Julgamentos distributivos em contextos cooperativos de produção

Autores

Palavras-chave:

Cooperação, Tomada de decisão, Justiça distributiva, Propriedade

Resumo

O presente estudo teve como objetivo investigar julgamentos distributivos em situações hipotéticas envolvendo atividades produtivas. Os participantes deveriam dividir os bolinhos produzidos entre dois personagens, um dos quais identificado como o próprio participante. Foram analisados três fatores: (1) modo de produção: cooperativo com ajuda de uma pessoa ou sozinho, usando os meios de produção de outro; (2) finalidade da produção: venda ou piquenique; e (3) perspectiva do participante: dar os bolinhos para o outro ou pegar para si. Também foram medidas a facilidade e a confiança em cada julgamento. A amostra foi composta de 156 estudantes universitários. Os resultados indicaram que os três fatores influenciaram o julgamento distributivo dos participantes, sendo o modo de produção o mais relevante. Esses resultados foram discutidos à luz de pesquisas recentes sobre o comportamento cooperativo e os mecanismos cognitivos que influenciam o processo de tomada de decisão em questões envolvendo a justiça distributiva.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Baumard, N., Boyer, P., & Sperber, D. (2010). Evolution of fairness: Cultural variability. Science, 23(329),388-389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.329.5990.389-a

Blake, P. R., McAuliffe, K., & Warneken, F. (2014). The developmental origins of fairness: The knowledgebehavior gap. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(11), 559-561. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.08.003

Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2008). What’s in a name? Anonymity and social distance in dictator and ultimatum games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 68(1), 29-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2008.03.001

Eckel, C., & Grossman, P. (1996). Altruism in anonymous dictator games. Games and Economic Behavior, 16(2), 181-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/game.1996.0081

Engel, C. (2011). Dictator games: A meta study. Experimental Economics, 14(4), 583-610. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10683-011-9283-

Evans, A. M., Dillon, K. D., & Rand, D. G. (2015). Fast but not intuitive, slow but not reflective: Decision conflict drives reaction times in social dilemmas. Journal of. Experimental Psychology: General, 144(5), 951. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000107

Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817-868. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/003355399556151

Grossman, P. J., & Eckel, C. C. (2015). Giving versus taking for a cause. Economics Letters, 132, 28-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2015.04.002

Haar, J., & Spell, C. (2009). How does distributive justice affect work attitudes? The moderating effects of autonomy. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(8), 1827-1842. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585190903087248

Hamann, K., Warneken, F., Greenberg, J., & Tomasello, M. (2011). Collaboration encourages equal sharing in children but not chimpanzees. Nature, 476, 328-331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature10278

Kanngiesser, P., & Hood, B. M. (2014). Young children’s understanding of ownership rights for newly made objects. Cognitive Development, 29, 30-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2013.09.003

Kanngiesser, P., Gjersoe, N. L., & Hood, B. M. (2010). The effect of creative labor on propertyownership transfer by preschool children and adults. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1236-1241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797610380701

Konow, J. (1996). A positive theory of economic fairness. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 31(1), 13-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(96)00862-1

Konow, J. (2001). Fair and square: The four sides of distributive justice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 46(2), 137-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00194-9

Korenok, O., Millner, E. L., & Razzolini, L. (2014). Taking, giving, and impure altruism in dictator games. Experimental Economics, 17(3), 488-500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10683-013-9379-3

Moll, H., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Co-operation and human cognition: The Vygotskian intelligence hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 362(1480), 639-648. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.2000

Neary, K. R., Van de Vondervoort, J. W., & Friedman, O. (2012). Artifacts and natural kinds: Children’s judgments about whether objects are owned. Developmental Psychology, 48(1), 149-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0025661

Nishi, A., Christakis, N. A., Evans, A. M., O’Malley, A. J., & Rand, D. G. (2016). Social environment shapes the speed of cooperation. Scientific Reports, 6, 29622. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep29622

Oxoby, R. J., & Spraggon, J. M. (2008). Mine and yours: Property rights in dictator games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 65(3-4), 703-713. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2005.12.006

Pierce, J., & Jussila, I. (2010). Collective psychological ownership within the work and organizational context: Construct introduction and elaboration. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(6), 810-834. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.628

Pierce, J., O’Driscoll, M., & Coghlan, A. (2004). Work environment structure and psychological ownership: The mediating effects of control. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144(5), 507-534. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.144.5.507-534

Rand, D. G., Greene, J. D., & Nowak, M. A. (2012). Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature, 489(7416), 427 430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11467

Sampaio, L. R., & Cabral, G. R. E. (2015). Differences in allocation patterns and in the use of distributive principles emerge from children of brazilian parents in Brazil and in the United States. Suma Psicológica, 22(1), 19-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sumpsi.2015.05.003

Sampaio, L. R., Camino, C. P. S., & Roazzi, A. (2009). Justiça distributiva: uma revisão da literatura psicossocial e desenvolvimentista. Psicologia em Estudo (Maringá), 14(4), 631-640. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-73722009000400003

Shye, S. (2014). Faceted Action System Theory (FAST). In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research (pp.2119-2125). Dordrecht: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_3616

Skarzynska, K. (1989). Evaluative perspective and distributive justice. In N. Eisenberg, J. Roykowsky, & E. Staub (Orgs.), Social and moral values: Individual and societal perspectives (pp.139-152). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum

Tomasello, M., & Vaish, A. (2013). Origins of human cooperation and morality. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 231-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143812

Tomasello, M., & Warneken, F. (2008). Share and share alike. Nature, 454, 1057-1058. http:/dx.doi.org/10.1038/4541057a

Vogelsang, M., & Tomasello, M. (2016). Giving is nicer than taking: Preschoolers reciprocate based onthe social intentions of the distributor. PloS One, 11(1), e0147539. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147539

Warneken, F., Lohse, K., Melis, A., & Tomasello, M. (2011). Young children share the spoils after collaboration. Psychological Science, 22(2), 267-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797610395392

Downloads

Publicado

2023-02-16

Como Citar

CABRAL, G. R. E., SAMPAIO, L. R., & ROAZZI, A. (2023). Julgamentos distributivos em contextos cooperativos de produção. Estudos De Psicologia, 35(2). Recuperado de https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/estpsi/article/view/7451

Edição

Seção

PSICOLOGIA SOCIAL E ORGANIZACIONAL