Cystic fibrosis: comparison between Conventional Chest Physical Therapy and Positive Expiratory Pressure in hospitalized patients

Authors

  • Jefferson Veronezi
  • Rafael Vercelino
  • Cristina Madruga
  • Kamile Borba
  • Patrícia Kaminski
  • Paulo José Cauduro Marostica

Keywords:

cystic fibrosis, conventional chest physical therapy, positive-pressure respiration

Abstract

Objective

To compare the efficacy of Conventional Chest Physical Therapy with Positive Expiratory Pressure in the treatment of cystic fibrosis patients during hospital treatment of exacerbation.

Methods

Randomized clinical trial with 29 patients at the Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre. Thirteen patients were randomly assigned to Group A (Positive Expiratory Pressure) in which the seated patient went through 15 breathing cycles using a mask with a positive end-expiratory pressure of 13 cmH2O, followed by huffing without the mask along with coughing and expectoration. This sequence was repeated 7 times during 30 minutes. Sixteen patients were included in group B (Conventional Chest Physical Therapy) where patients assumed five postural drainage positions. In each position, the chest was submitted to manual clapping for three minutes associated with vibration, deep breathing, huffing, coughing and expectoration. Each position was maintained for five to seven minutes for a total of 30 minutes, twice daily. The patients were evaluated before and after the treatment using pulmonary function tests, peak expiratory flow, measurement of the arterial oxyhemoglobin saturation and determination of the Shwachmann radiographic score.

Results

In a comparison of the outcomes of the two groups using the Student t test and analysis of covariance, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups with respect to outcome (p<0.05).

Conclusion

The results indicated no differences between the techniques evaluated. Further studies are necessary since PEP gives more autonomy to the patients.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Marostica PJ, Raskin S, Abreu-e-Silva FA. Analysis of the deltaF508 mutation in a Brazilian cystic fibrosis population: comparison of pulmonary status of homozygotes with other patients. Braz J Biol Res 1998; 31 (4):529-32

Andrade EF. Abreu-e-Silva FA, Fibrose cística, In: Corrêa da Silva LC. Condutas em pneumologia, Porto Alegre Revinter; 2001, p,919-21

Ribeiro JD, Ribeiro MAGO, Ribeiro AF. Controvérsias na fibrose cística: do pediatra ao especialista. J Pediatria. 2002; 78(2):171-86

Robinson C, Scanlin FT. Cystic fibrosis. In: Fishmann AP, Elias JÁ, Fishman JÁ. Fishman's Pulrnonary diseases and disorders. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1998, p 803-24

Houtmeyers E, Gosselink R, Gayan-Ramirez G, Decrarner M. Regulation of mucociliary clearance in health and disease. Eur Resp J. 1999; 13(5):1177-88

Webber BA, Pryor JA. Physiotherapy. In: Hodson ME, Geddes DM. Cystic fibrosÊs. London: Chapman & Hall Medical; 1995. p,349-57

Mcllwaine PM, Wong LT. Peacock D, Davidson GF. Long-term comparative trial of conventional postural drainage and percussion versus positive expiratory pressure physiotherapy in the treatment of cystic fibrosis. J Pediatric. 1997; 131 (4):570-4

Miller S. Hall DO, Clayton CB, Nelson R. Chest physiotherapy in cystic fibrosis: a comparative study of autogenic drainage and the active age of breathing techniques with postural drainage. Thorax. 1995 50(2):165-9.

Scanlan C, Myslinski MJ. Terapia de higiene brônquica. São Paulo: Manole; 2000. p. 817-43.

Rabin HR, Butler SM, Wohl MLB, et al. Pu[monary exacerbation in cystic fibrosis. Pediatrfc Pulmonol, 2004; 37:400-6.

Sociedades Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia. Diretrizes para testes de função pulmonar. J Pneumol, 2002; 1 -82

Shwachman H, Kulczycki LL. Long-term study of one hundred five patients with cystic fibrosis; studies made over a five-to-fourteen-year period. Am J DisChild. 1958; 96(1):6-15.

Oberwaldner B, Evans JC, Zach MS. Forced expirations against a variable resistance: a new chest physiotherapy method in cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1986; 2(6):358-67.

Falk M, Kelstrup M. Andersen JB, Kinoshita T, Fatk P, Stovring S, Gothgen l. Improving the bottle ketchup bottle method with positive expiratory pressure, PEP, in cystic fibrosis. Eur J Respir Dis. 1984; 65(6):423-32

Darbee JC, Ohtake PJ,Grant BJ. Physiologic evidence for the efficacy of positive expiratory pressure as an airway clearance technique }n patients wIth Cystic Fibrosis. Physical Therapy. 2004; 84(6):524-37.

Steen HJ. Redmond AOB. O'neill D. Beattie F. Evaluation of the PEP mask in cystic fibrosis. Acta Pediatr Scand. 1991; 80(1):51-6

Mcllwaine PM. Wong LT, Peacock D, Davidson AG Long-term comparative trÊal of expiratory pressure versus oscillating positive expiratory pressure (flutter) physiotherapy in the treatment of cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr. 2001; 138(6):845-50

Azeredo CAC. Pressão expiratória positiva. In: Azeredo CAC. Fisioterapia respiratória moderna. São Paulo Manole; 1993. p.56

Levitzky MG. Mecânica da respiração. In: Levitzky MG. Pulmonary physiology. 6th. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2004' P.39

Boat TF. Cystic fibrosis. In: Behrrnan RE, Kliegman RM, Jenson HB. Tratado de pediatria. 16. ed. Rio de Janeiro Guanabara Koogan; 2002. p.1296-308 .

Elkins MR. Jones A, Schans C. Positive expiratory pressure physiotherapy for airway clearance in people with Cystic Fibrosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004; (1):CD003147.

Published

2005-12-31

How to Cite

Veronezi, J., Vercelino, R., Madruga, C., Borba, K., Kaminski, P., & Marostica, P. J. C. (2005). Cystic fibrosis: comparison between Conventional Chest Physical Therapy and Positive Expiratory Pressure in hospitalized patients. Revista De Ciências Médicas, 14(6). Retrieved from https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/cienciasmedicas/article/view/1140

Issue

Section

Artigos Originais