Interpersonal interactions within couples: Convergences and divergences between self-description and partner’s perception

Autores/as

Palabras clave:

Interpersonal relations, Marriage, Psychological assessment, Test validity

Resumen

Conjugality refers to the shared experience between partners characterized by an enduring bond. It is related to a high degree of intimacy, affective involvement, and different interpersonal strategies, and it is seen by partners as their most signifi cant relationship. Such intensity makes couple interaction different from any other type of relationship. The objective of this study was to verify how interpersonal attitude of the participants toward their spouses are associated with their partners and the independent interviewer’s perception of their attitudes. The results showed that the participants had a perception of themselves that was, in general, congruent with their partners’ and the interviewer’s perception. However, the spouses agreed more about their relationship roles (dominant or submissive) and disagreed on the dedicated affection (friendly or hostile) between them. In contrast, the interviewer overestimated the subjects’ attempts to control but confi rmed the presence of statements of affection. The results obtained also provided a realistic portrait of marital interactions, increasing the application spectrum of the Checklist de Relações Interpessoais (Check list of Interpersonal Transactions).

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Briggs, J. B., Finley, M. A., & Sprenkle, D. H. (2015). A Substantive and methodological review of the integrative behavioral couple therapy research program: Clinical implications for a research informed practice. Journal of Couple and Relationship Therapy, 14(3), 219-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2014.959229

Couto, G., Vandenberghe, L. M. A., Tavares, W. M., & Silva, R. L. F. C. (2012). Interações e habilidades sociais entre universitários: um estudo correlacional. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), 29(Supl), 667S-677S. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-166X2012000500003

Couto, G., Vandenberghe, L., & Tavares, W. M. (2015). Interpersonal interactions in the marital pair and mental health: A comparative and correlational study. Paidéia, 25(62), 373-382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1982-43272562201511

Cundiff, J. M., Smith, T. W., Butner, J., Critchfield, K. L., & Nealey-Moore, J. (2014). Affiliation and control in marital interaction interpersonal complementarity is present but is not associated with affect or relationship quality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(1) 35-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167214557002

Hernandez, J. A. E. (2008). Avaliação estrutural da escala de ajustamento diádico. Psicologia em Estudo, 13(3), 593-601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-73722008000300021

Kazmi, S. F., & Pervez, T. (2013). Marital adjustment of educated working and educated non working women as a factor of communication style with their spouses. International Journal of Physical and Social Sciences, 3(1), 1-16.

Kiesler, D. J. (1983). The 1982 Interpersonal Circle: A taxonomy for complementarity in human transactions. Psychological Review, 90(3), 185-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.90.3.185

Määttä, K., & Uusiautti, S. (2013). Silence is not golden: Review of studies of couple interaction. Communication Studies, 64(1), 33-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.10 80/10510974.2012.731467

Montoya, R. M., & Horton, R. S. (2013). A metaanalytic investigation of the processes underlying the similarity-attraction effect. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(1), 64-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407512452989

Silva, L. P., & Vandenberghe, L. (2009). Comunicação versus resolução de problemas numa sessão única de terapia comportamental de casal. Revista Brasileira de Terapia Comportamental e Cognitiva, 11(1), 43-60.

Veldorale-Brogan, A., Bradford, K., & Vail, A. (2010). Marital virtues and their relationship to individual functioning, communication, and relationship adjustment. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(4), 281-293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2010.498617

White, S. G., & Hatcher, C. (1984). Couple complementarity and similarity: A review of the literature. American Journal of Family Therapy, 12(1), 15-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01926188408250155

Wright, A. G., Pincus, A. L., Hopwood, C. J., Thomas, K. M., Markon, K. E., & Krueger, R. F. (2012). Na interpersonal analysis of pathological personality traits in DSM-5. Assessment, 19(3), 263-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073191112446657

Descargas

Publicado

2023-02-24

Cómo citar

COUTO, G. ., VANDENBERGHE, L., & TAVARES, W. M. (2023). Interpersonal interactions within couples: Convergences and divergences between self-description and partner’s perception. Estudos De Psicologia, 35(3). Recuperado a partir de https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/estpsi/article/view/7464