O método arqueológico no pensamento contemporâneo

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24220/2447-6803v43n2a4271

Palavras-chave:

Arqueologia. Edward Said. Giorgio Agamben. Michel Foucault. Origem. Sigmund Freud.

Resumo

Inspirando-se principalmente nos filósofos contemporâneos Michel Foucault e Giorgio Agamben, este ensaio sugere que, para se pensar o conceito de origem ou uma arché, deve-se primeiramente partir de uma “arqueologia” que toma como ponto de partida a “origem” do falso sagrado. Em outras palavras, a tarefa arqueológica imprescindível deve ser redefinida através da identificação de suas formas falseadas (ideológicas), a fim de compreendermos melhor tanto os métodos da arqueologia (como uma regressão, mas não a um ponto histórico de origem) quanto as apostas políticas da arqueologia. Isso significa levar a sério as complexidades das fontes e tradições que informam o que as pessoas consideram ser uma narrativa sacralizada assim como os meios de transmissão que as influenciam.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Colby Dickinson, Loyola University Chicago

Loyola University Chicago, Theology Course, Department of Theology. Crown Center 313, 1032, West Sheridan Road, IL 60660, Chicago, USA.

Referências

ADORNO, T.W. Resignation, critical models: Interventions and Catchwords. New York: Columbia University Press, 1998.

AGAMBEN, G. Philosophical Archaeology, the signature of all things: On Method. New York: Zone, 2009. p.89-107.

AGAMBEN, G. The use of bodies. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2016. p.273-278.

ANDERSON, B. Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso, 1983.

CLAUSSEN, D. Theodor W. Adorno: One last genius. Cambridge: Belknap Press, 2008.

DERRIDA, J. On the name. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1995.

DERRIDA, J. Archive Fever: A Freudian impression. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.

DICKINSON, C.; KOTSKO, A. Agamben’s coming philosophy: Finding a new use for theology. London: Rowman and Littlefield, 2015.

FOUCAULT, M. Cogito and the history of madness. In: DERRIDA, J. Writing and difference. London: Routledge, 1978. p.31-63.

FOUCAULT, M. Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In: FOUCAULT, M. The Foucault Reader. New York: Pantheon, 1984. p.76-100.

FOUCAULT, M. Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings: 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon, 1980. p.83.

FOUCAULT, M. The archaeology of knowledge. London: Routledge, 1989. p.83-196.

FOUCAULT, M. Abnormal: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1974-1975. New York: Picador, 2003.

FOUCAULT, M. The Hermeneutics of the Subject: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1981-1982. New York: Picador, 2005. p.11.

FOUCAULT, M. Lectures on the will to know: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1970-1971, and oedipal knowledge. London: Palgrave-MacMillan, 2013. p.202-208.

FOUCAULT, M. On the government of the living: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1979-1980. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. p.78-79.

GIRARD, R. Things hidden since the foundation of the world. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987. p.437-438.

GUTTING, G. Michel Foucault’s archaeology of scientific reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989. p.272-287.

HAN, B. Foucault’s critical project: Between the transcendental and the historical. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002.

HODDER, I. Sustainable time travel: Toward a global politics of the past. In: Kane, S. (Ed.). The politics of archaeology in a global context. Boston: Archaeological Institute of America, 2003. p.139-147.

INSOLL, T. Archaeology, ritual, religion. London: Routledge, 2004.

JENNINGS, M. The Will to Apokatastasis: Media, experience, and eschatology in Walter Benjamin’s late theological politics. In: DICKINSON, C.; SYMONS, S. (Ed.). Walter Benjamin and Theology. New York: Fordham University Press, 2016. p.93-109.

KOHL, P.; FAWCETT, C. (Ed.). Nationalism, politics, and the practice of archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.

KOOPMAN, C. Genealogy as critique: Foucault and the problems of modernity. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2013.

LATOUR, B. We have never been modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993.

MAHON, M. Foucault’s Nietzschean genealogy: Truth, power, and the subject. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992. p.179.

MALINA, J.M.; VAŠÍČEK, Z. Archaeology yesterday and today: The development of archaeology in the sciences and humanities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. p.263.

McNIVEN, I.J.; RUSSELL, L. Appropriated pasts: Indigenous peoples and the colonial culture of Archaeology. New York: AltaMira Press, 2005.

MESKELL, L. (Ed.). Archaeology under fire: Nationalism, politics and heritage in the eastern Mediterranean and middle east. London: Routledge, 1998.

RICOEUR, P. Freud and philosophy: An essay on interpretation. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1970. p.446-459.

RUHL, S. 100 essays I don’t have time to write: On umbrellas and sword fights, parades and dogs, fire alarms, children, and theater. New York: Faber and Faber, 2014. p.197-198.

SACHS, N. O the Chimneys: Selected poems, including the verse play. New York: FSG, 1967. p.232-233.

SAID, E. Freud and the Non-European. London: Verso, 2003. p.44-54.

SMITH, L. Archaeological theory and the politics of cultural heritage. London: Routledge, 2004.

SMITH, L. Uses of heritage. London: Routledge, 2006.

TRIGGER, B.G. A history of archaeological thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

Downloads

Publicado

2019-05-10

Como Citar

Dickinson, C. (2019). O método arqueológico no pensamento contemporâneo. Reflexão, 43(2), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.24220/2447-6803v43n2a4271