Avances, proyectos y retos internacionales ligados al uso de tests en Psicología
Palabras clave:
Administración de tests, Evaluación, Práctica profesionalResumen
El desarrollo de la psicometría y la normalización de la práctica profesional de la Psicología delimitan un espacio Nmarcado por la importancia atribuida al uso correcto de los tests. En entornos sociales y científicos caracterizados por actitudes positivas hacia el uso de tests, disponibilidad de tests de calidad, regulación de la práctica profesional y colaboración internacional, se constituyen las asociaciones de tests nacionales e internacionales. Estas trabajan de forma conjunta en el establecimiento de directrices que, a través de una orientación pragmática, ofrecen guías para la buena práctica. En este trabajo describimos brevemente algunos de los últimos proyectos relacionados con el uso de tests, y apuntamos la importancia de las comisiones y las directrices para mejorar su uso.
Descargas
Citas
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1966). Standards for educational and psychological tests. Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research Association.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1974). Standards for educational and psychological tests. Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research Association.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological tests. Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research Association
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological tests. Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research Association.
Angoff, W. H. (1988). Validity: An evolving concept. In H. Wainer & H. I. Braun (Eds.), Test validity (pp.19-32). Hillsdale: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
Bartram, D. (2001). The development of international guidelines on test use: The international test commission project. International Journal of Testing, 1(1), 33-53.
Bartram, D. (2016). The changing face of testing in work and organizational settings: A personal journey. Paper presented at the 10th Conference of the International Test Commission, Vancouver, Canada.
Bartram, D., & Hambleton, R. K. (2005). Computer-based testing and the internet: Issues and advances. New York: Wiley.
Bartram, D., & Hambleton, R. K. (2016). The ITC Guidelines. International standards and guidelines relating tests and testing. In F. T. L. Leong, D. Bartram, F. Cheung, K. F. Geisinger, & D. Iliescu (Eds.), The ITC international handbook of testing and assessment. New York: Oxford University Press.
CEB. (2014). Gamification in recruiting: Trends and best practices. Retrieved September, 3, 2016, from https://www.executiveboard.com/blogs/gamification-inrecruiting-trends-and-best-practices/
Coyne, I., & Bartram, D. (2006). Design and development of the ITC guidelines on computer-based and internet delivered testing. International Journal of Testing, 6(2), 133-142.
Cronbach, L. J. (1984). Essentials of psychological testing (4rd ed.). New York: Harper.
De Argaez, E. (2016). Internet world stats. Retrieved September 3, 2016, from http://www.internetworldstats.com/
De Boeck, P., & Elosua, P. (2016). Reliability and validity: History, notions, methods, discussion. In F. T. L. Leong,
D. Bartram, F. Cheung, K. F. Geisinger, & D. Iliescu
(Eds.), The ITC international handbook of testing and
assessment. New York: Oxford University Press.
DuBois, P. H. (1970). A history of psychological testing. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Elosua, P. (2003). Sobre la validez de los tests. Psicothema, 15(2), 315-321.
Elosua, P. (2012). Tests publicados en España: Usos, costumbres y asignaturas pendientes. Papeles del Psicólogo, 33(1), 12-21.
Elosua, P. (2016). Testing in linguistically diverse contexts. Symposium presented at 10th Conference of the International Test Commission, Vancouver, Canada.
Elosua, P., & Geisenger, K. (2016). Cuarta evaluación de tests editados en España: Forma y fondo. Papeles del Psicólogo, 37(2), 3-13.
Elosua, P., & Iliescu, D. (2012). Tests in Europe. Where we are and where we should to go. International Journal of Testing, 12(2), 157-175.
Elosua, P., & Muñiz, J. (2013). Proyectos españoles para una mejora en el uso de los Tests. Psiencia. Latin American Journal of Psychological Science, 5(2), 139-143.
Evers, A., Muñiz, J., Bartram, D., Boben, D., Egeland, J., Fernández-Hermida, J.R., … Urbánek, T. (2012). Testing practices in the 21st Century: Developments and European psychologists’ opinions. European Psychologist, 17, 300-319.
Evers, A., Muñiz, J., Hagemeister, C., Høstmælingen, A., Lindley, P., Sjöberg, A., & Bartram, B. (2013). Assessing the quality of tests: Revision of the EFPA review model. Psicothema, 25(3), 283-291.
Fernández-Ballesteros, R., De Bruyn, E. E. J., Godoy, A., Hornke, L., Ter Laak, J., Vizcarro, C., Westhoff, K., Westmeyer H., & Zacagnini, J. L. (2001). Guidelines for the Assessment Process (GAP): A proposal for discussion. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17(3), 187-200.
Gould, S. J. (1981). The mismesure of man. New York: Norton.
Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory: Principles and applications. Boston: Kluwer.
International Test Commission. (2001). International guidelines on test use. International Journal of Testing, 1(2), 95-114.
International Test Commission. (2005). ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests. Retrieved September 3, 2016, from https://www.intestcom.org/files/guideline_test_adaptatiopn.pdf
International Test Commission. (2006). International guidelines on computer-based and Internet-delivered testing. International Journal of Testing, 6(2), 143-172.
International Test Commission. (2014a). ITC guidelines on quality control in scoring, test analysis, andreporting of test scores. International Journal of mTesting, 14(3), 195-217.
International Test Commission. (2014b). ITC statement mon the use of tests and other assessment instruments mfor research purposes. Retrieved September 3, 2016, from https://www.intestcom.org/files/statement_using_tests_for_research.pdf
International Test Commission. (2015). ITC guidelines on practitioner use of tests revisions, obsolete tests, and test disposal. Retrieved September 3, 2016, from https://www.intestcom.org/files/guideline_test_disposal.pdf
International Test Commission. (2016). The ITC guidelines on the security of tests, examinations, and other assessments. International Journal of Testing, 16(3), 181-204.
International Organization for Standardization. (2011). Procedures and methods to assess people in work and organizational settings (part 1 and 2). Geneva: Author.
Kane, M. (2001). Current concerns in validity theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38(4), 319-342.
Kane, M. (2006). Validation. In R. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp.17-64), Westport: American
Council on Education and Praeger.
Kane, M. (2009). Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. In R.W. Lissitz (Ed.), The concept of validity: Revisions, new directions, and applications (pp.39-64). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Kane, M. (2013). Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. Journal of Educational Measurement,50(1), 1-73.
Kelley, T. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. New York: MacMillan.
King, D. D., Ryan, A. M., Kantrowitz, T., Grelle, D., & Dainis, A. (2015). Mobile internet testing: An analysis of equivalence, individual differences, and reactions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 23(4), 382-394.
Lord, F. M. (1955). Estimating test reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1955(1), 325-336.
Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Markus, K. A., & Borsboom, K. A. (2013). Frontiers of test validity theory. New York: Routledge.
Mellenbergh, G. J. (2011). A conceptual introduction to psychometrics: Development, analysis, and application of psychological and educational tests. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.
Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education.
Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment. American Psychologist, 50, 741-749.
Mollenkopf, W. G. (1949). Variation of the standard error of measurement. Psychometrika, 14(3), 189-229.
Muñiz, J., Elosua, P., & Hambleton, R. K. (2013). Directrices para la traducción y adaptación de los tests: Segunda edición. Psicothema, 25(2), 151-157.
Naglieri, J. A., Drasgow, F., Schmit, M., Handler, L., Prifitera, A., Margolis, A., & Velasquez, R. (2004). Psychological testing on the Internet: New problems, old issues. American Psychologist, 59(3), 150-162.
Newton, P. E., & Shaw, S. D. (2014). Validity in educational & psychological assessment. London: Thousand Oaks.
Poortinga, Y. P., & Klieme, E. (2016). The history and status of testing across cultures and countries. In F. T. L. Leong, D. Bartram, F. Cheung, K. F. Geisinger, & D. Iliescu (Eds.), The ITC international handbook of testing and assessment. New York: Oxford University Press.
Prieto, G., & Muñiz, J. (2000). Un modelo para evaluar la calidad de los tests utilizados en España. Papeles del Psicólogo, 77, 65-71.
Spearman, C. (1907). Demonstration of formulae for true measurement of correlation. American Journal of Psychology, 18(2), 161-169.
Thorndike, L. S. (1951). Reliability. In E. F. Lindquist (Ed.), Educational measurement. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education.
Zumbo, B. D. (2014). What role does, and should, the test standards play outside of the United States of America?. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 33(4), 31-33.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Paula ELOSUA
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
