. Antropometric standards for the assessment of growth and nutritional status. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press; 1993.

World Health Organization. Energy and protein requirements. Report of a joint FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1985. Technical Report Series 724.

Harris JA, Benedict F. A biometric study of basal metabolism in man. Washington (DC): Carnegie Institute of Washington; 1919.

St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital. Clinical Nutrition Services. Clinical Practice Guidelines. Menphis (USA): St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital; 2001. Section IV.

ASPEN Board of Directors and the Clinical Guidelines Task Force. Guidelines for the use of parenteral and enteral nutrition in adult and pediatric patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2002; 26(1 Suppl):1SA-138SA.

Dawson B, Trapp RG. Epi info [computer program] Version NCSS/PASS 2000: statistical software Dawson edition. Rio de Janeiro: McGraw-Hill; 2003.

Linnard-Palmer L, Kools S. Parents’ refusal of medical treatment for cultural or religious beliefs: an ethnographic study of health care professionals’ experiences. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2005; 22(1):48-57.

Kyle UG, Pirlich M, Schuetz T, Lochs H, Pichard C. Is nutritional depletion by nutritional risk index (NRI) associated with increased length of stay (LOS): a population study. JPEN. 2004; 28 (2): 99-104.

Rogers PC, Melnick SJ, Ladas EJ, Halton J, Baillargeon J, Sacks N. Children’s Oncology Group (COG) Nutrition Committee. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2008; 50(Suppl 2):447-50.

Bakish J, Hargrave D, Tariq N, Laperriere N, Rutka JT, Bouffet E. Evaluation of dietetic intervention in children with medulloblastoma or supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumors. Cancer. 2003; 98(5):1014-20.

Papadopoulou A, Macdonald A, Williams MD, Darbyshike PJ, Booth IW. Enteral nutrition after bone marrow transplantation. Arch Dis Child. 1997; 77(2):131-6.

Hastings Y, White M, Young J. Enteral nutrition and bone marrow transplantation. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2006; 23:103-10.

Langdana A, Tully N, Molloy E, Bourke B, O’Meia A. Intensive enteral nutrition support in pediatric bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplantation. 2001; 27(7):741-6.

Barron MA, Ducan DS, Green GJ, Modrusan D, Connolly B, Chait P, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Radiologically Placed Gastrostomy Tubes in Paediatric Haematology/Oncology Patients. Med Pediatr Oncol. 2000; 34:177-82.

Aquino VM, Smyrl CB, Hagg R, McHard KM, Prestridge L, Sandler, ES. Enteral nutricional support by gastrostomy tube in children with cancer. J Pediatr. 1995; 127(1):58-62.

den Broeder E, Lippens RJ, van’t Hof MA, Tolboom JJ, Sengers RCA, van den Berg AMJ, et al. Nasogastric tube feeding in children with cancer: the effect of two different formulas on weight, body composition, and serum protein concentrations. J Parent Ent Nutr. 2000; 24(6):351-60.

Pietsch JB, Ford C, Whitlock JA. Nasogastric tube feeding in children with high-risk cancer: a pilot study. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1999; 21(2):111-4.

den Broeder E, Lippens RJ, van’t Hof MA, Tolboom JJ , van Staveren WA , Hofman Z , et al. Effects of naso-gastric tube feeding on the nutritional status of children with cancer. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1998; 52(7): 494-500

Deswarte-Wallace J, Firouzbakhsh S, Finklestein JZ. Using research to change practice: enteral feedings for pediatric oncology patients. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2001; 18(5):217-23.

Pedersen AM, Kok K, Petersen G, Nielsen OH, Michaelsen KF, Schmiegelow K. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children with cancer. Acta Paediatr. 1999; 88(8):849-52.

Sefcick A, Anderton D, Byrne JL, Teahon K, Russell NH. Naso-jejunal feeding in allogeneic bone marrow transplant recipients: results of a pilot study. Bone Marrow Transplantat. 2001; 28(12): 1135-9.

Published

2023-08-29

How to Cite

GARÓFOLO, A., Santos MAIA, P., PETRILLI, A. S., & ANCONA-LOPEZ, F. . (2023). Outcomes of the implementation of an enteral nutrition algorithm in children and adolescents with cancer. Brazilian Journal of Nutrition, 23(5). Retrieved from https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/9407

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLE