PARQUES E PÓLOS TECNOLÓGICOS : CONSIDERAÇÕES CRÍTICAS SOBRE A EXP.ERIÊNCIA INTERNACIONAL - LIÇÕES PARA AMÉRICA LATINA
Resumo
A singular importância atribuída aos pólos e parques tecnológicos e incubadoras de empresas como indutores privilegiados do desenvolvimento e sua consideração como elementos orientadores de uma política científica e tecnológica foi a motivação mais geral para a elaboração do presente trabalho.
Referências
ACARD - Advisory Council for Applied Research and Development. Improving research links between higher education and industry. London: Crown, 1983. 73p.
AUTIO, E. Newtechnology-based firms as agents of R&D and innovation: an empirical study. Technovation, v.14, n.4, p. 259-273,1994.
BOUCKE, C. et al. Technopolises as a Policy Goal: a Morphological Study of the Wissenschaftsstadt Ulm. Technovation, v.14, n.6, p. 407 -18. 1994.
BRUHAT,T. Evaluatingscience and technology parks in France. Industry and Higher Education. Brighton. v.9, n.6, p. 349-356, dec. 1995. BRUNAT, E & Reverdy, B. , Linking University and Industrial Research in France. Science and Public Policy, v.16, n. 5, p.283-93. 1989.
BUSSINESS WEEK. Silicon Valley. how it really works. New York: McGraw~Hill. n. 3525-855. aug. 17-25. 1997. special double issue.
CARIOLA, M. & Rolfo, S. Innovation centres as toei for the local technological policy.Advantages and limits ofthe Italian experience. In: International Conference on Technology Policy and Innovation, 2,1998. Lisboa. Proceedings...Lisboa: Instituto Superior Técnico. 1998. p. 22.5.1 - 22.5.8.
CASTILLO, J. Diez, MA Barroeta, B. Technology parks and university business relations in Spain. Industry and Higher Education. Brighton. v.9, n.6, p. 340-348, dec. 1995.
CHANARON, J.J. French Science Policyand Local High Tech Industries. Science and Public Policy, v.16, n.1, p.19-26. 1989.
CHARLES, D. Hayward, S. Thomas, D. Science parks and regional technology strategies. Industry and Higher Education. Brighton. v.9, n.6, p. 332-339, dec. 1995.
COOPER, A.C. Spin-offs and technical entrepreneurship. IEE Transactions on Engineering Management, v.18, n.1, p.2-6, 1971.
DORFMAM, N.S. Route 128:The Developmentofa Regional High Tech Technology Economy. Research Policy, n.12, p.299-316. 1983
FELSENSTEIN, D. University-related scíence parks: seedbeds or enclaves of innovation? Technovation, v.14, n.2, p. 93-110,1994.
FRANZ, P. Difering development paths of technology and innovation centres in East Germany. In: International Conference on Technology Policyand Innovation, 2, 1998. Lisboa. Proceedings... Lisboa: Instituto Superior Técnico. 1998. p. 22.4.1 - 22.4.6.
GOMES, E. A experiência brasileira de pólos tecnológicos: uma abordagem político-institucional. Campinas: UNICAMP,1995. 143 p. Dissertação (mestrado em política científica e tecnológica)- Instituto de Geociências. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 1995.
GUEDES, M.&Bermúdez, LA Parques tecnológicos e incubadoras de empresas em países em desenvolvimento: lições do Brasil. In: Guedes, M. & Formica, P. (ed.). A economia dos parques tecnológicos. Rio de Janeiro: Anprotec, 1997. p.147-159.
HIGASHI,H. The technopolis in Japan. its past its future. Industry and Higher Education. Brighton. v.9, n.6, p. 357-364, dec. 1995.
HOBDAY, M. The Limits of Silicon Valley: a Critique of Network Theory. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, v.6, n.2, p.231-44.1994.
JONES, AD.W &Dickson, K.E. Science Parks in Europe -The United Kingdom Experience. In: Gibb, J.M (coord). Science Parks and Innovation Centres: their economic and social impacts. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 1985. p.32-35.
JOSEPH, R.A Silicon Valley myth and the origins of technology parks in Australia. Science and Tecnology PolíCy, v. 16, n.6, p.353-365, dec. 1989.
LACAVE, M. Technopoles: instruments of local and regional economic development. versão inglês de "Les technopoles, outils dedeveloppment". (s.I.): PeterProwse.1991.
LAFITE, P. Sophia-Antipolis and its impacts on Côte d'Azur. In: Gibb, J.M. (coord.) Science Parks and Innovation Centres: the ire conomic and social impacts. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 1985. p.87-90.
LUGER, M.L. & Goldstein, HA Technology in the garden. research parks and economic development. Chapel HiII: The Universitiy of Carolina Press, 1991.241 p.
LUNARDI, ME Parques tecnológicos. Estratégias de localízaçio em Porto Alegre, Florianópolís e Curitiba. Curitiba: ed. do Autor, 1997. 90p.
MASSEY, O., Quintas, P. & Wield, D. High tech fantasies: science parks insociety, science and space. London:Routledge, 1992. 268p.
MATKIN, G.w. Technology transfer and the university (continuing higher education series). NewYork: American Council on Education. 1990. 329p.
MEDEIROS, J.A. , Pólos tecnológicos e competitividade. Sao Paulo: IEA/USP, Estudos Avançados. Coleção Documentos. Série Política e Tecnológica, n.12, 39p.1993.
MEDEIROS, J.A. As Novas tecnologias e a formação dos pólos tecnológicos brasileiros. São Paulo: IEAlUSP. Estudos Avançados. Coleção Documentos. Série Política Científica e Tecnológica. n5.31p.1990
MEDEIROS, J.A. et aI. Pólos, parques e incubadoras: em busca da modernização e competitividade. Brasília:CNPq, 1992. 312p.
MONCK, C.S.P. et aI. Science Parks and the growth of high technology firms. London: Routhledge. 270p. 1990.
OH, D.S. High technology and sustainable regional development in Korean technopolis: case of Taedok Science Town. In: International
Conference on Technology Policy and Innovation, 2, 1998. Lisboa. Proceedings..Lisboa: Instituto Superior Técnico. 1998. p. 22.3.1 - 22.3.8.
PALADINO, G. & Medeiros, L.A. Parques tecnológicos e meio urbano. artigos e debates. Brasília: Anprotec. 1997. 319p.
PETERS, L. Fusfeld; H. Current US university-industry reserach connections. In: National Science Foundation. University-industry research relationships. Washington, D.C., 1982. 107 p.
QUINTAS, P. et al. Some questionsraised by the UK Science Parks experience. Note Economiche, v.23, n.2, p.354-373. 1993.
QUINTAS, P. et. al. Academic-industry links and innovation: questioning the Science Park mode!. Technovation, v.12, n.3, 1992, p.161-175.
QU1NTAS, P. Evaluating the UK Science Park model: some methodological issues.ln: European Symposium on Research into Science Parks. European Union Sprint Programo Rennes. 1994. 24p.
ROBERTS, E.B. ; Wainer, HA Entreprises on Route 128. Science Journal, vA, n.12, p.78-83, 1968.
ROTHWELL, R European technology policy evolution: convergence towards SMSEs and regional technology transfer. Technovation, v.12, n. 4, p.223-228, 1992.
ROTHWELL,R &Dodgson, M. Technology-based small and medium sized firms in Europe: the IRDAC resuJts and their pubHc policy implications. Science and Public Policy, v. 16, n. 1, p. 9-18, 1998.
RUFFIEX, B. A comparison of prominent French Science Parks: Sophia-Antipolis and Meylan-Zirst, ECPR Joint Session of Workshops. In:
Workshop Politics and Technology. Amsterdam. 1987. 25p.
SEGAL, N.S. & Quince, RE. 1985, The Cambridge phenomenon and the role of the Cambridge Science Park. In: Gibb, J.M. (coord.) Science Parks and Innovation Centres: their economic and social impacts. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 1985. p.142-48.
TESSE, P.Y One technopole networkinnovation of centres: the Lyon model. In: Gibb, J.M. (coord.) Science Parks and Innovation Centres: their economic and social impacts. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 1985. p.189-195.
UKSPA - United kingdom Science Parks Association. "Forward" to Science Par1cdirectory, Sutton Cowfield: UK. 1985.
XUE, L. & Wang. X. The development of science park in China:an empirical analysis.ln: tnternational Conference on Technology Poticy and Innovation, 2, 1998. Lisboa. Proceedings...Lisboa: fnstituto Superior Técnico. 1998. p. 22.2.1 - 22.2.8.
