On Readers and Text: Tracking the Routes of Cultural Studies
Resumo
The purpose of this paper is to present cultural as an international phenomenon by way of comparing and contrasting the work being done in the United States, Europe, and Latin America.
Referências
ADORNO, T. & Horkheimer, M. (1972). Dialectic of Enlightenment, New York: Herder and Herder.
ALLEN, R. C. (1987). Reader-Oriented Criticism and Television. ln R.C. Allen (Ed.). Channels of Discourse (pp. 74-112). Chapei Hill: The University of Nor_th Carolina Press.
ALLOR, M. (1988). Relocating lhe Site of the Audience. ln Criticai Studies in Mass Communication, 5 (3), 217-233.
ALTHUSSER, L. (1971 ). Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays (Ben Brewster, Trans.). London: New Left Books.
ALTMAN, C. F. (1985). Psychoanalysis and Cinema: The lmaginary Discourse. In 8. Nichols (Ed.), Movies and Methods. Vol. 2 (pp. 517-531). Berkeley: University of California Press.
ANG, 1. (1991 ). Desperate Séeking the Audience. New York Routledge.
ANG, 1. (1990). The Nature of the Audience. ln J. Downing a àl. (Eds.). Ouestioning the Media (pp. 155-1 65). Newbury Park: Sage:
ANG; 1. ( 1988): (Not) Coming to Terms with Dallas. ln C. Schnelder and B. Wallis (Eds.), Global Television (pp. 69-77). New York: Wedge Press.
ATWOOD, R. (1986). Assessing Crilical Mass Communication Scholarship in the Americas: The Relationship of Theory and Practice. ln R. Atwood and E. G. McAnany (Eds.), Communication and Latin Amencan Society; Trends in Criticai Research. 1960-1985 (pp. 11-27). Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
BARRETT, M. (1985). ldeology and the Production of Gender. ln J.Newton and D. Rosenfelt (Eds.), Feminist Criticism and Social Change (pp. 65-85). New York: Methuen.
BARTHES, R ( 1977). The death of the author, in lmage-music-text (Stephen Heath, Trans.). New York Hill and Wang.
BAUDRILLARD, J. (1983). ln the Shadow of the Silent Majorities or. The End of the Social and Other Essays. London: Comedia.
BENNETT, T. & Woolacott, J. (1987). Bond and Beyond: The Political Career of a Popular Hero. New York: Methuen.
BENNETT, T. (1986a). lntroduction: Popular Culture and 'the turn' to Gramsci. ln T. Bennett C. Mercer & J. Woolacott (Eds.), Popular Culture and Social Relations (pp.xi-xix). Oxford: Open University Press.
BENNETT, T. (1986b). The polilics of 'the popular' and popular culture. ln T. Élennett, C. Mercer & J. Woolacott (Eds.), Popular Culture and Social Relations (pp. 6-21). Oxford. Open University Press.
BLAU, H. (1990). The Audiece. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
BORWELL, D., Staiger, J. & Thompson, K. (1985). The Classical Hollywood Cinema: Film Style and Mode of Production to 1960. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
BOURDIEU, P. (1991). DidYou SayPopular?, in Appendix of J. B. Thompson (Ed.), Language and Symbolic Power (G. Raymond and Matlhew Adamson, trans.), pp. 90-102. Cambridge, England: Polily Press.
BOURDIEU, P. (1990). ln Other Words: Essays Towards a Reflexive Sociology (Matthew Adamson, Trans.). Stanford. Stanford University Press.
BOURDIEU, P. (1987). Outline of a Theory of Pratice (Richard Nice, Trans.). New York: Cambridge Studies in Social Anthropology.
BOURDIEU, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Çritique of the Juqgment of Taste (Richard Nice. Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
BOSI, E. (1986). Cultura de Massa e Cultura Popular: Leitura de Operárias [Mass Cullure and Popular Culture: Female workers' readings] (16th ed.). Petrópolis: Editora Vozes.
BRENNAN, T. (1988, Oct 29). Lesson in Hegemony: the Struggle for Culture or What the Third World is Teaching the Metropolis About Culture Studies. Paper presented at the American Studies Convention, Miami Beach, FL.
BUDD, M., Entman, R. M. & Steinman, C. (1990). The Affirmative Character of U.S. Cultural Studies. ln Criticai Studies in Mass Communication, 7 (2): 169-184.
BURTON, J. (1985). Marginal Cinemas and Mainstream Critical Theory. ln Screen, 26 (3-4), 2-21.
BUSCOMBE, E. (1986). ldeas of Authorship. ln J. Caughie (ed.), Theories of Authorhip (pp. 22-33). New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
CANTOR, M. G. & Cantor, M. J. (1986a). Audience Composition and Television Content: The Mass Audience Revisited. ln S. J. Ball-Rokeach and M. G. Cantor (Eds.). Media, Audience, and Social Structure (pp. 214-225). Newbury Park: Sage.
CANTOR, M. G. & Cantor, J. M. (1986b). American Television in the lnternational Marketplace. ln Communication Research. 13 (3), 509-520.
CARRAGEE, K. M. ( 1990). lnterpretive Media Study and lnterpretive Social Science. ln Criticai Studies in Mass Communication, 7 (2): 81-96.
CAREY, J. (1989). Communication as Culture: Essays on Media and Society. Winchester, MA: Unwin Hyrnan, lnc.
CARROLL, N. (1988). Mystifying Movies: Fads and Fallacies in Contemporary Film Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
CHAMBERS, I. (1986). Popular Culture: The Metropolitan Experience. New York: Methuen.
CHAUÍ, M. (1986). Conformismo e Resistência: aspectos da cultura popular no Brasil [Conformism and Resistance: aspects of popular culture in Blazil]. São Paulo: editra brasiliense.
COLLINS, J. (1989). Uncommon Cultures: Popular Culture and Post-Modernism. New York: Routledge.
COLLINS, R. (1988). Wall-to-Wall Dallas: The U.S. - U. K. Trade in Televisión. ln C. Schneiner and B. Wallis (Eds.), Global Television (pp. 79-93). New York: Wedge Press.
CONDIT, C. M. (1989). The Rethorical Limits of Polysemy. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 6 (2), 103-122.
DAYAN, D. (1976). The Tutor-Code of Classical Cinema. ln B. Nichols (Ed.), Movies and Methods, Vol. 1 (pp. 438-451 ). Berkeley: University of Califonia Press.
DE CERTEAU, M. (1990, Fali). On The Opposilional Practices of Everday life. Social Text. 1 (3). 3-43.
DE LAURETIS, T. (1987). Technologies of Gender: Essays on Theory. Film. and Fiction. Bloomington: Indiana Universit Press.
DEMING, R. H. (1985). The Television Spectator-Subject. ln Journal of Film and Vídeo, 37 (3). 48-63.
DORFMAN, A. (1983). The Empire Old Clothes. New York: Pantheon Books.
DORFMAN, A. & Mattelart, A. (1987). The Great Parachutist. ln D. Lazere (Ed.), American Media and Mass Culture: Left Perspectives (pp. 530-539). Berkeley: University of California Press.
DORFMAN, A. & Mattelart, A. (1983). para leer el pato donald (24th ed.). Mexico City: siglo veintiuno editores.
DYER, R. (1986). Heavenlv Bodies: Film Stars and Society. New York: St. Martin's Press.
EVANS, W. A. (1990). The lnterpretative Turn in Media Research: lnnovation, lteration, or lllusion? ln Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7(2): 147-168.
FEJES, F. (1986a). lmperialism. Media. and The Good Neighbor. Norwood. Ablex.
FEJES, F. (1986b). State and Communication Policy in Latin America. ln Criticai Studies in Mass Communication. 3(2): 246-251.
FEJES, F. (1983). The U.S. in Third World Communications: Latina America, 1900-1945. ln Journalism Monographs, 86: 1-29.
FESTA, R. & Lins da Silva, C. E. (1986). Comunicação Popular e itemativa no Brasil [Popular and Alternative Communication in brazil]. São Paulo: Edições Paulinas.
FISKE, '. (1991 ). Moments of television: Neither the text nor the audience. ln Ellen Seiter et ai., Remote Control: Television. Jludiences & Cultural Power (pp. 56-78). New York Routledge.
FISKE, J. (1989). Understanding Popular Culture. Wellington: Unwin Hyman.
FISKE, . (1988). Meaningful Moments. ln Criticai Studies in Mass Communication. 5 (3): 246-250.
FISKE, J. (1987a). Television Culture. New York: Methuen.
FISKE, J. (1987b). British Cultural Studies and Television. ln R. C. Allen (Ed.), Channels of Discourse (pp. 254-289). Chapel; Mill: University of North Carolina Press.
FISKE, J. & Hartley, J. (1982). Reading Television. New York: Methuen.
FOUCAULT, M. (1984). What is an Author? ln Paul Rabinow (Ed), The, Foucault Reader (pp. 101-120). New York: Pantheon Books.
FOUCAULT, M. ( 1982). The Subject and Power, in H. Dreyfuss and P. Rabinow (Eds.}, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics (pp. 208-226). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
FRANKLIN, S. et ai. (1991 ). Off-Centre-Feminism and Cultural Studies. New York: Harper-Collins-Academic.
GABRIEL, T. H. (1989a). Towards a criticai theory of Third World Films. ln J. Pines & P. Willemen (Eds.). Ouestions of Third Cinema (pp. 30-52). London: British Film lnstitute.
GABRIEL, T. H. (1989bl. Third Cinema as Guardian of Popular GABRIEL, T. H. (1989bl. Third Cinema as Guardian of Popular Memory: Towards a Thirds Aesthetics. ln J. Pines & P. Willemen (Eds.). Questions of Third Cinema (pp. 53-64). London: British film lnstitute.
GARCÍA Canclini, N. (1988). Culture and power the state of research. ln Media. Culture and Society. 10: 467-497.
GARCÍA Canclini, N. (1987). Ni Folkdorico Ni Masivo: Que Es Lo Popular? [Meither Folkcloric nor Massive: What is the Popular?]. ln Dia-logos de la Comunicación, 17: 3-7.
GILLES, D. (1985, Summer). Television Reception. ln Journal of Film and Vídeo, 37 (3), 12-25.
GIROUX, H. A. & Simon, R. 1. (1989). Popular Culture, Schoooling, and Everyday Life. Granby, MA: Bergin & Garvey.
GONZÁLEZ, J. (1980) Dominación cultural: expressíon artística-promocion popular. Mexico City: Centro de Estudios Ecumênicos.
GONZÁLEZ, J. (1987). Los frentes culturales: culturas, mapas, poderes y luchas por las definiciones legitimas de los sentidos sociales de 1 ª vida ln Estudios sobre las culturas contemporaneas, 1 (3), 5-44.
GRIPSRUD, J. (1989). 'High Culture' Revisited. ln Cultural Studies 3(2), 194-207.
GROSSBERG, L. ( 1989). The Circulation of Cultural Studies. ln Critical Studies ln mass Comunication, 6(4): 413-421.
GROSSBERG, L. ( 1984). Strategies of Marxist Cultural lntapretations. ln Criticai Studies in Mass Communication. 1: 392-421.
GROSSBERG, L., Nelson, C. & Treichler, P. A. (Eds.). (1992). Cultural Studies. New York. Routledge.
GROSSBERG, L., Treichler, P. A. (1987). lnterseclions of power Criticism, television, gender. Comunication 9(1), 93-1 23.
HALL, S. (1992). Cultural Studies and its Theoretical Legacies. ln L. Grosseberg, C. Nelson, and P. Treichler (Eds.l, Cultural Studies (pp. 277-294). New York: Routledge.
HALL, S. ( 1990). The emergence of cullural studies and the crisis of the humanities. ln October. 53: 28-31.
HALL, S. (1986a). Cultural Studies: Two Paradigmis. ln R. Collins, J. Curran et ai (Eds.). Media, Culture & Society (pp. 33-48). Newbury Park: Sage.
HALL, S. ( 1 986b). Cultural Stuties and the Centre: some problematics and problems. ln S. Hall et ai. (Eds.) Culture, media & language (pp. 15-47). London: Hutchinson.
HALL, S. (1986c). Encoding/Decoding. ln S. Hall et ai. (Eds.), Culture, media & language (pp. 128-138). London: Hutclinson.
HALL, S. (1982). The redescovery of 'ideology': return of the repressed in media studia. ln M. Gurevitch, T. Bennettu, Curran J. & J. Woolacott (Eds.). Culture, Society and the Media (pp. 56-90). New York: Melhuen.
HALL, S. (1981). Notes on Deconstructing The Popular'. ln R. Samuel (Ed.), People's History and Socialist Theory (pp.
-241). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
HALL, S. (1979). Cullure, the Media and the 'ldeological Effect'. ln J. Curran et ai (Eds.). Mass Communication Society (pp. 315-348). Bervely Hills: Sage.
HARTLEY, J. (1992). Tele-ology Studies in Television. New York. Routledge.
HARTLEY, J. ( 1988). The Real World of Audiences. Criticai Studies in Mass Communication, 5(3): 234-238.
HEATH, S. (1986). Comment on The idea of authorship'. ln J. Caughie (Ed.l, Theories of Authorship (pp. 214-220). New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
HEBDIGE, D. (1985). From Culture to Hegemony, in Subculture: The meaning of Style (pp. 5-19). New York: Methuen.
IANNI, O. (1976). Imperialismo and Culturel [lmperialism and Culture). (2nd. ed.). Petrópolis. Vozes.
JENSEN, K. B. (1988). Answering The Ouestion: What Is Reception Analysis? ln Nordic Review, incompl. reference.
JENSEN, K. B. (1987). Oualitative Audience Research Toward an lntegrative Approach to Reception. ln Criticai Studies in Mass Communication, 4:21-36.
JONHSON, R. (Wintter, 1986-87). What is Cultural Studies Anyway? ln Social Text, 16: 38-80.
KELLNER, D. (1982). TV, ldeology, and Emancipatoly Popular Culture. ln H. Newcomb (Ed) (3rd ed.). Television: The Criticai View (pp. 386-421). New, York: Oxford University Press.
KLINGER, B. (1988). ln Retrospect Film Studies Today. ln The Yale Journal of Criticism, 2 (1), 129-151.
KUBEY, R. & Csikczentmihalyi M. (1990). Television and the Oualiq of Life: How Viewing Shapes Everyday Experience. Hillsdale Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
KUHN, A. & Radstone, S. (1990). Women in Film: An lnternational Guide. New York: Fawcett Columbine.
KUHN, A. ( 1985). The Power of lmage: Essays on Representation and Sexuality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
KUHN, A. (1984, Jan.-Feb.). Women's Genres. ln Screen. 25 (1), 19-28.
LEAL, O. F. (1990, Jan.). PopularTaste and Erudite Repertoire: The Place and Space of Television in Brazil. ln Cultural Studies. 4 (1), 19-29.
LEAL, O. F. (1986). A Leitura Social da Novela das Oito [The Social Reading of the 8.00 PM Soap Opera]. Petrópolis: Vozes. narrative: the case of the Brazilian "Novela Summer Sun." ln Theory, Culture and Society, 5: 81-99.
LEE, C.-C. ( 1979). Media lmperialism Reconsidered: The Homogenizing of Television Culture. Beverly Hills: Sage Publicat.ions.
LEMBO, R. & Tucker, Jr., K. H. (1990). Cultule, Television, and Opposition: Rethinking Cultural Studies. ln Criticai Studies in Mass Communication. 7. (2), 97-116.
UEBES, T. & Katz, E. (n.d.) On the Convergence of Theories of Mass Communication and Literature Regarding the Role of the 'Reader'. Typewritten manuscripit.
LINS da Silva, C. E. (1986). Trasnational Communication and Culture. ln R. Atwood & E. G. McAnany (Eds.), Communication and Latin American Society: Trends in Criticai Research. 1960-1985 (pp. 89-111). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
LINS da Silva, C. E. ( 1985). Muito Além do Jardim Botânico: Um estudo sobre a audiência do Jornal Nacional da Globo entre trabalhadores [Beyond the Botanic Garden: A Study of working class readings of TV Globo' s prime-time evening news]. São Paulo: Summus Editorial Ltda.
LINS da Silva, C. E. (Ed.). (1982). Comunicação, hegemonia e Contra-informação [Communication, hegemony and anti-information]. São Paulo: Cortez Editora.
LONG, E. ( 1989). Ferninism and Cultural Studies. ln Criticai Studies in Mass Communication, 6(4): 427-435.
LÓPEZ, A. (1991 ). The Melodrama in Latin America: Films, Telenovelas, and the Currency of a Popular Form. ln M. Landy (Ed.), _lmitations of Life: a reader on Film & Television Melodrama (pp. 596-606). Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
LULL, J. (1988). The Audience as Nuisance. ln Criticai Studies in Mass Communication. 5 (3), 239-243.
MACCABE, C. (Ed.). (1986) High Theory/Low Culture: Analysing popular television and film. Manchester, England. Manchester University Press.
MACCABE, C. (1985). Tracking the Signifier. Minneapolis. University of Minnesota Press.
MACHADO, A., Magri, C. & Masagão, M. (1987). Rádio Livres: a reforma agrária no ar [Free Radios: agrarian reform through the wavesl (2nd. ed.). São Paulo: editora blasiliense.
MAGNANI, J. G. (1984). Festa no Pedaço: Cultura Popular e Lazer na Cidade [Local Party: Urban Popular Culture and Leisure]. São Paulo: editora brasiliense.
MARQUES de Mello, J. (1988). As Telenovelas da Globo: Produção e Exportação [Globo's Telenovelas: Production and Export]. São Paulo: summus editorial.
MARTÍN-BARBERO, J. (1988). Communication from culture: crisis of the national and the emergence of the popular. ln Media. Culture and Society, 10: 447-465.
MARTÍN-BARBERO, J. (1987). De los medias a las mediaciones [From media to mediatoins]. Mexico: Ediciones G. Gili.
MARTÍN-BARBERO, J. (1983). Memoria narrativa e industria cultural [Narrative memory and cultural industry]. ln Communicación y cultura [Communication and Culture], 10: 59-73.
MATTELART, A., Delcourt, X. & Mattelart, M. (1984). lnternational lmage Markets. London: Comedia.
MATTELART, A. (1990). Carnival of lmages; Brazilian Television Fiction (David Buxton, Trans.}. New York: Bergin and Garvey.
MCANANY, E. G. (1986). Cultural Industries in' lnternational Perspective: Convergence of Conflict? ln B. Dervin and Melvin J. Voigt (Eds.), Progress in Communication Sciences, Vol. VII (pp. 1-29). Norwood. Ablex Publishing Co.
MCANANY, E. G. (1989). Television and Cultural Discourses: Latin American and United States Comparisons. ln Studies in Latin American Popular Culture, 8, 1-21.
MCROBBIE, A. (1991. Spring}. New Times in Cultural Studies. ln New Formations, 13: 1-15.
MCROBBIE, A. (1985). Setting accounts with subcultures a feminist critique. ln T. Bennett et ai. (Eds.), Culture, ldeology and Social Process: A Reader (pp. 111-127). London: The Open University Press.
MERCER, C. (1991, Spring). Neverending Stories: The Problem of Reading in Cultural Studies. ln New Formations, 13, 63-74.
METZ, C. (1982). The imaginary signifier. (Ben Brewster, Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
MILLER, N. K. (1986). Changing the Subject Authrship, Writing, and the Reader. ln Tereza de Lauretis (Ed.), Feminist Studies/Critical Studies (pp. 102-120). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
MILLS, P. (1985). An lnternational Audience? ln Media, Culture and Society, 17: 487-501.
MODLESKI, T .. ( 1986). Studies in Entertainment: Critical Approaches to Mass Culture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
MODLESKI, T. (1982). Loving with a Vengeance: Mass-produced fantasies for women. New York: Methuen.
MOORES, S. (1990, Jan.). Texts, readers and contexts of reading: developments in the study of media audiences. ln Media, Culture and Society, 12 (1), 9-29.
MORLEY, D. (1986). Texts, readers, subjects. ln S. Hall et ai (Eds.), Culture, Media and Language (pp. 163-173). London: Hutchinson/Centre for Contemporary Studies.
MORAIS, M. (1990). Banality in Cultural Studies. ln P. Mellencamp (Ed.), Logics of Television: Essays in Cutural Criticism (pp.
-43). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
MUKERJI, C. & Schudson, M. (Eds.). (1991 ). Rethinking Popular Culture: Contemporary Perspectives in Cultural Studies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
MULVEY, L. (1989). Visual and Other Pleasures. Bloomington: Indiana -University Press.
MURDOCK, G. (1989). Cultural Studies: Missing Links. ln Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 6(4): 436-440.
NEWCOMB, H. M. & Hirsch, P. M. (1984). Televisionas Cultural Forum. ln W. D. Rowland, Jr. & B. Watkins (Eds.), lnterpretng Telivision: Current Research Perspectives (pp. 58-73). Beverly Hills: Sage.
NORDENSTRENG, I<. & Varis, T. (1974). Telivision Traffic: A One-Way Street? Reports and Papers on Mass Communication #70. Paris: The UNESCO Press.
O'CONNOR, A. (1991 ). The Emergence of Cultural Studies in Latin America. ln Criticai Studies in Mass Communication, 8(1), 60-73.
O'CONNOR, A. (1989). The Problem of American Cultural Studies. ln Criticai Studies in Mass Communication, 6(4), 405-413.
O'CONNOR, A. (n.d.). What is Transnational Cultural Studies? Typewritten manuscript.
OLIVEIRA, O. S. (n.d.a.). Dança da Mídia em Belíndia: Sedução do Moderno em Baile de Dependência.Typewritten manuscript .
OLIVEIRA, O. S. (n.d.b). Brazilian Soap Outshine Hollywood: Is Cultural lmperialism Fading Out? Typewritten manuscript.
OLIVEIRA, O. S. (1991 a). Genocídio Cultural [Cultural Genocide]. São Paulo: Edições Paulinas.
OLIVEIRA, O. S. (1991 b). Mass Media, Culture, and Communication in Brazil: The Heritage of Dependency. ln G. sussçnan & J. A. Lent (Eds.), Transnational Communications: Wiring the Third World (pp. 200-213). Newbury Park: Sage.
ORTIZ, R. et ai. (1988). Telenovela: História e Produção [Telenovela: History and Production]. São Paulo: editora brasiliense.
O'SHEA, A. (1989). Television as culture: not just texts and readers. ln Media Culture and Society. 11: 373-379.
PARTINGTON, A. (1991). Melodrana's genderod audience. ln S. Franklin, C. Lury & J. Stacey (Eds.), Off-Centre: Feminism and Cultural Studies (pp.49-68). New York: HaperCollinsAcademic.
PRESS, A. L. (1991). Women Watching Television: Gender. Class. and Generation in the American Television Experience. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
PRESS, A. (1989). Class and gender in the hegemonic process: class diferences in women's perceptions of television realism and identification with television characters. ln Media Culture and Sociely, 11 (2), 229-251.
PRESS, A. L. (1986). ldeologies of Femininity: Film and Popular Consciousness. ln S. J. Ball-Rokeach and M. Cantor (Eds.), Media, Audience, an Social Structure (pp. 313-323). Newbury Park: Sage.
RADWAY, J. (1991 ). lnterpretive Communities and Variable Literacies: The Functions of Romance Reading. ln C. Mukerji & M. Schudson (Eds.), Rethinking Popular Culture: Contemporary Perspectives in Cultural Studies (pp. 465-486). Berkeley: University of California Press.
RADWAY, J. (1986). ldentifying ideological seams: Mass culture, analytical method, and political practice. ln Communication. 9 (1), 93-123.
RADWAY, J. (1984). Reading the Romance. Chapei Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
RAKOW, L. (1990). Feminist Perspectives on Popular Culture. ln J.Downing et ai. (Eds.). Questioning the Media. Newbury Park Sage.
RAKOW, L. ( 1986). Feminist approaches to popular culture: Giving patriarchy its due. ln Communication. 9 (1), 19-41.
RAMOS, R. (1986). Grã-finos da Globo: cultura e merchandising nas novelas. Petrópolis: Vozes.
REAL, M. R. (1989). Cultural Studies as Metadiscipline, in Super Media: A Cultural Studies Approach (pp. 43-79). Newbury Park. Sage.
RÊGO, C. M. (1990, April 19). Photonovels in Latin America: Just a Toai for Social Conformity? Paper presented at the conference on Translating Latin America: An lnterdisciplinary Conference on Culture as Text. State University of New York at Binghamton, New York.
RIBEIRO Júnior, J. C. N. (1982). A Festa do Povo: Pedagogia de Resistência [The People's Party: Pedagogy of Resistance]. Petrópolis: Editora Vozes.
ROSS, A. (1989). No Respect: lntellectuals and Popular Culture: New York: Routledge.
ROTHMAN, W. ( 1976). Against 'The System ot the Suture'. ln B. Nichols (Ed.), Movies and Methods, Vai. 1 (pp. 451-459). Berkeley: University of California Press.
RYAN, M. & Kellner, D. (1988). Camera Politica: The Politics and ldeology of Contemporary Hollywood Film. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
SALINAS, R. & Paldán, L. (1979). Culture in the Process of Dependent Development: Theoretical Perspectives. ln N. Nordenstreng & H. Schiller (Eds.), National sovereignty and lnternational Communication (pp. 82-98). Norwood: Ablex.
SARTI, 1. ( 1981). Communication and Cultutal Dependency: A Misconception. ln E. G. McAnany, J. Schnitman & N. Janus (Eds.), Communication and Social'Structure: Criticai Studies in Mass Media Research (pp. 317-334). New York: Praeger.
SCHILLER, H. 1. (1991 ). Not Yet the Post-lmperialist Era. ln Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 8 ( 1 ), 13-28.
SCHILLER, H. 1. (1971 ). Mass Communications and American Empire. Boston: Beacon Press.
SCHUDSON, M. (1987). The New Validation of Popular Culture: Sense and Sentimentality in Academia. ln Criticai Studies in Mass Communication, 4, 51-68.
SCHWARZ, C. & Jaramillo, O. (1986). Hispanic American Critical Communication Research in lts Historical Context ln R. Atwood E.G. McAnany (Eds.). Communication and Latin American Society: Trends in Criticai Research, 1960-1985 (pp. 48-75). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
SEITER, E., Borchers, H. et ai. (1991 ). ln lntroduction to E. Seiter el al. (Eds.), Remote Control: Television, Audinces & Cultural Power (pp. 1-15). New York Routledge.
SHOLLE, D. J. (1988). Criticai Studies. From the Theory of ldeology to Power/Knowledge. ln Criticai Studies in Mass Communication, 5(1 ): 16-41.
SILVERMAN, K. (1986). Suture (excerpts). ln P. Rosen (Ed.), Narrative, Apparatus, ldeology: .A Film Theory Reader (pp 219-235). New York: Columbia· University Press.
SIMPSON Grinbeg, M. (Ed.) ( 1987). A Comunicação Alternativa na América Latina [Alternative Communication in Latin America]. Petrópolis. Vozes.
SIMPSON Grinberg, M. (1986). Trends in Altenative Communication Research in Latin America. ln R. Atwood & E. G. McAnany (Eds.), Communication and Latin American Society: Trends in Criticai Research, 1960-1985 (pp. 165-189). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
SMITH, P. (1988). Discerning the Subject. Minneapolis: Univesity of Minnesota Press.
STOTZ, E. N., Moreira, S. V. et ai. (1986). 20 anos de resistência alternativas da cultura no regime militar [20 years of resistance: cultural alternatives during the military regime). Rio de Janeiro: Espaço e Tempo.
STEEVES, H. L. (1987). Feminist Theories and Media Studies. ln Criticai Studies in Mass Communication, 4 (2), 95-135.
STRAUBHAAR, J. D. (1991). Beyond Media lmperialism: Assymetrical lnterdependence and Cultural Proximity. ln Criticai Studies in Mass Communication, 8 (1): 39-59.
STRAUBHAAR, J. D. (1984). Brazilian Television: The Decline of American lnfluence. ln Communication Research, 11 (2): 221-240.
THOMPSON, E. P. (1978). The Poverty of Theory and Other Essays. London: Merlin Press.
THOMPSON, E. P. (1968). The Making of the English Working Class. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
THOMPSON, E. P. (1961 a & b). Review of Raymond Williams' The Long Revolution'. ln New Left Review, May-June and July-August, pp. 24-33, 34-39.
THOMPSON, G. (1979). Television as Text Open University 'Case Study' Programmes. ln M. Barrett, P. Corrigan, A. Kuhn and J. Wolff (Eds.). ldeology and Cultural Production (pp.160-197). New York: St. Martin's Press.
THURSTON, C. (1987). The Romance Revolution. Ur bana: University of Illinois Press.
TOMASULO, F. P. (1988). The Text-ln-The-Spectator: The Role of Phenomenology ln An Eclectic Theoretical Methodology. ln Journal of Film and Vídeo. 40 (2), 20-32.
TUNSTALL, J. (1987). Media lmperialism? ln D. Lazere (Ed.), American Media and Mass Culture: Left Perspectives (pp.
-551). Berkeley: University of California Press.
TUNSTALL, J. (1977). The Media are American. New York Columbia University Press
TURNER, G. (1988). Filmas Social Practice. New York: Routledge.
VARIS, T. (1988). Trends in lnternational Television Flow. ln C. Schneider and 8. Wallis (Eds. ), Global Television (pp. 95-107). New York: Wedge Press.
VARIS, T. (1984, Winter). The lnternational Flow of Television Programs. ln Journal of Cornniunication. 34 (1), 143-152.
VINIK, N. (1988). The Telenovela and Ernancipation: A Study on TV and Social Change in Brazil. The Netherlands: Royal Tropical lnstitute.
WALDMAN, D. (1989). Film Theory and the Gendered Spectator: The Female or Feminist Reader? ln Camera Obscura, 18: 80-94.
WELLS, A. ( 1972). Picture Tube lmperialisrn? Maryknoll: Orbis Books.
WILLIAMS, R. (1989). The Future of Cultural Studies, in The Politics of Modernisrn: Against the New Conforrnists (pp.
-162). New York: Verso.
WILLIAMS, R. (1981 ). Culture. London: Fontana.
WILLIAMS, R. (1977). Marxisrn and Literature. New York: Oxford University Press.
WILLIAMS, R. (1965). The Long Revolution. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
WILLIAMSON, D. (1989). AUTHORSHIP and criticism. New South Wales, Australia: Local Consumption Publications.
WHITE, R. A. (1989). The Latin Arnerican Contribuition to Cornrnunication Theory [Typewritten rnanuscriptl. Roma. ltalia: Centro lnterdiscipinare sulla, Comunicazione Sociale!
WOLLEN, P. ( 1972). The auteur theory, in Signs and Meaning in the Cinema (3rd ed.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
WOOLACOTT, J. ( 1982). Messages and meanings. ln M. Gurevitch, T. Bennett. J. Curran & J. Woolacott (Eds.) Culture, Society and The Media (pp. 91-111 ). New York: Methuen.
WOLFF, J. (1984). The Death of the Author, in The Social Production of Art. New York: New York Universit Press.
ZAVARZADEH, M. (1991). Seeing Films Politically. Albany: State University of New York Press.
