Adaptation and Internal Validation ofTwo Empathy Scales for Use in Brazil

Authors

  • Sílvia Helena Koller UFRGS
  • Cleonice Camino Universidade Federal da Paraíba
  • J'aims Ribeiro Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

Keywords:

empathy, affect, cognition, behavior

Abstract

The aim oftliis study was to adapt and validate two scales of empathy to be used in Brazil. The Interpersonal Reactivity Index ofDavis (EMRI, in Portuguese) has three subscales: emotional (CE), cognitive (CG), and behavioral (CC) components of empathy. Bryant's Empathy Scale for Children and Adolescents (EECA, in Portuguese) has 22 items. Thirty-two hundred adolescents, high and low SES, 14 to 16 years old, both sexes, ofpublic and private schools of João Pessoa/PB and Porto Alegre/RS were evaluated. The reliability analysis ofthe subscales showed EMRI alpha = 0,75, CE alpha = 0,67, CG alpha = 0,63, CCalpha = 0,54, and EECA alpha = 0,74, which are considered adequate, and recommend the research use ofPortuguese version in Brazil. Convergent validity was found among the EECA scale, CG, CA, and CC subscales of
EMRI.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aronfreed, J. (1964). The origins of self-criticism. Psychological Review, 71,193-218.

Aronfreed, 1. (1968).Conduct and conscience: The socialization of internalized control over behavior. New York: Academic Press.

Biaggio, A. M. B. (1988a). Desenvolvimento moral: Vinte anos de pesquisa no Brasil. Psicologia: Reflexão e Critica, 2(1/2), 60-69.

Biaggio, A. M. B. (1988b). Pesquisa em psicologia do desenvolvimento: Tendências e exemplos. In: Associação Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação (arg.), Anais do II Simpósio Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Intercâmbio Científico (pp. 9-34). Gramado: ANPEPP.

Bryant, B. K. (1982). An index of empathy for children and adolescents. Child Development,53, 413-425.

Camino, C., Camino L., & Leyens, J. (1996). Julgamento moral, emoção e empatia. In: Z. Trindade & C. Camino (Orgs.), Cognição social e juízo moral (pp. 109-135). São Paulo: ANPEPP.

Carlo, G., & Koller, S. (1998). Desenvolvimento pró-social em crianças e adolescentes: aspectos conceituais, metodológicos e pesquisas no Brasil. Psicologia Teoria e Pesquisa, 14, 161-174.

Carlo, G., Koller, S., Eisenberg, N., da Silva, M. S., & Frohlich, C. B. (1996). A cross national study on the relations among prosocial moral reasoning, gender role orientations and prosocial behaviors. Developmental Psychology, 32, 231-240.

Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy.JSAS Cata-log of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.

Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1),113-126.

Eisenberg, N., & Strayer, J. (1987).Empathy and its development. Cambridge: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.

Eisenberg, N., Zhou, Q., & Koller, S. H. (no prelo). Brazilian adolescents' prosocial moral judgment and behavior: relations to sympathy, perspective taking, ender-role orientation, and demographic characteristics. Child Development.

Hoffman, M. L. (1976). Empathy, role-taking, guilt and development of altruistic motives. In: T. Lickona (Org.), Moral development and behavior: Theory, research and social issues(pp. 124-143). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Hoffman, M. L. (1977) Sex differences in empathy and relates behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 84 (4), 712-722.

Hoffman, M. L. (1982). Development of prosocial motivation: Empathy and guilt. New York: Academic Press.

Hoffman, M. L. (1990). The contribution of empathy to justice and moral judgment. In: N. Eisenberg & J. Strayer (Orgs.), Empathy and its developments(pp. 47-80). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hogan, R. (1969). Development of an empathy scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33, 307-316.

Hogan, R. (1973). Moral conduct and moral character: A psychological perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 79, 217-232.

Hogan, R. (1975). Moral development and the structure of personality. In: D. de Palma&1.M. Foley (Orgs.), Moral development: Current theory and research(pp. 153-167). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and Sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In: D. A. Goslin (Org.), Handbook of socialization theory and research(pp. 347-480). Chicago: Rand McNally.

Kohlberg, L. (1976).Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive developmental approach. In: T. Lickona (Org.), Moral development and behavior: Theory, research and social issues(pp. 31-53). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Mehrabian, A., &Epstein, N. (1972). A measure of emotional empathy. Journal of Personality, 40 (4), 525-543.

Ribeiro, J. (1996).O julgamento moral, a tomada de perspectiva do outro e a consideração empática: Um estudo correlacional. Dissertação de Mestrado não-publicada, Curso de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia Social, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa, Paraíba.

Selman, R. L. (1971). The relation of role taking to the development of moral judgement in children. Child Development, 42, 79-91.

Selman, R. L. (1976). Social-cognitive understanding: A guide to educational and clinical practice. In: T. Lickona (Org.), Moral development

Published

2001-12-31

How to Cite

Koller, S. H. ., Camino, C., & Ribeiro, J. . (2001). Adaptation and Internal Validation ofTwo Empathy Scales for Use in Brazil. Psychological Studies, 18(3). Retrieved from https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/estpsi/article/view/6624