COMPUTERIZED SIMULATORS AND SELF-PERCEIVED CONDUCT OF MALE AND FEMALE STUDENTS OFPSYCHOLOGY

Authors

  • Ebenézer A. de OLIVEIRA Universidade Federal de Santa Maria

Keywords:

undergraduate teaching, informatization of education, sex roles

Abstract

This study tested the effects of introducing lab activities with a computerized simulator on undergraduate Psychology students' School Attendance and self-perceived lnterest, Comprehension ot curriculum materiais, and Peer Cooperation. Sex effects were also examined in the 18 temale and 5 male students that participated. As predicted, ali variables presented a mean increase as a tunction ot simulator use. There was also a signiticant interaction between Sex and Simulator on Attendance, suggesting that ma/e students benetited better than their temale counterparts trom the new pedagogical tool. The temale students, on the other hand, showed higher índices of Attendance and Cooperation than the mate students, regardless of curriculum materiais. These results are discussed in terms of undergraduate teachingllearning and sex-role stereotypes. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AGUlAR, P. (1989). O uso do computador por crianças com dificuldades de aprendizado Monografia de especialização. Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras Imaculada Conceição. Santa Maria, RS.

ANDRIOLA, W. B. (1996). O uso de computadores na avaliação psicológica: Verificação de sua influência sobre o desempenho individual num teste de raciocínio verbal (RV). Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 9, 257-268.

BANDURA, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

BANDURA, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

CLAY, R. A. (1997). A new era of teaching tools engages students. The APA Monitor, August, 1-3.

DWECK, C. S., Davidson, W., Nelson, S. & Enna, B. (1978). Sex differences in learned helplessness: I. Differential debilitation with peer and adult evaluators. Developmental Psychology, 14, 268-276.

GLASS, G. V. & Hopkins, K. D. (1984).Statistical methods in education and psychology. 2nd.ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

KRAMES, L., Graham, J. & Alloway, T. (1996). Sniffy the virtual rat. Version 4.5 for Windows. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.

LEPPER, M. R. (1985). Microcomputers in education: Motivational and social issues. American Psychologist, 40,1-18.

MACCOBY, E. E. (1990). Gender and relationships: A developmental account. American Psychologist, 45, 513-520.

PERES, R. U. (1997). Novas tecnologias da informação: Atitudes de docentes de ciências sociais e humanas. Dissertação de mestrado. Pontífica Universidade Católica de Campinas, Campinas.

SLAVIN, R. E. (1991). Synthesis of research on cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, February, 71-82.

SLAVIN, R. E. (1994). Educational psychology: Theory and practice. Fourth ed. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

U.S. Bureau of the Census (1994). Statistical abstracts of the United States. 114th ed. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

VALENTE, J. A. (1991). Usos do computador na educação. Em J. A. Valente (Org.), Liberando a mente: Computadores na educação especial Campinas: UNICAMP.

Published

1999-12-31

How to Cite

OLIVEIRA, E. A. de . (1999). COMPUTERIZED SIMULATORS AND SELF-PERCEIVED CONDUCT OF MALE AND FEMALE STUDENTS OFPSYCHOLOGY . Psychological Studies, 16(3). Retrieved from https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/estpsi/article/view/6567