Gene editing of the human embryo
tensions and controversies among scientists
Palabras clave:
Bioethics, Gene editing, Human embryo, Social representationResumen
Objective
This study analyzed the relation between the position of scientists on embryo editing and the different types of knowledge involved.
Method
A lexical analysis of 151 scientific articles in the PubMed and Web of Science databases was conducted using the IRAMUTEQ software.
Results
The results showed that gene editing in embryos is presented in two argumentative branches: the first refers to the editing technique and its possibilities; the second discusses the impacts of these techniques on the public arena. The results demonstrate a consensus regarding the potential of editing; however, dilemmas about its effectiveness were also highlighted.
Conclusion
The presence of ethical conflicts with embryo editing among the specialists was evidenced especially regarding the birth of genetically modified babies. Therefore, gene editing is marked by conflicts that are not limited only to biological contexts, but that encompasses different aspects of social life.
Descargas
Citas
Aléssio, R. L. D. S., Apostolidis, T., Santos, M. D. F. D. S., & Dany, L. (2011). Représentations sociales et embryon humain: une étude comparative Brésil/France. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 4, 371-395.
Aléssio, R. L. S., Apostolidis, T., & Santos, M. F. S. (2008). Entre o aborto e a imprensa. Psicologia Reflexão e Crítica, 21(3), 465-463.
Bardin, L. (1977). L’analyse de contenu. Presses Universitaires de France.
Baumann, M. (2016). CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing-new and old ethical issues arising from a revolutionary technology. Nano Ethics, 10(2), 139-159.
Cyranoski, D. (2019, May 20). China set to introduce gene-editing regulation following CRISPR-baby furore. Nature News. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01580-1
Gross, M. (2015). Bacterial scissors to edit human embryos? Current Biology, 25(11), 439-442.
Gumer, J. M. (2019). The wisdom of germline editing: an ethical analysis of the use of CRISPR-Cas9 to edit human embryos. The New Bioethics, 25(2), 137-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.05.027.
Hammerstein, A. L. V., Eggel, M., & Biller-Andorno, N. (2019). Is selecting better than modifying? An investigation of arguments against germline gene editing as compared to preimplantation genetic diagnosis. BMC Medical Ethics, 20(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0411-9
Kalampalikis, N., & Apostolidis, T. (2020). Challenges for social representations theory: the socio-genetic perspective. In S. Papastamou & P. Moliner (Dir.), Serge Moscovici’s work. Legacy and perspective. Éditions de la Méditerranée.
Karagyaur, M. N., Efimenko, A. Y., Makarevich, P. I., Vasiluev, P. A., Akopyan, Z. A., Bryzgalina, E. V., & Tkachuk, V. A. (2019). Ethical and legal aspects of using genome editing technologies in medicine. Modern Technologies in Medicine, 11(3), 117-133. http://doi.org/10.17691/stm2019.11.3.16
Lander, E. S., Baylis, F., Zhang, F., Charpentier, E., Berg, P., Bourgain, C., Friedrich, B., Joung, K. J., Li, J., Liu, D., Naldini, L., Nie, B. J., Qiu, R., Seifert, S. B., Shao, F., Terry, S., Wei, W., & Winnacker, L. E. (2019). Adopt a moratorium on heritable genome editing. Nature, 567, 165-168. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586- 019-00726-5
Lanphier, E., Urnov, F., Haecker, S. E., Werner, M., & Smolenski, J. (2015). Don’t edit the human germ line. Nature, 519(7544), 410-411. https://doi.org/10.1038/519410a
Le Coz, P. (2018). L’éthique médicale. Presses Universitaires de Provence.
Mohr, A., & Raman, S. (2012). Representing the public in public engagement: the case of the 2008 UK Stem Cell Dialogue. Plos Biology, 10(11), e1001418. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001418
Moscovici, S. (1961). La psychanalyse, son image et son public. PUF.
Moscovici, S. (1981). On social representations. Perspectives on everyday understanding. In J. Forgas (Ed.), Social Cognition (pp. 181-209). Academic Press.
Moscovici, S. (2012). Representações sociais. Investigações em psicologia social. Vozes.
Nogueira Furtado, R. (2019). Gene editing: the risks and benefits of modifying human DNA. Revista Bioetica, 27(2), 233-233. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-80422019272304.
Savulescu, J., Pugh, J., Douglas, T., & Gyngell, C. (2015). The moral imperative to continue gene editing research on human embryos. Protein and Cell, 6(7), 476-479.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Maria de Fátima de Souza SANTOS, Renan Harmes ESKINAZI, Thémis APOSTOLIDIS, Lionel DANY
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
