A compreensão da memória segundo diferentes perspectivas teóricas

Autores

  • Carmen Beatriz NEUFELD PUC-RS
  • Lilian Milnitsky STEIN PUC-RS

Palavras-chave:

Memória, Modelos de Memória, Psicologia Cognitiva

Resumo

O presente trabalho visa oferecer aos acadêmicos e profissionais da área uma revisão dos principais achados sobre a memória no último século. Apresentaremos, inicialmente, uma revisão histórica sobre o estudo da memória, trazendo os avanços mais significativos alcançados e a importância destes avanços para os estudos atuais nesta área. Serão abordados, igualmente, os principais modelos explicativos de memória, suas principais contribuições e limitações, desde o Modelo Espacial, passando pelo Modelo da Teoria dos Esquemas, o Modelo dos Dois Processos, o Modelo da Especificidade de Codificação, até o Modelo de Mandler e o Modelo da Teoria do Traço Difuso. Concluiremos o presente trabalho traçando um paralelo entre as diferentes teorias explicativas da memória, ressaltando suas contribuições e as principais perguntas que impulsionam a continuidade das pesquisas na área.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

ACREDOLO, C. (1995). Intuition and gist. Learning and Individual Differences, 7, 2, 83-86.

ALBA, J. W., & Hasher, L. (1983). Is memory schematic? Psychological Bulletin, 93, 201-231.

ANDERSON, J. R. (1995). Cognitive psychology and its implications. 4.ed. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.

ATKINSON, R. C. & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. Em K. Spence & J. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press.

BADDELEY, A. (2000). Short-term and working memory. Em Tulving, E. & Craik, F.I.M. (Orgs.) The Oxford Handbook of Memory (pp. 77-92). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

BADDELEY, A. D. (1982). Domains of recollection. Psychological Review, 89, 708-729.

BARTLETT, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. New York & London: Cambridge University Press.

BINET, A., & Henri, V. (1894a). La memoire des mots. L'Année Psychologique, 1, 1-23.

BINET, A., & Henri, V. (1894b). La memoire des phrases. L'Année Psychologique, 1, 24-59.

BJORKLUND, D. (1995). Na interim evaluation of Fuzzy-trace theory: Cautiousness, confirmation, and consciousness. Learning and Individual Differences, 7, 2, 99-110.

BOWER, G. H. (2000). A brief history of memory research. Em Tulving, E. & Craik, F.I.M. (Orgs.) The Oxford Handbook of Memory (pp. 3-32).Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

BRAINERD, C. J., & Kingma, J. (1984). Do children have to remember to reason? A fuzzy-trace theory of transitive development. Developmental Review, 4, 311-377.

BRAINERD, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (1989). Output-interference theory of dual-task deficits in memory development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 47, 1-18.

BRAINERD, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (1990). Gist is the grist: Fuzzy-trace theory and the new intuitionism. Developmental Review, 10, 3-47.

BRAINERD, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (1998). Fuzzy-trace theory and children's false memories: New frontiers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 71, 194-209.

BRAINERD, C. J., Reyna, V. F., & Kneer, R. (1995). False-recognition reversal: When similarity is distinctive. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 157-185.

BRAINERD, C. J., Reyna, V. F., & Mojardin, A. H. (1999). Conjoint recognition. Psychological Review, 106, 160-179.

BRAINERD, C. J., Stein, L. M., & Reyna, V. F. (1998). On the development of conscious and unconscious memory. Developmental Psychology, 34, 342-357.

BRUNSWIK, E., Goldscheider, L., & Pilek, E. (1932). Zur Systematik des Gedächtnisses. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für angewandte Psychologie, 64, 1-158.

CHI, M. T. H., & Glaser, R. (1992). A capacidade para a solução de problemas. Em: Sternberg, R. (Ed.). As capacidades intelectuais humanas - uma abordagem em processamento de informações. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas.

COONEY, J. B. (1995). Fuzzy-trace theory: A proposed test of individual differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 7, 2, 139-144.

EBBINGHAUS, H. (1885). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.

ELLIS, H. C. (1987). Recent developments of human memory. Em V. P. Makosky (Ed.) The G. Stanley Hall lecture series (Vol. 7). Washington, D.C.: A.P.A.

ELLIS, H. C., & Hunt, R. R. (1993). Fundamentals of cognitive psychology. 5.ed. Madison: Brown Benchmark.

EYSENCK, M. W., & Keane, M. T. (1994). Psicologia cognitiva: Um manual introdutório. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas.

ISTOMINA, Z. M. (1977). The development of voluntary memory in preschool-age children. Soviet Psychology, 13, 5-64.

JACOBY, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.

JACOBY, L. L., Toth, J. P., & Yonelinas, A. P. (1993). Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: Measuring recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 139-154.

JACOBY, L. L. (1996). Dissociating automatic and consciously controlled effects of study/ test compatibility. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 32-52.

JACOBY, L. L.,Begg, I. M., & Toth, J. P. (1997). In defence of independence: Violations of assumptions underlying the process dissociation procedure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33 (2), 484-496.

JONES, G. V. (1982). Tests of the dualmechanism theory of recall. Acta Psychologica, 50, 61-72.

KELLEY, C. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (2000). Recollection and familiarity: Processdissociation. Em Tulving, E. & Craik, F.I.M. (Orgs.) The Oxford Handbook of Memory (pp. 215 - 228). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

LOBSIEN, M. (1902). Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die Gedächtnisentwicklung bei Schulkindern. Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane, 27, 34-76.

MANDLER, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judment of previus occurrence. Psychological Review, 87, 252 -271.

MILLER, G. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.

NAVON, D. (1984). Resources - a theoretical soup stone? Psychological Review, 91, 216-234.

NETSCHAJEFF, A. (1900). Experimentelle Untersuchungen über Gedächtnisentwicklung bei Schulkindern. Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Phsyologie der Sinnesorgane, 24, 322 - 351.

POSNER, M. T. (1980). Cognição. Rio de Janeiro: Interamericana.

POZO, J. I. (1998). Formação de conceitos artificiais. Em: Teorias Cognitivas da Aprendizagem. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas.

RANSCHBURG, P. (1901). Apparat und Methode zur Untersuchung des optischen Gedächtnisses für medizinische und pädagogisch-psychologische Zwecke. Monatsschrift für Psychiatrie und Neurologie, 10, 17-51.

REYNA, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (1990). Fuzzy processing in transitivity development. Annals of Operations Research, 23, 37-63.

REYNA, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (1991). Fuzzytrace theory and children's acquisition of mathematical and scientific concepts. Learning and Individual Differences, 3,27 - 60.

REYNA, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (1992). Fuzzytrace theory of reasoning and remembering: paradoxes, patterns, and parallelisms. Em

A.F. Healy, S. M. Kosslyn & R. M. Shiffrin (Eds.), From learning theory to connectionist theory: Essays in honor of William K. Estes (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

REYNA, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (1995a). Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis. Learning andIndividual Differences, 7, 1 - 75.

REYNA, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (1995b). Fuzzy-trace theory: Some foundational issues. Learning and Individual Differences, 7, 2, 145-162.

REYNA, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (1998). Fuzzytrace theory and children's false memories: New frontiers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 71, 194-209.

REYNA, V. F., & Lloyd, F. (1997). Theories of false memories in children and adults. Learning and Individual Differences, 9, 95-123.

REYNA, V. F., & Titcomb, A. L. (1996). Constraints on the suggestibility of eyewitness testemony: A fuzzy-trace theory analysis. Em D. G. Payne & F. G. Conrad (Eds.), A synthesis of basic and applied approaches to human memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

RUNDUS, D., & Atkinson, R. C. (1970). Rehearsal processes in free recall: A procedure for direct observation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 99-105.

SCHNEIDER, W., & Pressley, M. (1997). Memory development: Between two and twenty. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.

SCHWARTZ, B., & Reisberg, D. (1991). Learning and Memory. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

STEIN, L. M. (1999). Falsas memórias em crianças brasileiras: Um estudo experimental pioneiro. Projeto do Grupo de Pesquisa em Processos Cognitivos, Porto Alegre, PUCRS.

STERNBERG, R. J. (2000). Psicologia Cognitiva. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas.

TULVING, E. (1982). Synergidtic ecphory in recall and recognition. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 130-147.

TULVING, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

TULVING, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1971). Retrieval processes in recognition memory: Effects of associative context. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 87, 116 - 124.

VERTES, J. O. (1913). Das Wortgedächtnis im Schulkindesalter. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 63, 19 - 128.

WARRINGTON, E. K. & Shallice, T. (1972). Neuropsychological evidence of visual storage in short-term memory task.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 24, 30 - 40.

WERNER, H. (1948). Comparative psychology of mental development. New York: International Universities Press.

ZIMMERMAN, B. J. (1995). Enhancing intuitive reasining: A case for Higher cognitive processes. Learning and Individual Differences, 7, 2, 115 - 118.

ZINCHENKO, P. I. (1967). Probleme der Gedächtnispsychologie. Em H. Hiebsch (Ed.), Ergebnisse der sowjetischen Psychologie. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

Downloads

Publicado

2001-08-31

Como Citar

NEUFELD, C. B. ., & STEIN, . L. M. . (2001). A compreensão da memória segundo diferentes perspectivas teóricas. Estudos De Psicologia, 18(2). Recuperado de https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/estpsi/article/view/6618