Distributive judgments in cooperative production contexts

Autores/as

Palabras clave:

Cooperation, Decision making, Distributive justice, Ownership

Resumen

The objective of the present study was to investigate distributive judgments in hypothetical situations involving productive activities. The participants should divide produced cupcakes between two story characters. One of the characters was the participant him/herself. Three factors were analyzed: (1) mode of production: cooperative with the help of one person or alone using someone else’s means of production; (2) purpose of production: sale or picnic; and (3) participants’ perspective: give the cupcakes to or take from the other character. Their confi dence on each judgment and how easily they madetheir judgments were other aspects analyzed. The sample consisted of 156 university students. The results showed thatthe three factors infl uenced the participants’ distributive judgment, and mode of production had the most signifi cant infl uence. These results were discussed based on recent research on cooperative behavior and cognitive mechanisms that affect the decision-making process in situations involving distributive justice

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Baumard, N., Boyer, P., & Sperber, D. (2010). Evolution of fairness: Cultural variability. Science, 23(329),388-389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.329.5990.389-a

Blake, P. R., McAuliffe, K., & Warneken, F. (2014). The developmental origins of fairness: The knowledgebehavior gap. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(11), 559-561. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.08.003

Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2008). What’s in a name? Anonymity and social distance in dictator and ultimatum games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 68(1), 29-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2008.03.001

Eckel, C., & Grossman, P. (1996). Altruism in anonymous dictator games. Games and Economic Behavior, 16(2), 181-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/game.1996.0081

Engel, C. (2011). Dictator games: A meta study. Experimental Economics, 14(4), 583-610. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10683-011-9283-

Evans, A. M., Dillon, K. D., & Rand, D. G. (2015). Fast but not intuitive, slow but not reflective: Decision conflict drives reaction times in social dilemmas. Journal of. Experimental Psychology: General, 144(5), 951. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000107

Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817-868. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/003355399556151

Grossman, P. J., & Eckel, C. C. (2015). Giving versus taking for a cause. Economics Letters, 132, 28-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2015.04.002

Haar, J., & Spell, C. (2009). How does distributive justice affect work attitudes? The moderating effects of autonomy. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(8), 1827-1842. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585190903087248

Hamann, K., Warneken, F., Greenberg, J., & Tomasello, M. (2011). Collaboration encourages equal sharing in children but not chimpanzees. Nature, 476, 328-331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature10278

Kanngiesser, P., & Hood, B. M. (2014). Young children’s understanding of ownership rights for newly made objects. Cognitive Development, 29, 30-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2013.09.003

Kanngiesser, P., Gjersoe, N. L., & Hood, B. M. (2010). The effect of creative labor on propertyownership transfer by preschool children and adults. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1236-1241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797610380701

Konow, J. (1996). A positive theory of economic fairness. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 31(1), 13-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(96)00862-1

Konow, J. (2001). Fair and square: The four sides of distributive justice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 46(2), 137-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00194-9

Korenok, O., Millner, E. L., & Razzolini, L. (2014). Taking, giving, and impure altruism in dictator games. Experimental Economics, 17(3), 488-500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10683-013-9379-3

Moll, H., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Co-operation and human cognition: The Vygotskian intelligence hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 362(1480), 639-648. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.2000

Neary, K. R., Van de Vondervoort, J. W., & Friedman, O. (2012). Artifacts and natural kinds: Children’s judgments about whether objects are owned. Developmental Psychology, 48(1), 149-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0025661

Nishi, A., Christakis, N. A., Evans, A. M., O’Malley, A. J., & Rand, D. G. (2016). Social environment shapes the speed of cooperation. Scientific Reports, 6, 29622. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep29622

Oxoby, R. J., & Spraggon, J. M. (2008). Mine and yours: Property rights in dictator games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 65(3-4), 703-713. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2005.12.006

Pierce, J., & Jussila, I. (2010). Collective psychological ownership within the work and organizational context: Construct introduction and elaboration. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(6), 810-834. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.628

Pierce, J., O’Driscoll, M., & Coghlan, A. (2004). Work environment structure and psychological ownership: The mediating effects of control. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144(5), 507-534. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.144.5.507-534

Rand, D. G., Greene, J. D., & Nowak, M. A. (2012). Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature, 489(7416), 427 430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11467

Sampaio, L. R., & Cabral, G. R. E. (2015). Differences in allocation patterns and in the use of distributive principles emerge from children of brazilian parents in Brazil and in the United States. Suma Psicológica, 22(1), 19-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sumpsi.2015.05.003

Sampaio, L. R., Camino, C. P. S., & Roazzi, A. (2009). Justiça distributiva: uma revisão da literatura psicossocial e desenvolvimentista. Psicologia em Estudo (Maringá), 14(4), 631-640. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-73722009000400003

Shye, S. (2014). Faceted Action System Theory (FAST). In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research (pp.2119-2125). Dordrecht: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_3616

Skarzynska, K. (1989). Evaluative perspective and distributive justice. In N. Eisenberg, J. Roykowsky, & E. Staub (Orgs.), Social and moral values: Individual and societal perspectives (pp.139-152). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum

Tomasello, M., & Vaish, A. (2013). Origins of human cooperation and morality. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 231-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143812

Tomasello, M., & Warneken, F. (2008). Share and share alike. Nature, 454, 1057-1058. http:/dx.doi.org/10.1038/4541057a

Vogelsang, M., & Tomasello, M. (2016). Giving is nicer than taking: Preschoolers reciprocate based onthe social intentions of the distributor. PloS One, 11(1), e0147539. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147539

Warneken, F., Lohse, K., Melis, A., & Tomasello, M. (2011). Young children share the spoils after collaboration. Psychological Science, 22(2), 267-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797610395392

Descargas

Publicado

2023-02-16

Cómo citar

CABRAL, G. R. E., SAMPAIO, L. R., & ROAZZI, A. (2023). Distributive judgments in cooperative production contexts. Estudos De Psicologia, 35(2). Recuperado a partir de https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/estpsi/article/view/7451

Número

Sección

PSICOLOGIA SOCIAL E ORGANIZACIONAL