Estética e ecologia: uma dualidade? Uma busca sistemática para a arquitetura da paisagem | Aesthetics and ecology: a duality? A systematic search for landscape architecture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24220/2318-0919v18e2021a4806Palavras-chave:
Arquitetura da paisagem contemporânea, Estética ecológica, Paradigma ambiental.Resumo
A paisagem contemporânea, caracterizada pelo habitat humano natural e urbano, apresenta um panorama plural de ideias e práticas. Nesse contexto, a arquitetura da paisagem aparece como atividade proeminente de projeto, evidenciando espaços livres e verdes. Entende-se que há reequilíbrios entre noções de proteção e de consumo configurando a paisagem contemporânea e, diante disso, este artigo investiga se a relação entre dois importantes fundamentos, estética e ecologia, permanece polarizada. Assim, utiliza-se do processo de busca sistemática para abordar a teoria da arquitetura da paisagem contemporânea, delineando um portfólio de artigos provenientes de dois relevantes periódicos da área, a partir de palavras-chave, para discutir os limites do campo disciplinar da arquitetura da paisagem explorando natureza, escala e impacto da profissão, bem como a inserção de novos paradigmas. Destaca-se a elasticidade entre planejamento e projeto da paisagem, que elabora continuidades e mudanças teóricas e, ainda, propicia encontros colaborativos, como a estética ecológica e projeto (ou design) ecológico.
Downloads
Referências
BABÍ ALMENAR, J. et al. Integration of ecosystem services into a conceptual spatial planning framework based on a landscape ecology perspective. Landscape Ecology, v. 33, n. 12, p. 2047-2059, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0727-8
BARRETT, T. L.; FARINA, A.; BARRETT, G. W. Aesthetic landscapes: an emergent component in sustaining societies. Landscape Ecology, v. 24, n. 8, p. 1029-1035, 2009. https://doi.org.ez79.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1007/s10980-009-9354-8
BASTIAN, O. Perspective paper: Landscape Ecology: towards a unified discipline? Landscape Ecology, v. 16, n. 8, p. 757-766, 2001. https://doi.org.ez79.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1023/A:1014412915534
BOURASSA, S. C. Toward a theory of landscape aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 15, n. 3, p. 241-252, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(88)90048-5
BROWN, T.; KEANE, T.; KAPLAN, S. Aesthetics and management: bridging the gap. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 13, p. 1-10, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(86)90002-2
BÜRGI, M. et al. Analyzing dynamics and values of cultural landscapes. Landscape Ecology, v. 32, n. 11, p. 2077–2081, 2017. https://doi.org.ez79.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1007/s10980-017-
-0
CALDWELL, L. K. Landscape, law and public policy: conditions for an ecological perspective. Landscape Ecology, v. 5, n. 1, p. 3-8, 1990. https://doi.org.ez79.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1007/BF00153799
CALKINS, M. Strategy use and challenges of ecological design in landscape architecture. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 73, n. 1, p. 29-48, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.06.003
CHEN, X.; WU, J. Sustainable landscape architecture: Implications of the Chinese philosophy of “unity of man with nature” and beyond. Landscape Ecology, v. 24, n. 8, p. 1015-1026, 2009. https://doi.org.ez79.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1007/s10980-009-9350-z
COLLIER, M. J. Novel ecosystems and social-ecological resilience. Landscape Ecology, v. 30, n. 8, p. 1363-1369, 2015. https://doi.org.ez79.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1007/s10980-015-0243-z
DANIEL, T. C. Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 54, n. 1, p. 267-281, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00141-4
FERENHOF, H. A; FERNANDES, R. F. Desmistificando a revisão de literatura como base para redação científica: método SSF. Revista ACB, v. 21, n. 3, p. 550-563, 2016. Disponível em: https://revista.acbsc.org.br/racb/article/view/1194. Acesso em: 22 out. 2019.
FILOR, S. W. The nature of landscape design and design process. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 30, n. 3, p. 121-129, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(94)90051-5
FOO, K.; MCCARTHY, J.; BEBBINGTON, A. Activating Landscape Ecology: a governance framework for design-in-science. Landscape Ecology, v. 33, n. 5, p. 675-689, 2018. https://doi.org.ez79.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1007/s10980-018-0630-3
FORMAN, R. T. T. Urban ecology principles: are urban ecology and natural area ecology really different? Landscape Ecology, v. 31, n. 8, p. 1653-1662, 2016. https://doi.org.ez79.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1007/s10980-016-0424-4
FU, B.; LÜ, Y.; CHEN, L. Expanding the bridging capability of Landscape Ecology. Landscape Ecology, v. 23, n. 4, p. 375-376, 2008. https://doi.org.ez79.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1007/s10980-008-9214-y
GAZVODA, D. Characteristics of modern landscape architecture and its education. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 60, n. 2, p. 117-133, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00064-6
GOBSTER, P. H. et al. The shared landscape: what does aesthetics have to do with ecology? Landscape Ecology, v. 22, n. 7, p. 959-972, 2007. https://doi.org.ez79.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1007/s10980-007-9110-x
GOBSTER, P. H. (Text) Mining the LANDscape: themes and trends over 40 years of Landscape and Urban Planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 126, p. 21-30, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.02.025
GOBSTER, P. H.; XIANG, W. N. What do we mean by “landscape”? Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 106, n. 3, p. 219-220, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.05.004
HELFENSTEIN, J. et al. Landscape ecology meets landscape science. Landscape Ecology, v. 29, n. 7, p. 1109-1113, 2014. https://doi.org.ez79.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1007/s10980-014-0055-6
HOBBS, R. Future landscapes and the future of landscape ecology. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 37, n. 1, p. 1-9, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(96)00364-7
JACOBS, P.; MANN, R. Landscape prospects of the next millennium. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 47, n. 3-4, p. 129-133, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00081-X
JONES, G. R.; ATKINSON, M. S. Making a marriage with the land: the future of the landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 45, n. 2-3, p. 61-92, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00011-0
JONES, K. B. et al. Informing landscape planning and design for sustaining ecosystem services from existing spatial patterns and knowledge. Landscape Ecology, v. 28, n. 6, p. 1175-1192, 2013. https://doi.org.ez79.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1007/s10980-012-9794-4
JORGENSEN, A. Beyond the view: future directions in landscape aesthetics research. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 100, n. 4, p. 353-355, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.023
KEMPENAAR, A. et al. “Design makes you understand”: mapping the contributions of designing to regional planning and development. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 149, p. 20–30, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.01.002
LENZHOLZER, S.; DUCHHART, I.; KOH, J. “Research through designing” in landscape architecture. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 113, p. 120-127, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan. 2013.02.003
LIAO, K. H.; CHAN, J. K. H. What is ecological wisdom and how does it relate to ecological knowledge? Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 155, p. 111-113, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.02.003
LOTHIAN, A. Landscape and the philosophy of aesthetics: is landscape quality inherent in the landscape or in the eye of the beholder? Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 44, n. 4, p. 177-198, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00019-5
MCALPINE, C. A. et al. Can a problem-solving approach strengthen Landscape Ecology’s contribution to sustainable landscape planning? Landscape Ecology, v. 25, n. 8, p. 1155-1168, 2010. https://doi.org.ez79.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1007/s10980-010-9514-x
MACEDO, S. S. Quadro do paisagismo no Brasil: 1783-2000. São Paulo: EdUSP, 2015. p. 28. (Coleção Quapá).
MAGALHÃES, M. A arquitectura paisagista: morfologia e complexidade. Lisboa: Estampa, 2001. p. 37-74.
MUSACCHIO, L. R. The grand challenge to operationalize landscape sustainability and the designin-science paradigm. Landscape Ecology, v. 26, n. 1, p.1-5, 2011. https://doi.org.ez79.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1007/s10980-010-9562-2
MUSACCHIO, L. R. Cultivating deep care: Integrating landscape ecological research into the cultural dimension of ecosystem services. Landscape Ecology, v. 28, n. 6, p. 1025-1038, 2013. https://doi.
org.ez79.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1007/s10980-013-9907-8
MUSACCHIO, L. R. Ecologies as a complement to ecosystem services? Exploring how landscape planners might advance understanding about human–nature relationships in changing landscapes. Landscape Ecology, v. 33, n. 6, p. 847-860, 2018. https://doi.org.ez79.periodicos.capes.gov.
br/10.1007/s10980-018-0646-8
NADENICEK, D. J. The poetry of landscape ecology: an historical perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 37, n. 1-2, p. 123-127, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(96)00377-5
NASSAUER, J. I. The appearance of landscape as matter of policy. Landscape Ecology, v. 6, n. 4, p. 239-250, 1992. https://doi.org.ez79.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1007/BF00129702
NASSAUER, J. I. Culture and changing landscape structure. Landscape Ecology, v. 10, n. 4, p. 229-237, 1995. https://doi-org.ez79.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1007/BF00129257
NASSAUER, J. I. Cultural Sustainability: Aligning aesthetics and Ecology. In: NASSAUER. J. I. (ed.). Placing nature: culture and landscape ecology. Washington: Island press, 1997. cap 4, p. 67-83.
NASSAUER, J. I. Landscape as medium and method for synthesis in urban ecological design. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 106, n. 3, p. 221-229, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.03.014
NASSAUER, J. I.; OPDAM, P. Design in science: extending the landscape ecology paradigm. Landscape Ecology, v. 23, n. 6, p. 633-644, 2008. https://doi.org.ez79.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1007/s10980-008-9226-7
NASSAUER, J. I.; WANG, Z.; DAYRELL, E. What will the neighbors think? Cultural norms and ecological design. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 92, n. 3-4, p. 282-292, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.05.010
NEUMAN, M. Regional design: Recovering a great landscape architecture and urban planning tradition. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 47, n. 3-4, p. 115-128, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00079-1
NOHL, W. Sustainable landscape use and aesthetic perception. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 54, n. 1-4, p. 223-237, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00138-4
OGRIN, D. Landscape architecture and its articulation into landscape planning and landscape design. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 30, n. 3, p. 131-137, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(94)90052-3
OPDAM, P.; FOPPEN, R.; VOS, C. Bridging the gap between ecology and spatial planning. Landscape Ecology, v. 16, n. 8, p. 767-779, 2001. https://doi.org.ez79.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1023/A:1014475908949
PARSONS, R. Conflict between ecological sustainability and environmental aesthetics: conundrum, cantid or curiosity. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 32, n. 3, p. 227-244, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(95)07004-E
PARSONS, R.; DANIEL, T. C. Good looking: in defense of scenic landscape aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 60, n. 1, p. 43-56, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00051-8
RODIEK, J. Human habitats: A focus for design education in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 73, n. 2-3, p. 81-85, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.11.011
SIJMONS, D. Regional planning as a strategy. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 18, n. 3-4, p. 265-273, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(90)90014-S
STEINER, F. Landscape ecological urbanism: Origins and trajectories. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 100, n. 4, p. 333-337, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.01.020
STEINER, F. Frontiers in urban ecological design and planning research. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 125, p. 304-311, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.023
STEINER, F. The application of ecological knowledge requires a pursuit of wisdom. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 155, p. 108-110, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.07.015
STILES, R. Landscape theory: a missing link between landscape planning and landscape design? Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 30, n. 3, p. 139-149, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(94)90053-1
TAYLOR, P. D. Fragmentation and cultural landscapes: Tightening the relationship between human beings and the environment. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 58, n. 2-4, p. 93-99, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00212-2
THORNE, J. F.; HUANG, C. S. Toward a landscape ecological aesthetic: methodologies for designers and planners. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 21, n. 1-2, p. 61-79, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(91)90033-I
VAN DER JAGT, A. P. N. et al. Unearthing the picturesque: the validity of the preference matrix as a measure of landscape aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 124, p. 1-13, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.12.006
VON HAAREN, C. et al. Opportunities for design approaches in landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 130, p. 159-170, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.06.012
WANG, X.; PALAZZO, D.; CARPER, M. Ecological wisdom as an emerging field of scholarly inquiry in urban planning and design. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 155, p. 100-107, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.019
WU, J. Urban sustainability: an inevitable goal of landscape research. Landscape Ecology, v. 25, n. 1, p. 1-4, 2010.
https://doi.org.ez79.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1007/s10980-009-9444-7
WU, J. Landscape sustainability science: ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landscape Ecology, v. 28, n. 6, p. 999-1023, 2013. https://doi.org.ez79.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1007/s10980-013-9894-9
XIANG, W. N. Doing real and permanent good in Landscape and Urban Planning: ecological wisdom for urban sustainability. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 121, p. 65-69, 2014. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.09.008
ZHENG, B.; ZHANG, Y.; CHEN, J. Preference to home landscape: wildness or neatness? Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 99, n. 1, p. 1-8, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.08.006
