Dimensioning of the physical area and required number of food handlers for school food services

Authors

  • Diogo Thimoteo da CUNHA Universidade Estadual de Campinas
  • Ana Laura Benevenuto de AMORIM Universidade Federal de São Paulo
  • Fernanda Helena Marrocos LEITE Universidade Federal de São Paulo
  • Elke STEDEFELDT Universidade Federal de São Paulo
  • Veridiana Vera de ROSSO Universidade Federal de São Paulo
  • Daniel Henrique BANDONI Universidade Federal de São Paulo

Keywords:

Collective feeding, Food handling, School feeding

Abstract

Objective
We aimed to establish equations for dimensioning of the physical area and determining the required number of food handlers in food services of schools and to compare them with reference equations.

Methods
It was visited 44 municipalities located in the states of São Paulo (n=36) and Rio de Janeiro (n=8) between 2013 and 2014. The physical area for school food services was evaluated using a measuring tape. For all food services, we calculated the Maximum Attendance Capacity, which is the sum of small and large meals served during the busiest shift. A validated checklist was used to evaluate food safety practices. Linear regression models were developed to establish the proposed equations.


Results

In total, we evaluated 205 school units. Based on the data, the following equations were established: Equation A: area of production=15.22+(maximum attendance capacity×0.02), which estimates the minimum area needed for a school food service; and Equation B: the number of food handlers=2.17+(maximum attendance capacity×0.002), to determine the minimum number of food handlers needed. These equations were established based on school food services that presented adequate food safety practices (i.e., low health risk).

Conclusion
It was established new equations for calculating the size of the physical area for school food services and the required number of food handlers. These new equations can be used as a starting point in management planning of a school food service.

References

Conselho Federal de Nutricionistas (Brasil). Resolução CFN nº600, de 25 de fevereiro de 2018, texto retificado 23 de maio de 2018. Dispõe sobre a definição das áreas de atuação do nutricionista e suas atribuições, indica parâmetros numéricos mínimos de referência, por área de atuação, para a efetividade dos serviços prestados à sociedade e dá outras providências. Seção 1, p.68, Diário Oficial da União, 2018.

Cunha DT, Rosso VV, Stedefeldt E. Food safety performance and risk of food services from different natures and the role of nutritionist as food safety leader. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2018;23:4033-42.

Abreu ES, Spinelli MGN, Pinto AMS. Gestão de unidades de alimentação e nutrição: um modo de fazer. São Paulo: Metha; 2009.

Teixeira SMFG, Rêgo JC, Figueiredo AJS. Índices para cálculo de área de Unidades de Alimentação e Nutrição (UAN). Alim Nutr. 1992;4:7-20.

Gandra YR, Gambardella AMD. Avaliação de serviços de nutrição e alimentação. São Paulo: Sarvier; 1986.

Sant’Ana HMP, Campos FM. Dimensionamento dos setores da Unidade de Alimentação e Nutrição. In: Sant’Ana HMP, editor. Planejamento físico-funcional de unidades de alimentação e nutrição. Rio de Janeiro: Rubio; 2012. p.85-109.

Ministério da Educação (Brasil). Dados físicos e financeiros do PNAE 2018. 2017 [citado 2017 jul 5]. Disponível em: http://www.fnde.gov.br/programas/pnae/pnae-consultas/pnae-dados-fisicos-e-financeiros-do-pnae

Gomes NAAA, Campos MRH, Monego ET. Aspectos higiênico-sanitários no processo produtivo dos alimentos em escolas públicas do Estado de Goiás, Brasil. Rev Nutr. 2012;25(4):473-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S14 15-52732012000400005

Carvalho NA, Martins KA, Sousa LM. Extra institutional food consumption and food preferences of full-time public school students. Rev Nutr. 2018;31(4):373-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-98652018000400003

Cunha DT, Stedefeldt E, Rosso VV. The use of health risk scores and classification in food service: An experience in Baixada Santista’s public schools, Brazil. Br Food J. 2014;116(5):753-64.

Santana NG, Almeida RCC, Ferreira JS, Almeida PF. Microbiological quality and safety of meals served to children and adoption of good manufacturing practices in public school catering in Brazil. Food Control. 2009;20(3):255-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2008.05.004

Almeida KM, André MCP, Campos MRH, Díaz MEP. Hygienic, sanitary, physical, and functional conditions of Brazilian public school food services. Rev Nutr. 2014;27(3):343-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1415-5 2732014000300008

Ministério da Educação (Brasil). Resolução CD/FNDE nº26, de 17 de junho de 2013. Dispõe sobre o atendimento da alimentação escolar aos alunos da educação básica no âmbito do Programa Nacional de Alimentação Escolar. Brasília: PNAE; 2013.

Stedefeldt E, Cunha DT, Silva Junior EA, Silva SM, Oliveira AB. Instrument for assessment of best practices in school food and nutrition units: From design to validation. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2013;18(4):947-53.

Locatelli NT, Canella DS, Bandoni DH. Factors associated with the consumption of school meals by Brazilian adolescents: Results of the PeNSE survey 2012. Cad Saúde Pública. 2017;33(4):e00183615. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00183615

Carvalho NA, Martins KA, Sousa LM, Díaz MEP. Feeding in full-time public schools: Do students adhere and accept? Rev Nutr. 2017;30(3):357-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-9865201700030000

Ghiselli R, Almanza BA, Ozaki MS. Foodservice design: Trends, space allocation, and factors that influence kitchen size. J Foodservice Sys. 1998;10:89-105.

Goncalves HVB, Cunha DT, Stedefeldt E, Rosso VV. Family farming products on menus in school feeding: A partnership for promoting healthy eating. Ciênc Rural. 2015;45(12):2267-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20150214

Oliveira ABA, Cunha DT, Stedefeldt E, Capalonga R, Tondo EC, Cardoso MRI. Hygiene and good practices in school meal services: Organic matter on surfaces, microorganisms and health risks. Food Control. 2014;40:120-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.11.036

Cunha DT, Fiorotti RM, Baldasso JG, Sousa M, Fontanezi NM, Caivano S, et al. Improvement of food safety in school meal service during a long-term intervention period: A strategy based on the knowledge, attitude and practice triad. Food Control. 2013;34(2):662-7. http:dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont. 2013.06.003

Cunha DT, Rosso VV, Stedefeldt E. Should weights and risk categories be used for inspection scores to evaluate food safety in restaurants? J Food Prot. 2016;79(3):501-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-292

Buchholz U, Run G, Kool JL, Fielding J, Mascola L. A risk-based restaurant inspection system in Los Angeles County. J Food Prot. 2002;65(2):367-72.

Senado Federal (Brasil). Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988. Brasília: Senado Federal; 1988.

Modesto P. Notas para um debate sobre o princípio da eficiência. Rev Serv Público. 2000;51(2):105-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.21874/rsp.v51i2.328

Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Resolução RDC nº216, de 15 de setembro de 2004. Dispõe sobre regulamento técnico de boas práticas para serviços de alimentação. Seção 1, p.25, Diário Oficial da União, 2004.

Todd ECD, Greig JD, Bartleson CA, Michaels BS. Outbreaks where food workers have been implicated in the spread of foodborne disease, Part 3: Factors contributing to outbreaks and description of outbreak categories. J Food Prot. 2007;70(9):2199-217.

Proença RPC. Novas tecnologias para a produção de refeições coletivas: recomendações de introdução para a realidade brasileira. Rev Nutr. 1999;12(1):43-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1415-52731999000100004

Published

2023-03-06

How to Cite

da CUNHA, D. T. ., Benevenuto de AMORIM, A. L. ., Marrocos LEITE, F. H. ., STEDEFELDT, E. ., de ROSSO, V. V. ., & BANDONI, D. H. . (2023). Dimensioning of the physical area and required number of food handlers for school food services. Brazilian Journal of Nutrition, 32. Retrieved from https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/7565

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLE