Tarefa para Casa: sim ou não? Uma perspectiva autorregulatória da aprendizagem | Homework: Yes or no? A self-regulated learning perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24220/2318-0870v23n3a4105Palabras clave:
Autorregulação da aprendizagem. Rendimento escolar. Tarefa para casa.Resumen
A Tarefa para Casa é o conjunto de tarefas marcadas pelos professores aos alunos para serem realizadas fora do horário escolar. O debate “sim ou não à Tarefa para Casa” parece interminável. Tanto nas escolas como na mídia, professores, alunos, pais e administradores escolares apresentam argumentos favoráveis e contrários a essa prática, no entanto nem sempre baseados em dados de investigação. A seleção dos artigos mencionados neste trabalho foi efetuada de acordo com cada uma das três fases da Tarefa para Casa: preparação, realização e monitorização. Com apoio em estudos conduzidos nos últimos anos, este artigo pretende despertar a reflexão sobre o tema. Dado que o professor é o responsável pela gestão da Tarefa para Casa, considera-se que ele possa ser um agente de mudança nas atitudes frente a essa prática e, sobretudo, na sua utilização. Assim, o presente artigo dá especial ênfase ao papel que o professor pode assumir naqueles três momentos que compõem o processo da Tarefa para Casa, numa perspectiva autorregulatória da aprendizagem. Pretende-se, assim, com suporte na investigação, promover uma reflexão profunda sobre a Tarefa para Casa e sua utilização, com vistas a trazer importantes benefícios para os alunos. A resposta “sim ou não à Tarefa para Casa?” dependerá dessa utilização.
Descargas
Citas
An, S.; Wu, Z. Enhancing mathematics teachers’ knowledge of students’ thinking from assessing and analyzing misconceptions in homework. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, v.10, n.3, p.717-753, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10763-011-9324-x
Bembenutty, H. Meaningful and maladaptive homework practices: The role of self-efficacy and self-regulation. Journal of Advanced Academics, v.22, n.3, p.448-473, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1932202X1102200304
Bempechat, J. The motivational benefits of homework: A social-cognitive perspective. Theory Into Practice, v.43, n.3, p.189-196, 2004.
Boud, D.; Molloy, E. Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, v.38, n.6, p.698-712, 2013. http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
Bräu, K.; Harring, M.; Weyl, C. Homework practices: Role conflicts concerning parental involvement. Ethnography and Education, v.12, n.1, p.64-77, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2016.1147970
Brookhart, S.M. How to give effective feedback to your students. Alexandria: ASCD, 2008.
Buijs, M.; Admiraal, W. Homework assignments to enhance student engagement in secondary education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, v.28, n.3, p.767-779, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10212-012-0139-0
Butler, D.L.; Winne, P.H. Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, v.65, n.3, p.245-281, 1995.
Cooper, H. Synthesis of research on homework. Educational Leadership, v.47, n.3, p.85-91, 1989.
Cooper, H. The battle over homework: Common ground for administrators, teachers, and parents. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2001.
Cooper, H.; Robinson, J.; Patall, E. Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research. Review of Educational Research, v.76, n.1, p.1-62, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543076001001
Corno, L. Looking at homework differently. The Elementary School Journal, v.100, n.5, p.529-548, 2000.
Corno, L.; XU, J. Homework as the job of childhood. Theory Into Practice, v.43, n.3, p.227-233, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4303_9
Coulson, J. Why kids aged under 14 don’t need homework. Brisbane: The Courier Mails, 2015. Available from: <http://www.couriermail.com.au/lifestyle/parenting/kidspotmoments/why-kids-aged-under-14-dont-need-homework/news-story/4da547af986a20d52baea39c76de36c3>. Cited: Sept. 24, 2015.
Creasy, M. Unhomework: How to get the most out of homework, without really setting it. Carmarthen: Independent Thinking Press, 2014.
Cunha, J. Monitorização do TPC de matemática: mapeando e avaliando práticas de professores, alunos e pais. 2018. 231 f. Tese (Doutoramento em Psicologia Aplicada) – Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal, 2018.
Cunha, J. et al. Parents’ conceptions about their homework involvement in elementary school. Psicothema, v.27, n.2, p.159-165, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2014.210
Cunha, J. et al. “Homework feedback is...”: Teachers’ conceptions of homework feedback. Frontiers in Psychology, v.9, p.1-20, 2018a. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00032
Cunha, J. et al. A study of the validity and reliability of the parental homework management scale. Psicothema, v.30, n.3, p.337-343, 2018b. http://dx.doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2017.426
Danielson, M.; Strom, B.; Kramer, K. Real homework tasks: A pilot study of types, values, and resource requirements. Educational Research Quarterly, v.35, n.1, p.17-32, 2011.
Deslandes, R.; Rousseau, M. Long-term students’ management strategies and parental involvement in homework at the elementary level. International Journal of Parents in Education, v.2, n.1, p.13-24, 2008. Available from: <http://www.ernape. net/ejournal/index.php/IJPE/article/viewFile/68/53>. Cited: Sept. 24, 2015.
Dumont, H. et al. Does parental homework involvement mediate the relationship between family background and educational outcomes? Contemporary Educational Psychology, v.37, n.1, p.55-69, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.09.004
Dumont, H. et al. Quality of parental homework involvement: Predictors and reciprocal relations with academic functioning in the reading domain. Journal of Educational Psychology, v.106, n.1, p.144-161, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0034100
Elawar, M.C.; Corno, L. A factorial experiment in teachers’ written feedback on student homework: Changing teacher behavior a little rather than a lot. Journal of Educational Psychology, v.77, n.2, p. 162-173, 1985.
Epstein, J.L.; Van Voorhis, F.L. More than ten minutes: Teachers’ roles in designing homework. Educational Psychologist, v.36, n.3, p.181-193, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3603_4
Epstein, J.L.; Van Voorhis, F. The changing debate: From assigning homework to designing homework. In: Suggate, S.; Reese, E. (Ed.). Contemporary debates in child development and education. London: Routledge, 2012. p.263-273.
Fan, H. et al. Homework and students’ achievement in math and science: A 30-year meta-analysis, 1986-2015. Educational Research Review, v.20, p.35-54, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.003
Fernández-Alonso, R.; Suárez-Álvarez, J.; Muñiz, J. Adolescents’ homework performance in mathematics and science: Personal factors and teaching practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, v.107, n.4, p.1075-1085, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/edu0000032
Flunger, B. et al. The Janus-faced nature of time spent on homework: Using latent profile analyses to predict academic achievement over a school year. Learning and Instruction, v.39, p.97-106, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.05.008
Foyle, H. et al. Homework and cooperative learning: A classroom field experiment. Emporia: Emporia State University, 1990.
Fulano, C. et al. Mozambican adolescents’ perspectives of academic procrastination. School Psychology International, v.39, n.2, p.196-213, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0143034318760115
Hattie, J. Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 metaanalyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge, 2009.
Hoover-Dempsey, K.V. et al. Parental involvement in homework. Educational Psychologist, v.36, n.3, p.195-209, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3603_5
Katz, I.; Kaplan, A.; Gueta, G. Students’ needs, teachers’ support, and motivation for doing homework: A cross-sectional study. The Journal of Experimental Education, v.78, n.2, p.246-267, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220970903292868
Kaur, B. Mathematics homework: A study of three grade eight classrooms in Singapore. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, v.9, n.1, p.187-206, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9237-0
Keith, T.Z. Time spent on homework and high school grades: A large-sample path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, v.74, n.2, p.248-253, 1982.
Kukliansky, I.; Shosberger, I.; Eshach, H. Science teachers’ voice on homework: Beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, v.14, p.229-250, 2016. Supplement 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9555-8
Minotti, J. Effects of learning-style-based homework prescriptions on the achievement and attitudes of middle school students. NASSP Bulletin, v.89, n.642, p.67-89, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019263650508964206
Moroni, S. et al. The need to distinguish between quantity and quality in research on parental involvement: The example of parental help with homework. The Journal of Educational Research, v.108, n.5, p.417-431, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.901283
Mourão, R. Etapas processuais do trabalho de casa e efeitos auto-regulatórios na aprendizagem do Inglês: um estudo com diários de TPC no 2º ciclo do ensino básico. 2009. 248 f. Tese (Doutoramento em Educação) – Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal, 2009.
Muhlenbruck, L. et al. Homework and achievement: Explaining the different strengths of relation at the elementary and secondary school levels. Social Psychology of Education, v.3, n.4, p.295-317, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009680513901
Nakai, Y.; O’Malley, A.L. Feedback to know, to show, or both? A profile approach to the feedback process. Learning and Individual Differences, v.43, p.1-10, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.028
Nunes, A.R. Did you do your homework? Teachers’ perspectives of homework follow-up practices. 2015. 35 f. Thesis (Master Orkin, M.; May, S.; Wolf, M. How parental support during homework contributes to helpless behaviors among struggling readers. Reading Psychology, v.38, n.5, p.506-541, 2017.
Patall, E.A.; Cooper, H.; Robinson, J.C. Parent involvement in homework: A research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, v.78, n.4, p.1039-1101, 2008.
Patall, E.A.; Cooper, H.; Wynn, S.R. The effectiveness and relative importance of choice in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, v.102, n.4, p.896-915, 2010.
Pijls, M.; Dekker, R. Students discussing their mathematical ideas: The role of the teacher. Mathematics Education Research Journal, v.23, n.4, p.379-396, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13394-011-0022-3
Pomerantz, E.M.; Moorman, E.A.; Litwack, S.D. The how, whom, and why of parents’ involvement in children’s academic lives: More is not always better. Review of Educational Research, v.77, n.3, p.373-410, 2007.
Ramdass, D.; Zimmerman, B.J. Developing self-regulation skills: The important role of homework. Journal of Advanced Academics, v.22, n.2, p.194-218, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1932202X1102200202
Reeve, J. A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In: Christenson, S.L.; Reschly, A.L.; Wylie, C. (Ed.). Handbook of research on student engagement. New York: Springer, 2012. p.149-172.
Ribeiro, L. Teacher feedback and writing quality: Identifying distinct profiles of struggling writers. 2016. 35 f. Thesis (Master in Psychology) – Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal, 2016.
Rosário, P. Estudar o estudar: (des)venturas do Testas. Porto: Porto Editora, 2004.
Rosário, P. et al. Trabalho de casa, tarefas escolares, auto-regulação e envolvimento parental. Psicologia em Estudo, v.10, n.3, p.343-351, 2005.
Rosário, P. et al. Homework, self-efficacy and math achievement. Psicologia Escolar e Educacional, v.12, n.1, p.23-35, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-85572008000100003
Rosário, P. et al. Tareas para casa, autorregulación del aprendizaje y rendimiento en matemáticas. Revista de Psicodidáctica, v.14, n.2, p.179-192, 2009.
Rosário, P. et al. Uso de diarios de tareas para casa en el inglês como lengua extranjera: evaluación de pros y contras en el aprendizaje autorregulado y rendimiento. Psicothema, v.23,
n.4, p.681-687, 2011.
Rosário, P. et al. Does homework design matter? The role of homework’s purpose in student mathematics achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, v.43, p.10-24, 2015a. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.08.001
Rosário, P. et al. The effects of teachers’ homework follow-up practices on students’ EFL performance: A randomized-group in Psychology) – Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal, 2015.
Nunes, T. O papel dos professores na preparação do TPC e o impacto na performance escolar dos alunos a matemática. 2016. 145 f. Tese (Doutoramento em Psicologia Aplicada) – Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal, 2016.
Nunes, T. et al. O papel do professor: enfoque nas características de um TPC de qualidade. Revista de Psicología y Educación, v.9, n.2, p.57-70, 2014.
Núñez, J.C. et al. Homework and academic achievement across Spanish compulsory education. Educational Psychology, v.35, n.6, p.726-746, 2015a. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.817537
Núñez, J.C. et al. Relationships between perceived parental involvement in homework, student homework behaviors, and academic achievement: Differences among elementary, junior high, and high school students. Metacognition and Learning, v.10, n.3, p.375-406, 2015b. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11409-015-9135-5
O’Melia, M.C.; Rosenberg, M.S. Effects of cooperative homework teams on the acquisition of mathematics skills by secondary students with mild disabilities. Exceptional Children, v.60, n.6, p.538-548, 1994.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. PISA 2012 Results in focus: Does homework perpetuate inequities in education? Paris: OECD Publishing, 2014.
Orkin, M.; May, S.; Wolf, M. How parental support during homework contributes to helpless behaviors among struggling readers. Reading Psychology, v.38, n.5, p.506-541,
Patall, E.A.; Cooper, H.; Robinson, J.C. Parent involvement in homework: A research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, v.78, n.4, p.1039-1101, 2008.
Patall, E.A.; Cooper, H.; Wynn, S.R. The effectiveness and relative importance of choice in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, v.102, n.4, p.896-915, 2010.
Pijls, M.; Dekker, R. Students discussing their mathematical ideas: The role of the teacher. Mathematics Education Research Journal, v.23, n.4, p.379-396, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s13394-011-0022-3
Pomerantz, E.M.; Moorman, E.A.; Litwack, S.D. The how, whom, and why of parents’ involvement in children’s academic lives: More is not always better. Review of Educational Research, v.77, n.3, p.373-410, 2007.
Ramdass, D.; Zimmerman, B.J. Developing self-regulation skills: The important role of homework. Journal of Advanced Academics, v.22, n.2, p.194-218, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1932202X1102200202
Reeve, J. A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In: Christenson, S.L.; Reschly, A.L.; Wylie, C. (Ed.). Handbook of research on student engagement. New York: Springer, 2012. p.149-172.
Ribeiro, L. Teacher feedback and writing quality: Identifying distinct profiles of struggling writers. 2016. 35 f. Thesis (Master in Psychology) – Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal, 2016.
Rosário, P. Estudar o estudar: (des)venturas do Testas. Porto: Porto Editora, 2004.
Rosário, P. et al. Trabalho de casa, tarefas escolares, auto-regulação e envolvimento parental. Psicologia em Estudo, v.10, n.3, p.343-351, 2005.
Rosário, P. et al. Homework, self-efficacy and math achievement. Psicologia Escolar e Educacional, v.12, n.1, p.23-35, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-85572008000100003
Rosário, P. et al. Tareas para casa, autorregulación del aprendizaje y rendimiento en matemáticas. Revista de Psicodidáctica, v.14, n.2, p.179-192, 2009.
Rosário, P. et al. Uso de diarios de tareas para casa en el inglês como lengua extranjera: evaluación de pros y contras en el aprendizaje autorregulado y rendimiento. Psicothema, v.23, n.4, p.681-687, 2011.
Rosário, P. et al. Does homework design matter? The role of homework’s purpose in student mathematics achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, v.43, p.10-24, 2015a. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.08.001
Rosário, P. et al. The effects of teachers’ homework follow-up practices on students’ EFL performance: A randomized-group design. Frontiers in Psychology, v.6, n.1528, p.1-11, 2015b. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01528
Rosário, P. et al. Transcultural analysis of the effectiveness of a program to promote self-regulated learning in Mozambique, Chile, Portugal, and Spain. Higher Education Research and Development, v.34, n.1, p.173-187, 2015c. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.935932
Rosário, P. et al. Analysis of instructional programs for improving self-regulated learning SRL through written text. In: Fidalgo, R.; Harris, K.; Braaksma, M. (Ed.). Design principles for teaching effective writing. Leiden: Brill Editions, 2017.
Rosário, P. et al. Homework purposes, homework behaviors, and academic achievement: Examining the mediating role of students’ perceived homework quality. Contemporary Educational Psychology, v.53, p.168-180, 2018.
Ryan, R.M.; Deci, E.L. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, v.25, n.1, p.54-67, 2000. http://dx. doi.org/10.1006/ ceps.1999.1020
Ryan, R.M.; Deci, E.L. Self-Regulation and the problem of human autonomy: Does psychology need choice, selfdetermination, and will? Journal of Personality, v.74, n.6, p.1557-1586, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00420.x
Schlindwein, L.M.; Bueno, S.I. O professor e a prática dos deveres de casa: planejamento e ação em questão. Atos de Pesquisa em Educação, v.8, n.2, p.701-715, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.7867/1809-0354.2013v8n2p701-715
Schmitz, B.; Perels, F. Self-monitoring of self-regulation during math homework behaviour using standardized diaries. Metacognition and Learning, v.6, n.3, p.255-273, 2011.
Shunk, D.H.; Zimmerman, B.J. Social origins of self-regulatory competence. Educational Psychologist, v.32, n.4, p.195-208, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3204_1
Silinskas, G.; Kikas, E. Parental involvement in math homework: Links to children’s performance and motivation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, p.1-21, 2017. http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/00313831.2017.1324901
Spruce, R.; Bol, L. Teacher beliefs, knowledge, and practice of self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, v.10, n.2, p.245-277, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11409-014-9124-0
Toothman, B.; Shackelford, R. The effects of partiallyindividualized assignments on subsequent student performance. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.30, n.1, p.287-291, 1998.
Trautwein, U. The homework-achievement relation reconsidered: Differentiating homework time, homework frequency, and homework effort. Learning and Instruction, v.17, n.3, p.372-388, 2007.
Trautwein, U. et al. Do homework assignments enhance achievement? A multilevel analysis in 7th-grade mathematics. Contemporary Educational Psychology, v.27, n.1, p.26-50, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2001.1084
Trautwein, U. et al. Predicting homework effort: Support for a domain-specific, multilevel homework model. Journal of Educational Psychology, v.98, n.2, p.438-456, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.438
Trautwein, U. et al. Between-teacher differences in homework assignments and the development of students’ homework effort, homework emotions, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, v.101, n.1, p.176-189, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.101.1.176
Trautwein, U.; Köller, O. The relationship between homework and achievement: Still much of a mystery. Educational Psychology Review, v.15, n.2, p.115-145, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1023460414243
Trautwein, U.; Lüdtke, O. Predicting homework motivation and homework effort in six school subjects: The role of person and family characteristics, classroom factors, and school track. Learning and Instruction, v.19, n.3, p.243-258, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.05.001
Van Voorhis, F.L. Costs and benefits of family involvement in homework. Journal of Advanced Academics, v.22, n.2, p.220-249, 2011.
Vatterott, C. Rethinking homework: Best practices that support diverse needs. Alexandria: ASCD, 2009.
Walberg, H.J.; Paik, S.J. Effective educational practices. Geneva: International Bureau of Education, 2000. p.9. (Educational practices series, v.3). Available from: <http://www.ibe.unesco.org/fileadmin/user_upload/archive/Publications/educationalpracticesseriespdf/prac03e.pdf>. Cited: Mar. 5, 2012.
Weiner, B. Principles for a theory of student motivation and their application within an attributional framework. In: Ames, R.; Ames, C. (Ed.). Student motivation. San Diego: Academic Press, 1984. (Research on motivation, v.1).
Wildman, P.R. Homework pressures. Peabody Journal of Education, v.45, n.4, p.202-204, 1968. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01619566809537528
Xu, J. Models of secondary school students’ interest in homework: A multilevel analysis. American Educational Research Journal, v.45, n.4, p.1180-1205, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0002831208323276
Xu, J. Predicting homework time management at the secondary school level: A multilevel analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, v.20, n.1, p.34-39, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.11.001
Xu, J. Homework completion at the secondary school level: A Multilevel analysis. The Journal of Educational Research, v.104, n.3, p.171-182, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220671003636752
Xu, J. A study of the validity and reliability of the teacher homework involvement scale: A psychometric evaluation. Measurement, v.93, p.102-107, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.10 16/j.measurement.2016.07.012
Xu, J.; Corno, L. Case studies of families doing third-grade homework. Teachers College Record, v.100, n.2, p.402-438, 1998.
Xu, J.; Du, J.; Fan, X. Self-regulation of mathematics homework behavior: An empirical investigation. The Journal of Educational Research, v.110, n.5, p.467-477, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2015.1125837
Xu, J. et al. A study of the validity and reliability of the parental homework support scale. Measurement, v.95, p.93-98, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.09.045
Xu, J.; Wu, H. Self-regulation of homework behavior: Homework management at the secondary school level. The Journal of Educational Research, v.106, n.1, p.1-13, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2012.658457
Xu, J.; Yuan, R. Doing homework: Listening to students,’ parents,’ and teachers’ voices in one urban middle school community. School Community Journal, v.13, n.2, p.25-44, 2003.
Zhu, Y.; Leung, F. Homework and mathematics achievement in Hong Kong: Evidence from the TIMSS 2003. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, v.10, n.4, p.907-925, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10763-011-9302-3
Zimmerman, B.J. Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, v.41, n.2, p.64-70, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Zimmerman, B.J.; Kitsantas, A. Homework practices and academic achievement: The mediating role of selfefficacy and perceived responsibility beliefs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, v.30, n.4, p.397-417, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.05.003
Zimmerman, B.J.; Martinez-Pons, M. Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, v.82, n.1, p.51-59, 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.51
