Copper filter for dental radiography: revaluation of radiographic contrast
Palabras clave:
aluminum, copper, filtration, X-raysResumen
Objective
To study the effects of alternative copper filtration in a dental X-ray machine and evaluate possible changes in radiographic contrast.
Methods
An aluminum step-wedge was radiographed using aluminum (1.5mm) and copper (0.1mm) filters. Physical radiation factors (exposure time, kilovoltage and air-kerma rate) were controlled. After processing, the densitometer readings of the step-wedge step images were measured. For each radiograph, optical density and contrast curves were determined. The values of the areas under the contrast curves for the two groups (aluminum and copper filters) were compareci by the two-tailed Mann-Whitney test, with a levei of significance of O.OS.
Results
The mean areas under the contrast curves were -1.956 and -2.115 for the aluminum and copper filters respectively. According to the statistical test, these values were significantly different: copper filtration yielded better contrast.
Conclusion
The use of copper filter requires longer exposure times; it reduces the air-kerma rate and results in higher contrast values than those obtained with aluminum filter.
Descargas
Citas
Gelskey DE, Baker CG. Energy-selective filtration of dental X-ray beams. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1981; 52(5):565-7.
Horner K, Lawinski CP, Smith NJD. Erbium filtration for dose reduction in dental radiography. Br J Radiol. 1988; 61(727):609-12.
Kohn ML, Gooch AW, Keller WS. Filters for radiation reduction: a comparison. Radiol. 1988; 167(1): 255-7.
Shibuya H, Nishikawa K, Kuroyanagi K. Effect of K-shell absorption edge filters on image quality in digital
intraoral radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radio Endod. 2000; 90(3):377-84.
Haiter CFS, Bóscolo FN, Haiter Neto F, Almeida SM. Estudo da liga de alumínio-zinco como filtração alternativa em aparelhos de raios X odontológicos. Pesq Odontol Bras. 2002; 16(1):77-82.
Rubira MJ. Filtração da radiação X: uso do cobre no estudo do contraste radiográfico e diagnóstico da cárie dentária [dissertação]. Ribeirão Preto: Univer sidade de São Paulo; 2002.
Devito KL. Filtração da radiação X: uso do estanho na avaliação da qualidade da imagem radiográfica [tese]. Piracicaba: Universidade Estadual de Campinas; 2004.
MacDonald JCF, Reid JA, Luke M. The spectral sensitivity of dental X-ray films. Dentomaxillofac Radio!. 1987; 16(1):29-32.
Trout DE, Kelly JP, Cathey GA. The use of filters to contrai radiation exposure to the patient in diagnostic roentgenology. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1952; 67(1):946-62.
O. Cho T, Uehara S, Yoshimura A, Yoshinaga H. Dental X-ray spectrometry with na Si(Li) semicondutor. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1978; 45(6):965-77.
Ponce AZ, McDavid WD, Langland OE. The use of added erbium filtration in intraoral radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1988; 66(4):513-7.
Cordt 1, Engelke W. Sind zusatzfilter aus niobium in der zahanarstlichen radiologie dem kupferfilter überlegen? Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 1990; 100(10):1160-3.
Jangland L, Axelsson B. Niobium filters for dose reduction in pediatric radiology. Acta Radial. 1990; 31(5):540-1.
Tamburus JR. Estudo laboratorial e clínico dos efeitos da associação colimador/sensibilidade do filme sobre a dose de exposição à radiação e sobre a qualidade da imagem radiográfica [tese]. Ribeirão Preto: Universidade de São Paulo; 1991.
McDonnell D, Price C. Effects of niobium filtration and constant potential on the attenuation of dental X-ray beams by water. Dentomaxillofac Radio!. 1991; 20(2):77-80.
Watanabe PCA. Filtração adicional da radiação X em Odontologia. Estudo comparativo entre filtros de alumínio e cobre [tese]. Ribeirão Preto: Universidade de São Paulo; 1999.
Gonçalves A. Estudo da liga de alumínio-cobre, como filtração alternativa, para radiação X [tese]. Piracicaba: Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 2000.
Tamburús JR, Lavrador MAS. Radiographic contrast. A comparative study of three dental X-ray films. Dentomaxillofac Radio!. 1997; 26(4):201-5.
Ponce AZ, McDavid WD, Underhill TE, Morris CR. Use of E-speed film with added filtration. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1986; 61(3):297-9.
GeistJB, Brand JW. Sensitometric comparison of speed group E and F dental radiographic films. Dentomaxillofac Radial. 2001; 30(3):147-52.
