Public open spaces and quality of life

evidence from the WHOQOL-BREF protocol

Autores/as

  • Eduarda Botti Beraldo Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ambiente Construído https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4474-7643
  • Ana Clara Carvalho Tourinho Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ambiente Construído https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3411-5941
  • Sabrina Andrade Barbosa Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Escola Superior de Desenho Industrial, Departamento de Arquitetura e Urbanismo | Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ambiente Construído https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4129-5541
  • Samuel Rodrigues Castro Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Faculdade de Engenharia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ambiente Construído https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4053-7040
  • Klaus Chaves Alberto Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ambiente Construído https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2845-8307

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24220/2318-0919v19e2022a5288

Palabras clave:

Health, Questionnaire, Statistical analysis, Urban squares

Resumen

In the last decades, rapid urbanization has reduced urban green areas and public open spaces, influencing the health and quality of life of the population. This study analyses the influence of living nearby squares on the perception of quality of life. By using the WHOQOL-BREF Protocol, the quality of life of residents living within two radiuses from two squares located in different neighbourhoods in Brazil were compared. The results have been discussed based on the interviewees’ characteristics and the Public Open Space physical attributes.
The results indicated that living close to the urban squares can have positive impacts on quality of life.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

ALDERTON, A. et al. What is the meaning of urban liveability for a city in a low-to-middle-income, country? Contextualising liveability for Bangkok, Thailand. Globalization and Health, v. 15, n. 1, p. 51, 2019.

ALMANZA, E. et al. A study of community design, greenness, and physical activity in children using satellite, GPS and accelerometer data. Health & Place, v. 18, n. 1, p. 46-54, 2012.

AMBREY, C. L. Urban greenspace, physical activity and wellbeing: the moderating role of perceptions of neighbourhood affability and incivility. Land Use Policy, v. 57, p. 638-644, 2016.

BAHRINI, F.; BELL, S.; MOKHTARZADEH, S. The relationship between the distribution and use patterns of parks and their spatial accessibility at the city level: a case study from Tehran, Iran. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, v. 27, p. 332-342, 2017.

BENITA, F.; BANSAL, G.; TUNÇER, B. Public spaces and happiness: evidence from a large-scale field experiment. Health & Place, v. 56, p. 9-18, 2019.

BRINDLEY, P. et al. Is more always better? Exploring field survey and social media indicators of quality of urban greenspace, in relation to health. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, v. 39, p. 45-54, 2019.

BROWN, G.; RHODES, J.; DADE, M. An evaluation of participatory mapping methods to assess urban park benefits. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 178, p. 18-31, 2018.

CARROLL, S. J. et al. Contributions of multiple built environment features to 10-year change in body mass index and waist circumference in a South Australian middle-aged cohort. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, v. 17, n. 3, p. 1660-4601, 2020. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030870

CHAN, C.-S. Health-related elements in green space branding in Hong Kong. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, v. 21, p. 192-202, 2017.

CHERRIE, M. P. C. et al. Green space and cognitive ageing: a retrospective life course analysis in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936. Social Science & Medicine, v. 196, p. 56-65, 2018.

CLELAND, C. et al. Built environment correlates of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in older adults: a comparative review between high and low-middle income countries. Health Place, v. 57, p. 277-304, 2019.

COLOM, A. et al. Association between access to public open spaces and physical activity in a mediterranean population at high cardiovascular risk. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, v. 15, n. 6, p. 1660-4601, 2018.

COMSTOCK, N. et al. Neighborhood attachment and its correlates: exploring neighborhood conditions, collective efficacy, and gardening. Journal of Environmental Psychology, v. 30, n. 4, p. 435-442, 2010.

CRANNEY, L. et al. Impact of an outdoor gym on park users’ physical activity: a natural experiment. Health & Place, v. 37, p. 26-34, 2016.

DIAS, A. F. et al. Distance from home to the nearest park and the use of the parks for physicl activity: the mediator role of road safety perception in adolescents. Public Health, v. 168, p. 9-16, 2019.

DZHAMBOV, A. M.; DIMITROVA, D. D. Green spaces and environmental noise perception. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, v. 14, n. 4, p. 1000-1008, 2015.

EKKEL, E. D.; DE VRIES, S. Nearby green space and human health: evaluating accessibility metrics. Landscape and Urban Planning, v.157, p. 214-220, 2017.

FLORINDO, A. A. et al. Public open spaces and leisure-time walking in Brazilian adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, v. 14, n. 6, 2017.

GILES-CORTI, B. G. et al. The influence of urban design on neighbourhood walking following residential relocation: Longitudinal results from the RESIDE study. Social Science & Medicine, v. 77, p. 20-30, 2013.

GÓMEZ, L. G. et al. Prevalence and factors associated with walking and bicycling for transport among young adults in two low-income localities of Bogotá, Colombia. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, v. 2, p. 445-459, 2005.

HALLAL, P. et al. Lessons learned after 10 years of IPAQ use in Brazil and Colombia. Journal of physical activity & health, v. 7, Suppl 2, p. S259-264, 2010.

HILLS, A. P.; FARPOUR-LAMBERT, N. J.; BYRNE, N. M. Precision medicine and healthy living: The importance of the built environment. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, v. 62, n. 1, p. 34-38, 2019.

HOFFIMANN, E.; BARROS, H.; RIBEIRO, A. I. Socioeconomic Inequalities in Green Space Quality and Accessibility-Evidence from a Southern European City. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, v. 14, n. 8, p. 1660-4601, 2017.

HOOPER, P. et al. Positive Habitats for physical activity: examining use of parks and its contribution to physical activity levels in mid-to older-aged adults. Health & Place, v. 63, p. 102308, 2020.

INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA. Censo Demográfico 2010: dados da amostra. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 2010.

IVES, C. D. et al. Capturing residents’ values for urban green space: mapping, analysis and guidance for practice. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 161, p. 32-43, 2017.

JANSEN, F. M. et al. How do type and size of natural environments relate to physical activity behavior? Health & Place, v. 46, p. 73-81, 2017.

KEMPERMAN, A.; TIMMERMANS, H. Green spaces in the direct living environment and social contacts of the aging population. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 129, p. 44-54, 2014.

LIU, H. et al. The relationships between urban parks, residents’ physical activity, and mental health benefits: A case study from Beijing, China. Journal of Environmental Management, v. 190, n. 1095-8630, p. 223-230, 2017a.

LIU, Y. et al. Assessing the urban environmental quality of mountainous cities: a case study in Chongqing, China. Ecological Indicators, v. 81, p. 132-145, 2017b.

LU, L. et al. Internet addiction in Tibetan and Han Chinese middle school students: prevalence, demographics and quality of life. Psychiatry Research, v. 268, p. 131-136, 2018.

LYNCH, K. A boa forma da cidade. 70 ed. Lisboa: 2007.

MORAN, M. R. et al. Park use, perceived park proximity, and neighborhood characteristics: evidence from 11 cities in Latin America. Cities, v. 105, p. 102817, 2020.

NASUTION, A. D.; ZAHRAH, W. Community perception on Public Open Space and quality of life in Medan, Indonesia. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 153, p. 585-594, 2014.

PHAM, T.-T.-H. et al. Perception of park access and park use amongst youth in Hanoi: How cultural and local context matters. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 189, p. 156-165, 2019.

RIGOLON, A. et al. Access to urban green space in cities of the Global South: a systematic literature review. Urban Science, v. 2, p. 67-91, 2018.

RUGEL, E. J. et al. Beyond the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI): developing a natural space index for population-level health research. Environmental Research, v. 159, n. 1096-0953, p. 474-483, 2017.

SALAZAR, L. F.; RICHARD, A. C.; DICLEMENTE, R. J. Research methods in health promotion. San Francisco: Wiley & Sons, 2015. p. 608.

SENRA, S. Vitalidade urbana nas praças de Juiz de Fora: um estudo Exploratório. 2019. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ambiente Construído) – Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, 2019.

SILVA, A. T. D. et al. Distance to fitness zone, use of facilities and physical activity in adultds. Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte, v. 24, p. 157-161, 2018.

SREETHERAN, M.; VAN DEN BOSCH, C. C. K. A socio-ecological exploration of fear of crime in urban green spaces: a systematic review. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, v. 13, n. 1, p. 1-18, 2014.

STANNERS, D.; BOURDEAU, P. Europe`s environment: the Dobris assessment. [S.l.]: CEC, 1995. p. 712.

SUGIYAMA, T. et al. Public open spaces and walking for recreation: moderation by attributes of pedestrian environments. Preventive Medicine, v. 62, p. 25-29, 2014.

TANDOGAN, O.; ILHAN, B. S. Fear of crime in public spaces: from the view of women living in cities. Procedia Engineering, v. 161, p. 2011-2018, 2016.

TU, X. How do travel distance and park size influence urban park visits? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, v. 52, p. 126689, 2020.

UNITED NATIONS. World Urbanization Prospects. New York: United Nations, 2018. VAN HECKE, L. et al. Factors related with public open space use among adolescents: a study using GPS and accelerometers. International Journal of Health Geographics, v. 17, n. 1, p. 1-16, 2018.

VEITCH, J. et al. Physical activity benefits from taking your dog to the park. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 185, p. 173-179, 2019.

VEREINTE, N. Inequality matters. New York: United Nations, 2013.

WAI, A. T. P.; NITIVATTANANON, V.; KIM, S. M. Multi-stakeholder and multi-benefit approaches for enhanced utilization of public open spaces in Mandalay city, Myanmar. Sustainable Cities and Society, v. 37, p. 323-335, 2018.

WAN, C.; SHEN, G. Q.; CHOI, S. Effects of physical and psychological factors on users’ attitudes, use patterns, and perceived benefits toward urban parks. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, v. 51, p. 126691, 2020.

WARD THOMPSON, C. et al. Mitigating stress and supporting health in deprived urban communities: the importance of green space and the social environment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, v. 13, n. 4, p. 440, 2016.

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. WHO-BREF: introduction, administration, scoring and generic version of assessment. Geneva: WHO, 1996.

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. WHO European Healthy Cities Network. [S.l.]: WHO, c2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/europe/groups/who-european-healthy-cities-network. Citted: Dec. 7, 2022.

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. WHOQOL User Manual.Geneva: WHO, 1998.

XIE, B. et al. Healthy aging with parks: Association between park accessibility and the health status of older adults in urban China. Sustainable Cities and Society, v. 43, p. 476-486, 2018.

YUEN, J. W. M. et al. Influence of urban green space and facility accessibility on exercise and healthy diet in Hong Kong. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, v. 16, n. 1660-4601, p. 1514, 2019.

ZHANG, C. J. P. et al.Objectively-measured neighbourhood attributes as correlates and moderators of quality of life in older adults with different living arrangements: the ALECS cross-sectional study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, v. 16, n. 5, p. 876, 2019.

Publicado

2022-12-10

Cómo citar

Beraldo, E. B., Tourinho, A. C. C., Barbosa, S. A., Castro, S. R., & Alberto, K. C. (2022). Public open spaces and quality of life: evidence from the WHOQOL-BREF protocol. Oculum Ensaios - ISSNe 2318-0919, 19, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.24220/2318-0919v19e2022a5288

Número

Sección

Artículo de Investigación