City and complexity
Reflections on the practice of contemporary design
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24220/2318-0919v15e2018a3422Keywords:
City, Collectives, Complexity, DesignAbstract
This article approaches and discusses the concept of complexity using the analysis of examples of urban intervention projects from Spanish multidisciplinary groups. The paper analyses the design process of this renewed set of urban design initiatives and its flexible and articulated architectural posture. It brings innumerable contributions to rethink fundamental questions of contemporary design practice. We will explain and discuss concepts, tactics, principles of design, and other aspects that contribute to re-thinking the complexity of the current urban problems.
Downloads
References
AWAN, N. et al. Spatial agency: Other ways of doing architecture. New York: Routledge, 2011.
BASURAMA. Formatos híbridos: creadores latinoamericanos. In: BASURAMA (Ed.). RUS: Residuos urbanos sólidos. Basura y espacio público en Latinoamérica. Madrid: Delírio, 2011. p.184-187.
BASURAMA. RUS: Proyecto residuos urbanos sólidos. Arquitectura Viva, n.145, p.62-65, 2012. (Colectivos Españoles).
CERTEAU, M. A invenção do cotidiano: artes de fazer. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2011. p.169.
CHASE, J. et al. Everyday urbanism. New York: Monacelli Press, 1999.
COSTA, C.Z. Além das formas: introdução ao pensamento contemporâneo no design, nas artes e na arquitetura. São Paulo: Annablume, 2010.
DOUCET, I.; CUPERS, K. Agency in architecture: Reframing criticality in theory and practice. Footprint: Delft School of Design Journal, n.4, p.1-6, 2009.
EL CAMPO DE CEBADA. Gestión vecinal de la plaza de la Cebada, Madrid. Arquitectura Viva, n.45, p.52-55, 2012.
FISCHER, G.; GIACCARDI, E. Meta-design: A framework for the future of end-user development. In: LIEBERMAN, H.; PATERNÒ, F.; WULF, V. (Ed.). End user development: empowering people to flexibly employ advanced information and communication technology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 2004. p. 427-447.
HARVEY, D. A condição pós-moderna: uma pesquisa sobre as origens da mudança cultural. São Paulo: Loyola, 2006.
JENCKS, C.; SILVER, N. Adhocism: The case for improvisation. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2013.
LASH, S. et al. Agency and architecture: How to be critical? Footprint: Delft Architecture Theory Journal, n.4, p.7-19, 2009.
MAZÓN, P.R. Basurama: A framework for designing collectively with waste. 2003. Available from: <http://basurama.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/130325_Pablo-Rey-Mazon_Basurama-a-framework-for-designing-collectively-with-waste_p.pdf>. Cited: Dec. 19, 2017.
MORIN, E. Introdução ao pensamento complexo. Porto Alegre: Sulina, 2011.
ROCHA, B. Complexidade e improvisação em arquitetura. 2015. 256 f. Tese (Doutorado em Arquitetura e Urbanismo) — Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2015.
SANOFF, H. Special issue on participatory design. Design Studies, v.28, n.3, p.213-215, 217
SCHUMACHER, P. The autopoiesis of architecture: A new agenda for architecture. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 2012. v.2.
TRIPP, D. Pesquisa-ação: uma introdução metodológica. Revista Educação e Pesquisa, v.31, n.3, p.443-466, 2005.
VENTURI, R. Complexidade e contradição em arquitetura. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2004.
