O “FAIR Accessor” e a autenticidade da informação arquivística digital
Palavras-chave:
Descrição arquivística, Dados FAIR, Diplomática, Preservação digital, Informação digitalResumo
O crescimento constante no volume, variedade e complexidade da informação digital coloca uma série de problemas que dificultam
a preservação da informação digital ao mesmo tempo que se procura garantir que essa permaneça autêntica, fidedigna, acessível,
confiável, inteligível e reutilizável pelo tempo necessário. Este estudo explora os conceitos de uma possível implementação de um
“FAIR Accessor”, uma tecnologia desenvolvida com o objetivo de criar dados de investigação pesquisáveis, acessíveis, interoperáveis e reutilizáveis AIR). Tratase de uma infraestrutura capaz de apoiar a descrição arquivística e de garantir a autenticidade da informação. A investigação consiste numa revisão de literatura qualitativa de obras selecionadas nas áreas da Ciência da Informação e Diplomática e da gestão de dados científicos, em particular nos princípios FAIR, seguida de uma discussão de como certos conceitoschave de cada domínio se sobrepõem e, potencialmente, se complementam mutuamente. Concluise que a infraestrutura de um “FAIR Accessor” pode revelarse útil em enriquecer a descrição arquivística além de poder contribuir para a presunção da autenticidade dos documentos de arquivo.
Downloads
Referências
Arnold, L.; van der Walt, T. Towards a better description of
genre archives: a case study of travel archives. Cataloging and
Classification Quarterly, v. 57, n. 6, p. 369392, 2019. Doi: https://
doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2019.1656693.
Bountouri, L.; Gratz, P.; Sanmartin, F. Digital preservation: how
to be trustworthy. Olimje: Springer International Publishing,
p. 364374. Available from: http://link.springer.
com/10.1007/9783319758268. Accessed on: Mar.12, 2021.
Cook, T. Archival science and postmodernism: new formulations
for old concepts. Archival Science, v. 1, p. 324, 2001. Doi: https://
doi.org/10.1007/BF02435636.
Cook, T. Electronic records, paper minds: the revolution in
Information management and archives in the postcustodial
and postmodernist era. Archives & Social Studies: A Journal of
Interdisciplinary Research, v. 1, n. 0, p. 399443, 2007. Available
from: https://archivo.cartagena.es/doc/Archivos_Social_
Studies/Vol1_n0/06cook_electronic.pdf. Accessed on: Mar. 12,
Corujo, L.; Silva, C. G.; Revez, J. Digital curation and costs:
approaches and perceptions. In: TEEM ‘16: Proceedings of the
Fourth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems
for Enhancing Multiculturality, 2016, Salamanca. Proceedings
Online […]. Salamanca: Facultad de Biblioteconomía y
Documentación de la Universidad de Salamanca, 2016. p.
Doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3012430.3012529.
Dimou, A. et al. RML: a generic language for integrated RDF
mappings of heterogeneous data. In: Proceedings of the 7th
Workshop on Linked Data on the Web, 2014, Seoul. Prceedings
Online […]. Seoul: CEUR, 2014. Available from: http://events.
linkeddata.org/ldow2014/papers/ldow2014_paper_01.pdf.
Accessed on: Mar. 12, 2021.
Duranti, L. The Archival Bond. Archives and Museum
Informatics, v. 11, n. 3, p. 213218, 1997. Doi: http://doi.
org/10.1023/A:1009025127463.
Duranti, L. Theoretical Elaborations into Archival Management
in Canada (TEAM Canada): Implementing the theory of
preservation of authentic records in digital systems in small
and mediumsized archival organizations. [S.l.:s.n.], 2007.
SSHRC CURA InterPARES 3 Project Proposal. Available from:
http://www.interpares.org/display_file.cfm?doc=ip3_
detailed_project_proposal_v10.pdf. Accessed on: Mar. 12, 2021
Duranti, L.; Blanchette, J. The authenticity of electronic
records: the InterPARES approach. In: Proceedings of IS&T
Archiving Conference, 2004, San Antonio. Proceedings
Online […]. San Antonio: IS&T, 2004. p. 215220. Available
from: http://www.interpares.org/display_file.cfm?doc=ip12_
dissemination_cpr_duranti~blanchette_ist_2004.pdf.
Accessed on: Mar. 12, 2021.
Duranti, L.; Eastwood, T. Protecting electronic evidence: a
progress report on research study and its methodology.
Archivi & Computer, n. 3, p. 213250, 1995.
Duranti, L.; MacNeil, H. The protection of the integrity of
electronic records: an overview of the UBCMAS Research
Project. Archivaria, v. 42, p. 4667, 1996. Available from: https://
archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12153/13158.
Accessed on: Mar. 12, 2021.
European Commission. DirectorateGeneral for Research &
Innovation. Guidelines on FAIR data management in Horizon
Brussels: European Commission, 2016. Available from:
http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/
grants_manual/hi/oa_pilot/h2020hioadatamgt_en.pdf.
Accessed on: Mar. 12, 2021.
Ferreira, M.; Saraiva, R.; Rodrigues, E. Estado da arte em
preservação digital. [S.l.]: RCAAP, 2012. Available from: http://
repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/handle/1822/17049. Accessed
on: Mar. 12, 2021.
Fielding, R.; Taylor, R. N. Principled design of the modern Web
architecture. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, v. 2, n. 2, p. 115150, 2002. Available from: http://portal.acm.org/
citation.cfm?doid=514183.514185. Accessed on: Mar. 12, 2021.
FringsHessami, V. The societal embeddedness of records:
teaching the meaning of the fourth dimension of the Records
Continuum Model in different cultural contexts. Archival
Science, v. 21, p. 139154, 2020. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/
s10502020093496.
Gilliland, A. Setting the stage. In: Baca, M. (org.). Introduction to
Metadata. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute, 2016.
p. 120.
Graham, P. S. Requirements for the digital research library.
College & Research Libraries, v. 56, n. 4, p. 331339, 1995.
Available from: http://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/article/
view/14982. Accessed on: Mar. 12, 2021.
Hemphill, L.; Leonard, S. H.; Hedstrom, M. Saving social
media data: understanding data management practices
among social media researchers and their implications for
archives. Journal of the Association for Information Science
and Technology, v. 72, n. 1, p. 97109, 2020. Doi: https://doi.
org/10.1002/asi.24368.
MacNeil, H. Archival theory and practice: between two
paradigms. Archivaria, n. 37, p. 620, 2007. Available from: https://
archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/11982.
Accessed on: Mar. 12, 2021.
Pinto, M. M. PRESERVMAP: um roteiro da preservação na era
digital. Porto: Edições Afrontamento, 2009.
Ribeiro, F. O perfil profissional do arquivista na sociedade da informação. Trabalhos de Antropologia e Etnologia, v. 45, n. 1,p. 4957, 2005. Available from: http://ler.letras.up.pt/uploads/ficheiros/artigo8871.pdf. Accessed on: Mar. 12, 2021.
Rogers, C. Virtual authenticity: authenticity of digital records from theory to practice. 2015. 231 f. Thesis (Doctorate in Library, Archival and Information Studies) – University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 2015. Available from: https://open.library.ubc.ca/cIRcle/collections/ubctheses/24/items/1.0166169. Accessed on: Mar. 12, 2021.
Rolan, G. Towards interoperable recordkeeping systems: a metamodel for recordkeeping metadata. Records Management Journal, v. 27, n. 2, p. 125148, 2017. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ0920160027.
Silva, A. M. A informação: da compreensão do fenómeno e construção do objeto científico. Porto: Edições Afrontamento, 2006.
Silva, A. M.; Ribeiro, F. Das “ciências” documentais à ciência da informação: ensaio epistemológico para um novo modelo curricular. 2. ed. Porto: Edições Afrontamento, 2008.
InterPARES1. Authenticity task force report: the Longterm preservation of authentic electronic records: Findings of the InterPARES Project. San Miniato: Archilab, 2002. Available from: http://www.interpares.org/book/interpares_book_d_part1.pdf. Accessed on: Mar. 12, 2021.
InterPARES3. Record Characteristic. In: Interpares. The InterPARES Project Dictionary. [S.l.]: Interpares, 2012. Available from: http://www.interpares.org/ip3/ip3_terminology_db.cfm?status=dictionary. Accessed on: Mar. 12, 2021.
InterPARES3. Authenticity. In: Interpares. The InterPARES Project Dictionary. [S.l.]: Interpares, 2012. Available from: http://www. i n terpares.org/ip3/ip3_terminology_db.cfm?status=dictionary. Accessed on: Mar. 12, 2021.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Preserving the digital heritage. Amsterdam: Netherlands National Commission for UNESCO and European Commission on Preservation and Access, 2007. v. 31. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1464905508000146. Accessed on: Mar. 12, 2021.
Upward, F. Modelling the continuum as a paradigm shift in recordkeeping and archiving processes, and beyond – a personal reflection. Records Management Journal, v. 10, n. 3, p. 115139, 2000. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007259.
Verborgh, R. et al. Triple pattern fragments: a lowcost knowledge graph interface for the Web. Journal of Web Semantics, v. 3738, p. 184206, 2016. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2016.03.003.
W3C. Linked Data Platform 1.0. [S.l.]: W3, 2015. Available from: https://www.w3.org/TR/ldp/. Accessed on: Mar. 12, 2021.
Wilkinson, M. et al. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, v. 3, e160018, 2016. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fsdata.2016.18.
Wilkinson, M. et al. Interoperability and FAIRness through a novel combination of Web technologies. PeerJ Computer Science, v. 3, n. 110, e110, 2017. Doi: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerjcs.110.
Zeng, M. L.; Qin, J. Metadata. 2nd ed. London: Facet Publishing, 2016.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
