Open access in the context of Information Science research

Authors

Keywords:

Information access, Bibliometric, Librarianship, Statistics, Scientific production

Abstract

Open access is a scientific dissemination mechanism that aims to democratize access to scientific research results, removing barriers
to access and permission to published content. Such barriers often marginalize authors, institutions, or countries with less financial
resources. In this context, this work aims to understand the world scenario of open access research, in the field of Information Science, in the last six years (2015 to 2020) and to identify possible suggestions that can improve the future of research on this subject. Bibliometric analysis was used to achieve these objectives. We used Scopus database as a source of information, combined with the SciVal tool. As a result, 1139 documents were retrieved on the open access area, and from the analyses, it was possible to characterize the sample, identify the main contributors and verify the quality of research on the open access field. We were also able to identify the main actors in the international scope, the research areas most engaged with the open access and to propose, from the complementary literature, a proposal to promote open access research through international and national collaborations among other authors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baas, J. et al. Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies, v. 1, n. 1, p. 377-386, 2020. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019

Borrego, Á.; Anglada, L.; Abadal, E. Transformative agreements: do they pave the way to open access? Learned Publishing, v. 34, n. 2, p. 216-232, 2021. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1347

Bosch, S.; Henderson, K. Predicting the Future in 3,000 Words and Charts: the Library Journal Serials Pricing Article. The Serials Librarian, v. 74, p. 224-227, 2018. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2018.1430442

Caballero-Rivero, A.; Sánchez-Tarragó, N.; Santos, R. N. M. Práticas de Ciência Aberta da comunidade acadêmica brasileira: estudo a partir da produção científica. Transinformação, v. 31, e190029, 2019. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0889201931e190029

Chang, C. C. Business models for open access journals publishing. Online Information Review, v. 30, n. 6, p. 699-713, 2006. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520610716171

Costa, M. P.; Leite, F. C. L. Open access in the world and Latin America: a review since the Budapest Open Access Initiative. TransInformação, v. 28, n. 1, p. 33-45, 2016. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-08892016002800003

Douglas, K. The serials crisis. The Serials Librarian, v. 18, n. 1-2, p. 111-121, 1990. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1300/j123v18n01_08

González Brambila, C. N.; Olivares-Vázquez, J. L. Patterns and evolution of publication and co-authorship in Social Sciences in Mexico. Scientometrics, v. 126, n. 3, p. 2595-2626, 2021. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03644-w

Jurchen, S. Open access and the serials crisis: the role of academic libraries. Technical Services Quarterly, v. 37, n. 2, p. 160-170, 2020.

Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2020.1728136

Kuramoto, H. Scholarly information: purpose of a new model for the Brazil. Ciência da Informação, v. 35, n. 2, p. 91-102, 2006.

Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-19652006000200010

Li, J.; Li, Y. Patterns and evolution of coauthorship in China’s humanities and social sciences. Scientometrics, v. 102, n. 3, p. 1997-2010, 2015. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1471-8

Liu, X. et al. The research landscape of big data: a bibliometric analysis. Library Hi Tech, v. 38, n. 2, p. 367-384, 2020. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-01-2019-0024

Lundén, A.; Smith, C.; Wideberg, B.-M. National licence negotiations advancing the open access transition: a view from the Sweden. Insights: the UKSG Journal, v. 31, 2018. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.412

Meadows, A. J. A comunicação científica. Brasília: Briquet de Lemos, 1999. 268 p.

Mueller, S. P. M. A comunicação científica e o movimento de acesso livre ao conhecimento. Ciência da Informação, v. 35, n. 2, p. 27-38, 2006. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-19652006000200004

Read the Budapest Open Access Initiative. 2002. Disponível em: https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read. Acesso em: 1 maio 2021.

Richter, A. K. Open access: a never ending story? Information Services and Use, v. 28, n. 2, p. 97-103, 2008. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-2008-0558

Sengupta, P. Open access publication: Academic colonialism or knowledge philanthropy? Geoforum, v. 118, p. 203-206, 2021. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.04.001

Suber, P. Open access. Cambridge, MA: MIT Pess, 2012. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00049670.2013.811775

Torres-Salinas, D. Ritmo de crecimiento diario de la producción científica sobre Covid-19. Análisis en bases de datos y repositorios en acceso abierto. El Profesional de la Información, v. 29, n. 2, p. 1-6, 2020. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.mar.15

Published

2023-01-11

How to Cite

Gäal, L. P. M., & Martins, M. S. (2023). Open access in the context of Information Science research. Transinformação, 34, 1–12. Retrieved from https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/transinfo/article/view/7254

Issue

Section

Original